Wanna contraction in first language acquisition, child second language acquisition, and adult second language acquisition

IF 2.5 1区 文学 Q1 LINGUISTICS Bilingualism: Language and Cognition Pub Date : 2023-09-11 DOI:10.1017/s1366728923000640
Haerim Hwang
{"title":"Wanna contraction in first language acquisition, child second language acquisition, and adult second language acquisition","authors":"Haerim Hwang","doi":"10.1017/s1366728923000640","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Contraction of <jats:italic>want to</jats:italic> to <jats:italic>wanna</jats:italic> is sometimes possible (e.g., <jats:italic>Who do you want to/wanna stay with ___ ?</jats:italic>), but sometimes impossible (e.g., <jats:italic>Who do you want ___ to/*wanna stay?</jats:italic>). This contrast is attributable to the grammatical constraint that a <jats:italic>wh</jats:italic>-trace blocks the contraction of <jats:italic>want</jats:italic> and <jats:italic>to</jats:italic>. Most first language (L1) and second language (L2) acquisition studies testing learner knowledge of this constraint have used elicited production tasks and focused on adult participants, with inconsistent results. Using a child-friendly acceptability judgment task, the current study shows that children as young as 3;11 and both child and adult L2 learners have target-like knowledge of the constraint on <jats:italic>wanna</jats:italic> contraction. This result is in line with the position that L1 acquisition, child L2 acquisition, and adult L2 acquisition are qualitatively similar.","PeriodicalId":8758,"journal":{"name":"Bilingualism: Language and Cognition","volume":"8 15","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bilingualism: Language and Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1366728923000640","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Contraction of want to to wanna is sometimes possible (e.g., Who do you want to/wanna stay with ___ ?), but sometimes impossible (e.g., Who do you want ___ to/*wanna stay?). This contrast is attributable to the grammatical constraint that a wh-trace blocks the contraction of want and to. Most first language (L1) and second language (L2) acquisition studies testing learner knowledge of this constraint have used elicited production tasks and focused on adult participants, with inconsistent results. Using a child-friendly acceptability judgment task, the current study shows that children as young as 3;11 and both child and adult L2 learners have target-like knowledge of the constraint on wanna contraction. This result is in line with the position that L1 acquisition, child L2 acquisition, and adult L2 acquisition are qualitatively similar.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
第一语言习得、儿童第二语言习得和成人第二语言学习中的Wanna收缩
想和想的收缩有时是可能的(例如,你想/想和___在一起?),但有时是不可能的(如,你想让___和/想留下谁?)。这种对比可归因于wh痕迹阻碍了want和to的收缩这一语法约束。大多数测试学习者对这一约束知识的第一语言(L1)和第二语言(L2)习得研究都使用了引出的生产任务,并将重点放在成年参与者身上,结果不一致。使用儿童友好的可接受性判断任务,目前的研究表明,3岁以下的儿童;11,儿童和成人二语学习者都具有对愿望收缩的约束的目标式知识。这一结果符合L1习得、儿童L2习得和成人L2习得在质量上相似的立场。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
16.70%
发文量
86
期刊最新文献
The neurophysiology of phonemic contrasts perception in L2/L3 learners: The role of acquisition setting Effects of the French grammatical gender system on bilingual adults' perception of objects Experiential, perceptual, and cognitive individual differences in the development of declarative and automatized phonological vocabulary knowledge Cross-linguistic transfer in bilingual children's phonological and morphological awareness skills: a longitudinal perspective The subject advantage in LIS internally headed relative clauses: an eye-tracking study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1