Linking the Water and Carbon Economies of Plants in a Drying and Warming Climate

IF 9 1区 农林科学 Q1 FORESTRY Current Forestry Reports Pub Date : 2023-10-23 DOI:10.1007/s40725-023-00202-4
Mazen Nakad, Sanna Sevanto, Jean-Christophe Domec, Gabriel Katul
{"title":"Linking the Water and Carbon Economies of Plants in a Drying and Warming Climate","authors":"Mazen Nakad, Sanna Sevanto, Jean-Christophe Domec, Gabriel Katul","doi":"10.1007/s40725-023-00202-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">\n<b>Purpose of Review</b>\n</h3><p>Harsher abiotic conditions are projected for many woodland areas, especially in already arid and semi-arid climates such as the Southwestern USA. Stomatal regulation of their aperture is one of the ways plants cope with drought. Interestingly, the dominant species in the Southwest USA, like in many other ecosystems, have different stomatal behaviors to regulate water loss ranging from isohydric (e.g., piñon pine) to anisohydric (e.g., juniper) conditions suggesting a possible niche separation or different but comparable strategies of coping with stress. The relatively isohydric piñon pine is usually presumed to be more sensitive to drought or less desiccation tolerant compared to the anisohydric juniper although both species close their stomata under drought to avoid hydraulic failure, and the mortality of one species (mostly piñon) over the other in the recent droughts can be attributed to insect outbreaks rather than drought sensitivity alone. Furthermore, no clear evidence exists demonstrating that iso- or anisohydric strategy increases water use efficiency over the other consistently. How these different stomatal regulatory tactics enable woody species to withstand harsh abiotic conditions remains a subject of inquiry to be covered in this review.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">\n<b>Recent Findings</b>\n</h3><p>This contribution reviews and explores the use of simplified stomatal optimization theories to assess how photosynthesis and transpiration respond to warming (H), drought (D), and combined warming and drought (H+D) for isohydric and anisohydric woody plants experiencing the same abiotic stressors. It sheds light on how simplified stomatal optimization theories can separate between photosynthetic and hydraulic acclimation due to abiotic stressors and how the interactive effects of H+D versus H or D alone can be incorporated into future climate models.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">\n<b>Summary</b>\n</h3><p>The work here demonstrates how field data can be bridged to simplified optimality principles so as to explore the effect of future changes in temperature and in soil water content on the acclimation of tree species with distinct water use strategies. The results show that the deviations between measurements and predictions from the simplified optimality principle can explain different species’ acclimation behaviors.</p>","PeriodicalId":48653,"journal":{"name":"Current Forestry Reports","volume":"88 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Forestry Reports","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40725-023-00202-4","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Harsher abiotic conditions are projected for many woodland areas, especially in already arid and semi-arid climates such as the Southwestern USA. Stomatal regulation of their aperture is one of the ways plants cope with drought. Interestingly, the dominant species in the Southwest USA, like in many other ecosystems, have different stomatal behaviors to regulate water loss ranging from isohydric (e.g., piñon pine) to anisohydric (e.g., juniper) conditions suggesting a possible niche separation or different but comparable strategies of coping with stress. The relatively isohydric piñon pine is usually presumed to be more sensitive to drought or less desiccation tolerant compared to the anisohydric juniper although both species close their stomata under drought to avoid hydraulic failure, and the mortality of one species (mostly piñon) over the other in the recent droughts can be attributed to insect outbreaks rather than drought sensitivity alone. Furthermore, no clear evidence exists demonstrating that iso- or anisohydric strategy increases water use efficiency over the other consistently. How these different stomatal regulatory tactics enable woody species to withstand harsh abiotic conditions remains a subject of inquiry to be covered in this review.

Recent Findings

This contribution reviews and explores the use of simplified stomatal optimization theories to assess how photosynthesis and transpiration respond to warming (H), drought (D), and combined warming and drought (H+D) for isohydric and anisohydric woody plants experiencing the same abiotic stressors. It sheds light on how simplified stomatal optimization theories can separate between photosynthetic and hydraulic acclimation due to abiotic stressors and how the interactive effects of H+D versus H or D alone can be incorporated into future climate models.

Summary

The work here demonstrates how field data can be bridged to simplified optimality principles so as to explore the effect of future changes in temperature and in soil water content on the acclimation of tree species with distinct water use strategies. The results show that the deviations between measurements and predictions from the simplified optimality principle can explain different species’ acclimation behaviors.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
干旱和变暖气候下植物的水和碳经济联系
综述的目的预测了许多林地的非生物条件,特别是在已经干旱和半干旱的气候中,如美国西南部。气孔调节是植物应对干旱的方法之一。有趣的是,与许多其他生态系统一样,美国西南部的优势物种具有不同的气孔行为来调节水分损失,从等水性(如圆松)到不等水性(例如杜松)条件,这表明可能存在生态位分离或不同但可比的应对压力策略。与异水杜松相比,相对等水杜松通常被认为对干旱更敏感或不太耐干燥,尽管这两个物种在干旱下都会关闭气孔以避免水力衰竭,在最近的干旱中,一个物种(主要是皮农)的死亡率高于另一个物种,这可以归因于昆虫爆发,而不仅仅是干旱敏感性。此外,没有明确的证据表明异水或异水策略能持续提高水的利用效率。这些不同的气孔调节策略如何使木本物种能够承受恶劣的非生物条件,仍然是本综述中有待探讨的主题。最近的发现这篇文章回顾并探索了使用简化的气孔优化理论来评估经历相同非生物应激源的同水和异水木本植物的光合作用和蒸腾作用如何对变暖(H)、干旱(D)以及变暖和干旱联合(H+D)作出反应。它揭示了简化的气孔优化理论如何在非生物应激源引起的光合和水力适应之间分离,以及H+D与单独H或D的相互作用如何纳入未来的气候模型。总结本文的工作展示了如何将现场数据与简化的最优性原理联系起来,以探索未来温度和土壤含水量的变化对具有不同用水策略的树种适应的影响。结果表明,简化最优性原理的测量和预测之间的偏差可以解释不同物种的适应行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current Forestry Reports
Current Forestry Reports Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
15.90
自引率
2.10%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: Current Forestry Reports features in-depth review articles written by global experts on significant advancements in forestry. Its goal is to provide clear, insightful, and balanced contributions that highlight and summarize important topics for forestry researchers and managers. To achieve this, the journal appoints international authorities as Section Editors in various key subject areas like physiological processes, tree genetics, forest management, remote sensing, and wood structure and function. These Section Editors select topics for which leading experts contribute comprehensive review articles that focus on new developments and recently published papers of great importance. Moreover, an international Editorial Board evaluates the yearly table of contents, suggests articles of special interest to their specific country or region, and ensures that the topics are up-to-date and include emerging research.
期刊最新文献
Established Invasive Tree Species Offer Opportunities for Forest Resilience to Climate Change The Ecology, Economics, and Management of Agrilus Beetles From Industry 5.0 to Forestry 5.0: Bridging the gap with Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence A Review of Software Solutions to Process Ground-based Point Clouds in Forest Applications Sustainability, Circularity, and Innovation in Wood-based Panel Manufacturing in the 2020s: Opportunities and Challenges
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1