A conceptual model of family well-being: Bridging constructs, fields, and practice applications

IF 3.2 1区 社会学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES Journal of Family Theory & Review Pub Date : 2023-11-03 DOI:10.1111/jftr.12543
AliceAnn Crandall, Erin Kramer Holmes, Sariah E. Villalon, Nomi S. Weiss-Laxer, Jerica M. Berge
{"title":"A conceptual model of family well-being: Bridging constructs, fields, and practice applications","authors":"AliceAnn Crandall,&nbsp;Erin Kramer Holmes,&nbsp;Sariah E. Villalon,&nbsp;Nomi S. Weiss-Laxer,&nbsp;Jerica M. Berge","doi":"10.1111/jftr.12543","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Family functioning, family resilience, family health, and family flourishing are concepts used in research across multiple fields. One challenge of their interdisciplinary use is that there are a variety of definitions of each, with researchers sometimes creating their own definitions rather than using well-established definitions. This can lead to different conceptualization of the same concept across studies. It is, therefore, necessary to develop a conceptual framework to understand the interplay between each of these family concepts, including their differences and overlap, to inform research, practice, and policy. In this article, we present the definitions, concepts, and common measurements of each concept. Based on the examination of the literature, we propose a conceptual framework of family well-being that demonstrates the interplay of these concepts. We present empirical findings to understand how well some common measures differentiate between each other. Finally, we discuss the implications for research and practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":47446,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jftr.12543","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Family functioning, family resilience, family health, and family flourishing are concepts used in research across multiple fields. One challenge of their interdisciplinary use is that there are a variety of definitions of each, with researchers sometimes creating their own definitions rather than using well-established definitions. This can lead to different conceptualization of the same concept across studies. It is, therefore, necessary to develop a conceptual framework to understand the interplay between each of these family concepts, including their differences and overlap, to inform research, practice, and policy. In this article, we present the definitions, concepts, and common measurements of each concept. Based on the examination of the literature, we propose a conceptual framework of family well-being that demonstrates the interplay of these concepts. We present empirical findings to understand how well some common measures differentiate between each other. Finally, we discuss the implications for research and practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
家庭幸福感的概念模型:连接结构、领域和实践应用
家庭功能、家庭韧性、家庭健康和家庭繁荣是多个领域研究中使用的概念。跨学科使用它们的一个挑战是,每种定义都有多种多样,研究人员有时会创建自己的定义,而不是使用公认的定义。这可能导致不同研究对同一概念的不同概念化。因此,有必要制定一个概念框架,以了解这些家庭概念之间的相互作用,包括它们的差异和重叠,从而为研究、实践和政策提供信息。在本文中,我们介绍了每个概念的定义、概念和常见度量。在研究文献的基础上,我们提出了一个家庭幸福感的概念框架,展示了这些概念的相互作用。我们提出了经验发现,以了解一些常见的衡量标准之间的差异。最后,我们讨论了对研究和实践的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
42
期刊最新文献
Intergenerational coparenting and child development outcomes: A systematic review Parent–child discrepancies in mate preferences: A three‐level meta‐analysis Don't skip class: A new conceptual model for examining classism among adolescents and families Bringing birth fathers to the forefront: A two‐decade scoping review of birth father experiences in adoption Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1