An investigation of temperature and fever burdens in patients with sepsis admitted from the emergency department to the hospital

IF 1.5 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Acute Medicine & Surgery Pub Date : 2023-11-02 DOI:10.1002/ams2.902
Jessica L. Beadle, Sarah M. Perman, Justin Pennington, David F. Gaieski
{"title":"An investigation of temperature and fever burdens in patients with sepsis admitted from the emergency department to the hospital","authors":"Jessica L. Beadle,&nbsp;Sarah M. Perman,&nbsp;Justin Pennington,&nbsp;David F. Gaieski","doi":"10.1002/ams2.902","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>We sought to collect granular data on temperature burden to further explore existing conflicting information on the relationship between temperature alterations and outcomes in patients with sepsis requiring hospital admission.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This was a prospective cohort study that enrolled a convenience sample of patients with sepsis or septic shock admitted to the hospital from the emergency department (ED). A “unit of temperature burden (UTB)” was defined as &gt;1°C (1.8°F) above or below 37°C (98.6°F) for 1 min. Fever burden was defined as the number of UTBs &gt;38°C (100.4°F). The primary objective was to calculate the fever burden in patients with sepsis during their ED stay. This was analyzed for patients who present to triage febrile or hypothermic and also for those who developed temperature abnormalities during their ED stay. The secondary objectives were correlating fever and hypothermia burden with in-hospital mortality, Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) criteria, and the quick Sequential (Sepsis-Associated) Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score and identification of patients who may benefit from early implementation of targeted temperature management.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 256 patients met the inclusion criteria. The mean age of patients was 60.1 ± 18.4 years; 46% were female and 29.6% were black. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) fever burden for the fever in triage cohort (<i>n</i> = 99) was 364.6 (174.3-716.8) UTB and for the no fever in triage cohort (<i>n</i> = 157) was 179.3 (80.9-374.0) UTB (p = 0.005). The two groups had similar in-hospital mortality (6.1 vs 8.3%; p = 0.5). The median fever burden for the fever anytime cohort was 303.8 (IQR 138.8-607.9) UTB and they had lower mortality than the no fever anytime cohort (4.7% vs 11.2%; p = 0.052). Patients with fever at triage had higher mean SIRS criteria than those without (2.8 vs 2.0; p &lt; 0.001) while qSOFA points were similar (p = 0.199). A total of 27 patients had hypothermia during their ED stay and these patients were older with higher mean SIRS criteria.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Patients with sepsis and septic shock have a significant temperature burden in the ED. When comparing patients who had fever at any time during their ED stay with those who never had a fever, a trend toward an inverse relationship between fever burden and mortality was found.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":7196,"journal":{"name":"Acute Medicine & Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10622605/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acute Medicine & Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ams2.902","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

We sought to collect granular data on temperature burden to further explore existing conflicting information on the relationship between temperature alterations and outcomes in patients with sepsis requiring hospital admission.

Methods

This was a prospective cohort study that enrolled a convenience sample of patients with sepsis or septic shock admitted to the hospital from the emergency department (ED). A “unit of temperature burden (UTB)” was defined as >1°C (1.8°F) above or below 37°C (98.6°F) for 1 min. Fever burden was defined as the number of UTBs >38°C (100.4°F). The primary objective was to calculate the fever burden in patients with sepsis during their ED stay. This was analyzed for patients who present to triage febrile or hypothermic and also for those who developed temperature abnormalities during their ED stay. The secondary objectives were correlating fever and hypothermia burden with in-hospital mortality, Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) criteria, and the quick Sequential (Sepsis-Associated) Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score and identification of patients who may benefit from early implementation of targeted temperature management.

Results

A total of 256 patients met the inclusion criteria. The mean age of patients was 60.1 ± 18.4 years; 46% were female and 29.6% were black. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) fever burden for the fever in triage cohort (n = 99) was 364.6 (174.3-716.8) UTB and for the no fever in triage cohort (n = 157) was 179.3 (80.9-374.0) UTB (p = 0.005). The two groups had similar in-hospital mortality (6.1 vs 8.3%; p = 0.5). The median fever burden for the fever anytime cohort was 303.8 (IQR 138.8-607.9) UTB and they had lower mortality than the no fever anytime cohort (4.7% vs 11.2%; p = 0.052). Patients with fever at triage had higher mean SIRS criteria than those without (2.8 vs 2.0; p < 0.001) while qSOFA points were similar (p = 0.199). A total of 27 patients had hypothermia during their ED stay and these patients were older with higher mean SIRS criteria.

Conclusions

Patients with sepsis and septic shock have a significant temperature burden in the ED. When comparing patients who had fever at any time during their ED stay with those who never had a fever, a trend toward an inverse relationship between fever burden and mortality was found.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急诊科入院败血症患者体温和发热负担的调查
目的:我们试图收集关于温度负担的颗粒数据,以进一步探索需要住院的败血症患者温度变化与预后之间关系的现有相互矛盾的信息。方法:这是一项前瞻性队列研究,纳入了从急诊科(ED)入院的脓毒症或感染性休克患者的方便样本。“温度负荷单位(UTB)”定义为高于或低于37°C(98.6°F) 1分钟1°C(1.8°F)。发热负担定义为38°C(100.4°F)的utb数量。主要目的是计算败血症患者在急诊科住院期间的发热负担。分析了出现发热或体温过低的患者以及在急诊科住院期间出现体温异常的患者。次要目标是将发热和低温负担与住院死亡率、全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)标准、快速序事性(败血症相关)器官衰竭评估(qSOFA)评分以及确定可能从早期实施靶向温度管理中受益的患者之间的关系。结果256例患者符合纳入标准。患者平均年龄60.1±18.4岁;46%为女性,29.6%为黑人。分诊组发热组(n = 99)发热负荷中位数(四分位间距[IQR])为364.6 (174.3-716.8)UTB,无发热组(n = 157)发热负荷中位数(80.9-374.0)UTB (p = 0.005)。两组的住院死亡率相似(6.1% vs 8.3%;p = 0.5)。随时发烧组的中位发烧负担为303.8 (IQR 138.8-607.9) UTB,死亡率低于随时不发烧组(4.7% vs 11.2%;p = 0.052)。分诊时发烧的患者比没有发烧的患者有更高的SIRS平均标准(2.8 vs 2.0;p < 0.001),而qSOFA积分相似(p = 0.199)。共有27例患者在急诊科住院期间发生低温症,这些患者年龄较大,平均SIRS标准较高。结论脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者在急诊科有明显的温度负担。通过比较在急诊科住院期间任何时间发烧的患者与从未发烧的患者,发现发烧负担与死亡率呈反比关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acute Medicine & Surgery
Acute Medicine & Surgery MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
12.50%
发文量
87
审稿时长
53 weeks
期刊最新文献
Impact of urinary culture on diagnosis and treatment strategy after empiric therapy in febrile neutropenic patients Adherence to balanced transfusion among severely injured patients: A post hoc analysis of the RESTRIC trial Increased number of dispatches in emergency medical services correlates to response time extension Successful transition from intravenous to inhalation anesthesia for respiratory management of coronavirus disease pneumonia: A case report Early do-not-attempt resuscitation orders and neurological outcomes in older out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patient: A multicenter observational study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1