Utilization of a public subsidy scheme for dental care services among socially vulnerable citizens out of labor in Copenhagen, Denmark.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Acta Odontologica Scandinavica Pub Date : 2024-03-26 DOI:10.1080/00016357.2023.2279606
Marie Skov Kristensen, Annette Kjær Ersbøll, Ingelise Andersen, Esben Boeskov Øzhayat
{"title":"Utilization of a public subsidy scheme for dental care services among socially vulnerable citizens out of labor in Copenhagen, Denmark.","authors":"Marie Skov Kristensen, Annette Kjær Ersbøll, Ingelise Andersen, Esben Boeskov Øzhayat","doi":"10.1080/00016357.2023.2279606","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Addressing social inequality in oral health and access to dental care is a global concern. This study aims to describe the utilization of a public subsidy scheme targeting vulnerable individuals out of labor in Copenhagen municipality (2013-2018) and to identify key characteristics of individuals eligible to apply.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Data from Copenhagen municipality were combined with data from population and health registers. Employing logistic regression analyses, we examined the association between demographic, socioeconomic, and health-related characteristics and (1) having applied, (2) being granted, and (3) using the subsidy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 65,174 individuals aged 18-65. Of these 10,369 (15.9%) applied for subsidies, submitting a total of 18,529 applications. Overall, 83% of the applications were granted and 85% were used. Significantly increased odds of applying for subsidies were observed among individuals receiving social benefits non-stop over the past year versus none (odds ratio [OR] = 15.45, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 14.24-16.76), aged 50-65 versus 18-29 years (OR = 4.41, CI= 4.15-4.69), and having combined indicators of social vulnerability versus none (OR = 2.90, CI= 2.73-3.07).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While the utilization of the public subsidy scheme is low, individuals who apply are likely to be granted a subsidy and use it. Vulnerability was associated with greater utilization of the scheme, yet a substantial portion of those at risk of poor oral health did not take advantage of it.</p>","PeriodicalId":7313,"journal":{"name":"Acta Odontologica Scandinavica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11302627/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Odontologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00016357.2023.2279606","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Addressing social inequality in oral health and access to dental care is a global concern. This study aims to describe the utilization of a public subsidy scheme targeting vulnerable individuals out of labor in Copenhagen municipality (2013-2018) and to identify key characteristics of individuals eligible to apply.

Material and methods: Data from Copenhagen municipality were combined with data from population and health registers. Employing logistic regression analyses, we examined the association between demographic, socioeconomic, and health-related characteristics and (1) having applied, (2) being granted, and (3) using the subsidy.

Results: The study included 65,174 individuals aged 18-65. Of these 10,369 (15.9%) applied for subsidies, submitting a total of 18,529 applications. Overall, 83% of the applications were granted and 85% were used. Significantly increased odds of applying for subsidies were observed among individuals receiving social benefits non-stop over the past year versus none (odds ratio [OR] = 15.45, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 14.24-16.76), aged 50-65 versus 18-29 years (OR = 4.41, CI= 4.15-4.69), and having combined indicators of social vulnerability versus none (OR = 2.90, CI= 2.73-3.07).

Conclusions: While the utilization of the public subsidy scheme is low, individuals who apply are likely to be granted a subsidy and use it. Vulnerability was associated with greater utilization of the scheme, yet a substantial portion of those at risk of poor oral health did not take advantage of it.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
丹麦哥本哈根,利用公共补贴计划为失业的社会弱势公民提供牙科护理服务。
目标:解决口腔健康和获得牙科护理方面的社会不平等问题是全球关注的问题。本研究旨在描述哥本哈根市(2013-2018年)针对弱势失业人员的公共补贴计划的使用情况,并确定有资格申请的个人的关键特征。材料和方法:哥本哈根市的数据与人口和健康登记册的数据相结合。采用逻辑回归分析,我们检验了人口统计学、社会经济和健康相关特征与(1)申请、(2)获得和(3)使用补贴之间的关系。结果:该研究包括65174名年龄在18-65岁之间的个体。其中10369人(15.9%)申请了补贴,共提交了18529份申请。总体而言,83%的申请获得批准,85%的申请得到使用。在过去一年中,不间断地领取社会福利的个人申请补贴的几率显著增加,而没有(比值比[OR] = 15.45,95%置信区间[CI] = 14.24-16.76),年龄50-65岁,18-29岁 年(OR=4.41,CI=4.15-4.69),具有社会脆弱性与无社会脆弱性的综合指标(OR=2.90,CI=2.73-3.07),然而,有相当一部分口腔健康状况不佳的人并没有利用它。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Odontologica Scandinavica
Acta Odontologica Scandinavica 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.00%
发文量
69
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Odontologica Scandinavica publishes papers conveying new knowledge within all areas of oral health and disease sciences.
期刊最新文献
Exploring the relationship between cycle threshold values and oral manifestations in COVID-19: a comprehensive overview. Sedation of Adults with Orally Administered Midazolam in Dentistry - A Retrospective Study. Chewing Side Preference, Facial Asymmetry and Related Factors in the Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1986. A retrospective study on the influence of inclination of cusp on implant marginal bone height in patients with periodontal disease. The expression of signal regulatory protein alpha (SIRPα) in periodontal cells and tissue.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1