Linking avian malaria parasitemia estimates from quantitative PCR and microscopy reveals new infection patterns in Hawai'i

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 PARASITOLOGY International journal for parasitology Pub Date : 2023-11-03 DOI:10.1016/j.ijpara.2023.10.001
Christa M. Seidl , Francisco C. Ferreira , Katy L. Parise , Kristina L. Paxton , Eben H. Paxton , Carter T. Atkinson , Robert C. Fleischer , Jeffrey T. Foster , A. Marm Kilpatrick
{"title":"Linking avian malaria parasitemia estimates from quantitative PCR and microscopy reveals new infection patterns in Hawai'i","authors":"Christa M. Seidl ,&nbsp;Francisco C. Ferreira ,&nbsp;Katy L. Parise ,&nbsp;Kristina L. Paxton ,&nbsp;Eben H. Paxton ,&nbsp;Carter T. Atkinson ,&nbsp;Robert C. Fleischer ,&nbsp;Jeffrey T. Foster ,&nbsp;A. Marm Kilpatrick","doi":"10.1016/j.ijpara.2023.10.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><em>Plasmodium</em> parasites infect thousands of species and provide an exceptional system for studying host-pathogen dynamics, especially for multi-host pathogens. However, understanding these interactions requires an accurate assay of infection. Assessing <em>Plasmodium</em> infections using microscopy on blood smears often misses infections with low parasitemias (the fractions of cells infected), and biases in malaria prevalence estimates will differ among hosts that differ in mean parasitemias. We examined <em>Plasmodium relictum</em> infection and parasitemia using both microscopy of blood smears and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) on 299 samples from multiple bird species in Hawai'i and fit models to predict parasitemias from qPCR cycle threshold (Ct) values. We used these models to quantify the extent to which microscopy underestimated infection prevalence and to more accurately estimate infection patterns for each species for a large historical study done by microscopy. We found that most qPCR-positive wild-caught birds in Hawaii had low parasitemias (Ct scores ≥35), which were rarely detected by microscopy. The fraction of infections missed by microscopy differed substantially among eight species due to differences in species’ parasitemia levels. Infection prevalence was likely 4–5-fold higher than previous microscopy estimates for three introduced species, including <em>Zosterops japonicus</em>, Hawaii’s most abundant forest bird, which had low average parasitemias. In contrast, prevalence was likely only 1.5–2.3-fold higher than previous estimates for <em>Himatione sanguinea</em> and <em>Chlorodrepanis virens</em>, two native species with high average parasitemias. Our results indicate that relative patterns of infection among species differ substantially from those observed in previous microscopy studies, and that differences depend on variation in parasitemias among species. Although microscopy of blood smears is useful for estimating the frequency of different <em>Plasmodium</em> stages and host attributes, more sensitive quantitative methods, including qPCR, are needed to accurately estimate and compare infection prevalence among host species.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":13725,"journal":{"name":"International journal for parasitology","volume":"54 2","pages":"Pages 123-130"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal for parasitology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020751923002047","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PARASITOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Plasmodium parasites infect thousands of species and provide an exceptional system for studying host-pathogen dynamics, especially for multi-host pathogens. However, understanding these interactions requires an accurate assay of infection. Assessing Plasmodium infections using microscopy on blood smears often misses infections with low parasitemias (the fractions of cells infected), and biases in malaria prevalence estimates will differ among hosts that differ in mean parasitemias. We examined Plasmodium relictum infection and parasitemia using both microscopy of blood smears and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) on 299 samples from multiple bird species in Hawai'i and fit models to predict parasitemias from qPCR cycle threshold (Ct) values. We used these models to quantify the extent to which microscopy underestimated infection prevalence and to more accurately estimate infection patterns for each species for a large historical study done by microscopy. We found that most qPCR-positive wild-caught birds in Hawaii had low parasitemias (Ct scores ≥35), which were rarely detected by microscopy. The fraction of infections missed by microscopy differed substantially among eight species due to differences in species’ parasitemia levels. Infection prevalence was likely 4–5-fold higher than previous microscopy estimates for three introduced species, including Zosterops japonicus, Hawaii’s most abundant forest bird, which had low average parasitemias. In contrast, prevalence was likely only 1.5–2.3-fold higher than previous estimates for Himatione sanguinea and Chlorodrepanis virens, two native species with high average parasitemias. Our results indicate that relative patterns of infection among species differ substantially from those observed in previous microscopy studies, and that differences depend on variation in parasitemias among species. Although microscopy of blood smears is useful for estimating the frequency of different Plasmodium stages and host attributes, more sensitive quantitative methods, including qPCR, are needed to accurately estimate and compare infection prevalence among host species.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将定量PCR和显微镜下对禽疟疾寄生虫病的估计联系起来,揭示了夏威夷的新感染模式。
疟原虫感染数千种物种,为研究宿主-病原体动力学,特别是多宿主病原体提供了一个特殊的系统。然而,了解这些相互作用需要对感染进行准确的检测。使用血液涂片显微镜评估疟原虫感染通常会漏掉低寄生虫血症(感染细胞的部分)的感染,并且疟疾流行率估计的偏差在平均寄生虫血症不同的宿主之间会有所不同。我们使用血液涂片显微镜和定量聚合酶链式反应(qPCR)对夏威夷多种鸟类的299个样本进行了残余疟原虫感染和寄生虫病检测,并根据qPCR循环阈值(Ct)值拟合模型预测寄生虫病。我们使用这些模型来量化显微镜低估感染率的程度,并更准确地估计显微镜进行的大型历史研究中每个物种的感染模式。我们发现,夏威夷大多数qPCR阳性的野生捕获鸟类都有较低的寄生虫血症(Ct评分≥35),而显微镜很少检测到这种情况。由于物种寄生虫血症水平的差异,显微镜下遗漏的感染比例在八个物种之间有很大差异。三种引入物种的感染率可能比之前显微镜下估计的高4-5倍,其中包括夏威夷最丰富的森林鸟类日本Zosterops japonicus,其平均寄生虫病率较低。相比之下,Himatine sangeea和Chlorodrepanis virens这两种平均寄生虫病率较高的本土物种的患病率可能仅比之前的估计高1.5-2.3倍。我们的研究结果表明,物种之间的相对感染模式与之前的显微镜研究中观察到的有很大差异,并且差异取决于物种之间寄生虫病的变化。尽管血液涂片的显微镜检查有助于估计不同疟原虫阶段的频率和宿主属性,但需要更敏感的定量方法,包括qPCR,来准确估计和比较宿主物种的感染率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
2.50%
发文量
76
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: International Journal for Parasitology offers authors the option to sponsor nonsubscriber access to their articles on Elsevier electronic publishing platforms. For more information please view our Sponsored Articles page. The International Journal for Parasitology publishes the results of original research in all aspects of basic and applied parasitology, including all the fields covered by its Specialist Editors, and ranging from parasites and host-parasite relationships of intrinsic biological interest to those of social and economic importance in human and veterinary medicine and agriculture.
期刊最新文献
Bat microfilariae in the cityscape: a transmission tale between bats, mites, and bat flies. Mitogenomic analysis of the position of the Azygiidae and constituent genera, with a new species of Azygia. Dense aquatic vegetation can reduce parasite transmission to amphibians. The microRNAome of Strongylus vulgaris larvae and their excretory/secretory products with identification of parasite-derived microRNAs in horse arterial tissue. A footworm in the door: revising Onchocerca phylogeny with previously unknown cryptic species in wild North American ungulates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1