Artificial Intelligence for Detection of Dementia Using Motion Data: A Scoping Review.

IF 1.4 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Extra Pub Date : 2023-09-13 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1159/000533693
Lily Puterman-Salzman, Jory Katz, Howard Bergman, Roland Grad, Vladimir Khanassov, Genevieve Gore, Isabelle Vedel, Machelle Wilchesky, Narges Armanfard, Negar Ghourchian, Samira Abbasgholizadeh Rahimi
{"title":"Artificial Intelligence for Detection of Dementia Using Motion Data: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Lily Puterman-Salzman, Jory Katz, Howard Bergman, Roland Grad, Vladimir Khanassov, Genevieve Gore, Isabelle Vedel, Machelle Wilchesky, Narges Armanfard, Negar Ghourchian, Samira Abbasgholizadeh Rahimi","doi":"10.1159/000533693","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dementia is a neurodegenerative disease resulting in the loss of cognitive and psychological functions. Artificial intelligence (AI) may help in detection and screening of dementia; however, little is known in this area.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective of this study was to identify and evaluate AI interventions for detection of dementia using motion data.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The review followed the framework proposed by O'Malley's and Joanna Briggs Institute methodological guidance for scoping reviews. We adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist for reporting the results. An information specialist performed a comprehensive search from the date of inception until November 2020, in five bibliographic databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science Core Collection, CINAHL, and IEEE Xplore. We included studies aimed at the deployment and testing or implementation of AI interventions using motion data for the detection of dementia among a diverse population, encompassing varying age, sex, gender, economic backgrounds, and ethnicity, extending to their health care providers across multiple health care settings. Studies were excluded if they focused on Parkinson's or Huntington's disease. Two independent reviewers screened the abstracts, titles, and then read the full-texts. Disagreements were resolved by consensus, and if this was not possible, the opinion of a third reviewer was sought. The reference lists of included studies were also screened.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After removing duplicates, 2,632 articles were obtained. After title and abstract screening and full-text screening, 839 articles were considered for categorization. The authors categorized the papers into six categories, and data extraction and synthesis was performed on 20 included papers from the motion tracking data category. The included studies assessed cognitive performance (<i>n</i> = 5, 25%); screened dementia and cognitive decline (<i>n</i> = 8, 40%); investigated visual behaviours (<i>n</i> = 4, 20%); and analyzed motor behaviors (<i>n</i> = 3, 15%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We presented evidence of AI systems being employed in the detection of dementia, showcasing the promising potential of motion tracking within this domain. Although some progress has been made in this field recently, there remain notable research gaps that require further exploration and investigation. Future endeavors need to compare AI interventions using motion data with traditional screening methods or other tech-enabled dementia detection mechanisms. Besides, future works should aim at understanding how gender and sex, and ethnic and cultural sensitivity can contribute to refining AI interventions, ensuring they are accessible, equitable, and beneficial across all society.</p>","PeriodicalId":38017,"journal":{"name":"Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Extra","volume":"13 1","pages":"28-38"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10624450/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Extra","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000533693","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Dementia is a neurodegenerative disease resulting in the loss of cognitive and psychological functions. Artificial intelligence (AI) may help in detection and screening of dementia; however, little is known in this area.

Objectives: The objective of this study was to identify and evaluate AI interventions for detection of dementia using motion data.

Method: The review followed the framework proposed by O'Malley's and Joanna Briggs Institute methodological guidance for scoping reviews. We adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist for reporting the results. An information specialist performed a comprehensive search from the date of inception until November 2020, in five bibliographic databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science Core Collection, CINAHL, and IEEE Xplore. We included studies aimed at the deployment and testing or implementation of AI interventions using motion data for the detection of dementia among a diverse population, encompassing varying age, sex, gender, economic backgrounds, and ethnicity, extending to their health care providers across multiple health care settings. Studies were excluded if they focused on Parkinson's or Huntington's disease. Two independent reviewers screened the abstracts, titles, and then read the full-texts. Disagreements were resolved by consensus, and if this was not possible, the opinion of a third reviewer was sought. The reference lists of included studies were also screened.

Results: After removing duplicates, 2,632 articles were obtained. After title and abstract screening and full-text screening, 839 articles were considered for categorization. The authors categorized the papers into six categories, and data extraction and synthesis was performed on 20 included papers from the motion tracking data category. The included studies assessed cognitive performance (n = 5, 25%); screened dementia and cognitive decline (n = 8, 40%); investigated visual behaviours (n = 4, 20%); and analyzed motor behaviors (n = 3, 15%).

Conclusions: We presented evidence of AI systems being employed in the detection of dementia, showcasing the promising potential of motion tracking within this domain. Although some progress has been made in this field recently, there remain notable research gaps that require further exploration and investigation. Future endeavors need to compare AI interventions using motion data with traditional screening methods or other tech-enabled dementia detection mechanisms. Besides, future works should aim at understanding how gender and sex, and ethnic and cultural sensitivity can contribute to refining AI interventions, ensuring they are accessible, equitable, and beneficial across all society.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用运动数据检测痴呆症的人工智能:范围界定综述。
背景:痴呆症是一种导致认知和心理功能丧失的神经退行性疾病。人工智能(AI)可能有助于痴呆症的检测和筛查;然而,在这方面知之甚少。目的:本研究的目的是利用运动数据识别和评估人工智能干预措施对痴呆症的检测。方法:审查遵循了奥马利和乔安娜·布里格斯研究所提出的范围审查方法指南框架。我们遵循系统评价的首选报告项目和范围界定评价的荟萃分析扩展(PRISMA ScR)检查表来报告结果。一位信息专家从成立之日到2020年11月,在五个书目数据库中进行了全面搜索:MEDLINE、EMBASE、Web of Science Core Collection、CINAHL和IEEE Xplore。我们纳入了旨在部署、测试或实施人工智能干预措施的研究,这些干预措施使用运动数据在不同人群中检测痴呆症,包括不同的年龄、性别、性别、经济背景和种族,并扩展到多个医疗保健环境中的医疗保健提供者。如果研究的重点是帕金森氏症或亨廷顿舞蹈症,则被排除在外。两名独立评审员对摘要、标题进行筛选,然后阅读全文。分歧以协商一致的方式解决,如果不可能,则征求第三位审查员的意见。纳入研究的参考文献列表也进行了筛选。结果:去除重复项后,共获得2632篇文章。经过标题和摘要筛选以及全文筛选,839篇文章被考虑进行分类。作者将论文分为六类,并对运动跟踪数据类别中的20篇论文进行了数据提取和合成。纳入的研究评估了认知表现(n=5/25%);筛查痴呆和认知能力下降(n=8.40%);调查的视觉行为(n=4,20%);并分析了运动行为(n=3,15%)。结论:我们提供了人工智能系统用于痴呆症检测的证据,展示了该领域运动跟踪的潜力。尽管最近在这一领域取得了一些进展,但仍存在显著的研究空白,需要进一步探索和调查。未来的努力需要将使用运动数据的人工智能干预与传统的筛查方法或其他技术支持的痴呆症检测机制进行比较。此外,未来的工作应旨在了解性别和性别以及种族和文化敏感性如何有助于完善人工智能干预措施,确保这些干预措施在整个社会都是可获得的、公平的和有益的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Extra
Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Extra Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: This open access and online-only journal publishes original articles covering the entire spectrum of cognitive dysfunction such as Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease, Huntington’s chorea and other neurodegenerative diseases. The journal draws from diverse related research disciplines such as psychogeriatrics, neuropsychology, clinical neurology, morphology, physiology, genetic molecular biology, pathology, biochemistry, immunology, pharmacology and pharmaceutics. Strong emphasis is placed on the publication of research findings from animal studies which are complemented by clinical and therapeutic experience to give an overall appreciation of the field. Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Extra provides additional contents based on reviewed and accepted submissions to the main journal Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Extra .
期刊最新文献
The Development of an Intradisciplinary Staff Training Intervention on the Optimal Management of Behavioural and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia: A Qualitative Study. Fear of Dementia among Middle-Aged and Older Adults in Germany. Characteristics of Alzheimer's Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment Influenced by the Time of Onset. Prevalence of Geriatric Syndromes among Older Outpatients with Dementia. Criterion-Related Validity of the Cognitive Function Score with the Revised Hasegawa's Dementia Scale and the Bedriddenness Rank with the Barthel Index and the Katz Index: A Multi-Center Retrospective Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1