Home births as a "right" of female patients in the context of medicine, legislation and court jurisprudence.

IF 0.5 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Ceska Gynekologie-Czech Gynaecology Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.48095/cccg2023390
Andrea Erdősová, Petra Gašparová, Zuzana Ballová, Erik Dosedla
{"title":"Home births as a \"right\" of female patients in the context of medicine, legislation and court jurisprudence.","authors":"Andrea Erdősová, Petra Gašparová, Zuzana Ballová, Erik Dosedla","doi":"10.48095/cccg2023390","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Currently, in the Czech Republic and Slovakia, more and more women prefer a planned home birth to a hospital birth, despite the fact that the hospital provides a safe environment for laboring women, thanks to the possibility to intervene at any time in case of complications. These women consider childbirth a natural process, while obstetric care is often considered unnecessary. According to the World Health Organization, birth can only be defined as physiological after birth. Even though women can give birth without medical assistance, it is not possible to identify in advance the mothers and newborns who will need some kind of intervention during childbirth. Although a planned home birth is associated with fewer maternal interventions and the probability of a spontaneous vaginal birth, compared to a planned hospital birth, the risk of neonatal death is two- to three-times higher.</p>","PeriodicalId":43333,"journal":{"name":"Ceska Gynekologie-Czech Gynaecology","volume":"88 5","pages":"390-396"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ceska Gynekologie-Czech Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48095/cccg2023390","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Currently, in the Czech Republic and Slovakia, more and more women prefer a planned home birth to a hospital birth, despite the fact that the hospital provides a safe environment for laboring women, thanks to the possibility to intervene at any time in case of complications. These women consider childbirth a natural process, while obstetric care is often considered unnecessary. According to the World Health Organization, birth can only be defined as physiological after birth. Even though women can give birth without medical assistance, it is not possible to identify in advance the mothers and newborns who will need some kind of intervention during childbirth. Although a planned home birth is associated with fewer maternal interventions and the probability of a spontaneous vaginal birth, compared to a planned hospital birth, the risk of neonatal death is two- to three-times higher.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在医学、立法和法院判例中,在家分娩是女性患者的一项“权利”。
目前,在捷克共和国和斯洛伐克,越来越多的妇女更喜欢计划在家分娩,而不是在医院分娩,尽管医院为分娩妇女提供了一个安全的环境,因为在出现并发症时可以随时进行干预。这些妇女认为分娩是一个自然过程,而产科护理往往被认为是不必要的。根据世界卫生组织的说法,出生只能被定义为出生后的生理状态。即使妇女可以在没有医疗援助的情况下分娩,也不可能提前确定分娩期间需要某种干预的母亲和新生儿。尽管计划在家分娩与较少的产妇干预和自发性阴道分娩的概率有关,但与计划在医院分娩相比,新生儿死亡的风险高出两到三倍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ceska Gynekologie-Czech Gynaecology
Ceska Gynekologie-Czech Gynaecology OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
25.00%
发文量
57
期刊最新文献
Birth plan - legal and medical aspects. Discrepancies in staging and perioperative classification of pelvic endometriosis according to #Enzian 2021. Female orgasm, reproduction and couple relationships. Importance of vaginal packing after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy - retrospective study. New recommendations for informing patients and gamete donors in assisted reproduction.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1