Cross-cultural invariance of the Spanish version of the COVID-19 Assessment Scorecard to measure the perception of government actions against COVID-19 in Latin America.

IF 1.5 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Psicologia-Reflexao E Critica Pub Date : 2023-11-08 DOI:10.1186/s41155-023-00277-9
Tomás Caycho-Rodríguez, Pablo D Valencia, José Ventura-León, Carlos Carbajal-León, Lindsey W Vilca, Mario Reyes-Bossio, Mariel Delgado-Campusano, Daniel E Yupanqui-Lorenzo, Rubí Paredes-Angeles, Claudio Rojas-Jara, Miguel Gallegos, Mauricio Cervigni, Pablo Martino, Roberto Polanco-Carrasco, Diego Alejandro Palacios, Rodrigo Moreta-Herrera, Antonio Samaniego-Pinho, Marlon Elías Lobos Rivera, Andrés Buschiazzo Figares, Diana Ximena Puerta-Cortés, Ibraín Enrique Corrales-Reyes, Raymundo Calderón, Walter L Arias Gallegos, Olimpia Petzold, Andrés Camargo, Julio Torales, J Arkangel Monge Blanco, Pedronel González, Vanessa Smith-Castro, Wendy Yamilet Matute Rivera, Daniela Ferrufino-Borja, Paula Ceballos-Vásquez, Agueda Muñoz-Del-Carpio-Toia, Jorge Palacios, Carmen Burgos-Videla, Ana María Eduviges Florez León, Ibeth Vergara, Diego Vega, Nicol A Barria-Asenjo, Marion K Schulmeyer, Hassell Tatiana Urrutia Rios, Arelly Esther Lira Lira
{"title":"Cross-cultural invariance of the Spanish version of the COVID-19 Assessment Scorecard to measure the perception of government actions against COVID-19 in Latin America.","authors":"Tomás Caycho-Rodríguez, Pablo D Valencia, José Ventura-León, Carlos Carbajal-León, Lindsey W Vilca, Mario Reyes-Bossio, Mariel Delgado-Campusano, Daniel E Yupanqui-Lorenzo, Rubí Paredes-Angeles, Claudio Rojas-Jara, Miguel Gallegos, Mauricio Cervigni, Pablo Martino, Roberto Polanco-Carrasco, Diego Alejandro Palacios, Rodrigo Moreta-Herrera, Antonio Samaniego-Pinho, Marlon Elías Lobos Rivera, Andrés Buschiazzo Figares, Diana Ximena Puerta-Cortés, Ibraín Enrique Corrales-Reyes, Raymundo Calderón, Walter L Arias Gallegos, Olimpia Petzold, Andrés Camargo, Julio Torales, J Arkangel Monge Blanco, Pedronel González, Vanessa Smith-Castro, Wendy Yamilet Matute Rivera, Daniela Ferrufino-Borja, Paula Ceballos-Vásquez, Agueda Muñoz-Del-Carpio-Toia, Jorge Palacios, Carmen Burgos-Videla, Ana María Eduviges Florez León, Ibeth Vergara, Diego Vega, Nicol A Barria-Asenjo, Marion K Schulmeyer, Hassell Tatiana Urrutia Rios, Arelly Esther Lira Lira","doi":"10.1186/s41155-023-00277-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The present study aimed to evaluate the measurement invariance of a general measure of the perception of governmental responses to COVID-|19 (COVID-SCORE-10) in the general population of 13 Latin American countries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 5780 individuals from 13 Latin American and Caribbean countries selected by non-probabilistic snowball sampling participated. A confirmatory factor analysis was performed and the alignment method was used to evaluate invariance. Additionally, a graded response model was used for the assessment of item characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results indicate that there is approximate measurement invariance of the COVID-SCORE-10 among the participating countries. Furthermore, IRT results suggest that the COVID-SCORE-10 measures with good psychometric ability a broad spectrum of the construct assessed, especially around average levels. Comparison of COVID-SCORE-10 scores indicated that participants from Cuba, Uruguay and El Salvador had the most positive perceptions of government actions to address the pandemic. Thus, the underlying construct of perception of government actions was equivalent in all countries.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results show the importance of initially establishing the fundamental measurement properties and MI before inferring the cross-cultural universality of the construct to be measured.</p>","PeriodicalId":46901,"journal":{"name":"Psicologia-Reflexao E Critica","volume":"36 1","pages":"34"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10632328/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psicologia-Reflexao E Critica","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41155-023-00277-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objectives: The present study aimed to evaluate the measurement invariance of a general measure of the perception of governmental responses to COVID-|19 (COVID-SCORE-10) in the general population of 13 Latin American countries.

Methods: A total of 5780 individuals from 13 Latin American and Caribbean countries selected by non-probabilistic snowball sampling participated. A confirmatory factor analysis was performed and the alignment method was used to evaluate invariance. Additionally, a graded response model was used for the assessment of item characteristics.

Results: The results indicate that there is approximate measurement invariance of the COVID-SCORE-10 among the participating countries. Furthermore, IRT results suggest that the COVID-SCORE-10 measures with good psychometric ability a broad spectrum of the construct assessed, especially around average levels. Comparison of COVID-SCORE-10 scores indicated that participants from Cuba, Uruguay and El Salvador had the most positive perceptions of government actions to address the pandemic. Thus, the underlying construct of perception of government actions was equivalent in all countries.

Conclusion: The results show the importance of initially establishing the fundamental measurement properties and MI before inferring the cross-cultural universality of the construct to be measured.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
西班牙版新冠肺炎评估记分卡的跨文化不变性,用于衡量拉丁美洲政府应对新冠肺炎行动的看法。
目的:本研究旨在评估13个拉丁美洲国家普通人群对政府应对新冠肺炎的感知的一般测量(COVID-SCORE-10)的测量不变性。方法:通过非概率滚雪球抽样,从13个拉丁美洲和加勒比国家选出5780人参加。进行了验证性因素分析,并使用比对方法来评估不变性。此外,还使用了一个分级反应模型来评估项目特征。结果:结果表明,在参与国之间,COVID-SCORE-10具有近似的测量不变性。此外,IRT结果表明,COVID-SCORE-10以良好的心理测量能力测量所评估的构建体的广泛范围,尤其是在平均水平附近。对COVID-SCORE-10评分的比较表明,来自古巴、乌拉圭和萨尔瓦多的参与者对政府应对疫情的行动有最积极的看法。因此,对政府行为的基本认知结构在所有国家都是相同的。结论:研究结果表明,在推断待测结构的跨文化普遍性之前,首先确定基本测量特性和MI的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psicologia-Reflexao E Critica
Psicologia-Reflexao E Critica PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: Psicologia: Reflexão & Crítica is a journal published three times a year by Programa de Pós-Graduação em Psicologia do Desenvolvimento (Psychology Graduate Program) of the Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul - UFRGS (Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul). Its objective is to publish original works in the psychology field: articles, short reports on research and reviews as well as to present to the scientific community texts which reflect a significant contribution for the psychology field. The short title of the journal is Psicol. Refl. Crít. It must be used regarding bibliographies, footnotes, as well as bibliographical strips and references.
期刊最新文献
Parent autonomy support and undergraduates' academic engagement in online learning: the mediate role of self-regulation. Morpho-orthographic segmentation on visual word recognition in Brazilian Portuguese speakers. The gaming disorder test and gaming disorder scale for adolescents: translation and validation among Vietnamese young adults. Adaptation of the normative rating procedure for the International Affective Picture System to a remote format. Psychometric properties of the Parenting Stress Index-Short Form in a Peruvian sample.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1