Does Initiation of Prophylactic Antiseizure Medication Improve Neurological Outcomes in Patients With Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage?: A Critically Appraised Topic.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurologist Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI:10.1097/NRL.0000000000000537
Nikita Chhabra, Amy Z Crepeau, Bart M Demaerschalk, Molly G Knox, William David Freeman, Cristina Valencia Sanchez, Lisa A Marks, Cumara B O'Carroll
{"title":"Does Initiation of Prophylactic Antiseizure Medication Improve Neurological Outcomes in Patients With Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage?: A Critically Appraised Topic.","authors":"Nikita Chhabra,&nbsp;Amy Z Crepeau,&nbsp;Bart M Demaerschalk,&nbsp;Molly G Knox,&nbsp;William David Freeman,&nbsp;Cristina Valencia Sanchez,&nbsp;Lisa A Marks,&nbsp;Cumara B O'Carroll","doi":"10.1097/NRL.0000000000000537","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to critically assess current evidence regarding the role of prophylactic antiseizure medication in patients presenting with acute intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The objective was addressed through the development of a structured critically appraised topic. This included a clinical scenario with a clinical question, literature search strategy, critical appraisal, results, evidence summary, commentary, and bottom-line conclusions. Participants included resident neurologists, a medical librarian, and content experts in the fields of epilepsy, stroke neurology, neurohospitalist medicine, and neurocritical care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A randomized clinical trial was selected for critical appraisal. The trial assessed whether prophylactic levetiracetam (LEV) use reduced the risk of acute seizures in patients with ICH, as defined by clinical or electrographic seizure, captured by continuous electroencephalogram 72 hours after enrollment. A total of 42 patients were included in the final analysis (19 in the LEV group and 23 in the placebo group). There was a significantly higher occurrence of seizures in the placebo versus LEV group (LEV 16% vs placebo 43%, P = 0.043). There were no differences in functional outcomes between the groups at 3, 6, or 12 months (P > 0.1).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The role of prophylactic treatment with antiseizure medication in ICH remains unclear.</p>","PeriodicalId":49758,"journal":{"name":"Neurologist","volume":"28 6","pages":"422-425"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10627540/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NRL.0000000000000537","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to critically assess current evidence regarding the role of prophylactic antiseizure medication in patients presenting with acute intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH).

Methods: The objective was addressed through the development of a structured critically appraised topic. This included a clinical scenario with a clinical question, literature search strategy, critical appraisal, results, evidence summary, commentary, and bottom-line conclusions. Participants included resident neurologists, a medical librarian, and content experts in the fields of epilepsy, stroke neurology, neurohospitalist medicine, and neurocritical care.

Results: A randomized clinical trial was selected for critical appraisal. The trial assessed whether prophylactic levetiracetam (LEV) use reduced the risk of acute seizures in patients with ICH, as defined by clinical or electrographic seizure, captured by continuous electroencephalogram 72 hours after enrollment. A total of 42 patients were included in the final analysis (19 in the LEV group and 23 in the placebo group). There was a significantly higher occurrence of seizures in the placebo versus LEV group (LEV 16% vs placebo 43%, P = 0.043). There were no differences in functional outcomes between the groups at 3, 6, or 12 months (P > 0.1).

Conclusions: The role of prophylactic treatment with antiseizure medication in ICH remains unclear.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
预防性反麻醉药物的使用是否能改善急性脑出血患者的神经系统结果?:经过批判性评价的主题。
目的:本研究的目的是严格评估目前关于预防性抗癫痫药物在急性脑出血(ICH)患者中作用的证据。方法:通过开发一个结构化的严格评估主题来解决该目标。这包括一个带有临床问题的临床场景、文献检索策略、批判性评估、结果、证据总结、评论和底线结论。参与者包括住院神经学家、医学图书馆员以及癫痫、中风神经病学、神经住院医学和神经重症监护领域的内容专家。结果:选择一项随机临床试验进行危重症评估。该试验评估了预防性左乙拉西坦(LEV)的使用是否降低了ICH患者急性发作的风险,ICH是指在入组后72小时通过连续脑电图捕捉到的临床或脑电图发作。共有42名患者被纳入最终分析(LEV组19名,安慰剂组23名)。安慰剂组癫痫发作的发生率明显高于LEV组(LEV组为16%,安慰剂组为43%,P=0.043)。在3个月、6个月或12个月时,两组的功能结果没有差异(P>0.05)。结论:抗癫痫药物预防性治疗在脑出血中的作用尚不清楚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neurologist
Neurologist 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
151
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Neurologist publishes articles on topics of current interest to physicians treating patients with neurological diseases. The core of the journal is review articles focusing on clinically relevant issues. The journal also publishes case reports or case series which review the literature and put observations in perspective, as well as letters to the editor. Special features include the popular "10 Most Commonly Asked Questions" and the "Patient and Family Fact Sheet," a handy tear-out page that can be copied to hand out to patients and their caregivers.
期刊最新文献
Stroke-Related Factors Influencing Thrombolysis Eligibility and Outcomes. Validation of an Artificial Intelligence-Powered Virtual Assistant for Emergency Triage in Neurology. Syncope Induced by Dynamic Head and Shoulder Motion in the Setting of Left Subclavian Stenosis. A Mild Phenotype of Overlapping Syndrome With Myelin-Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein and Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein Immunoglobulin G: Mimicking Viral Meningitis in a Patient. Association of Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index With Stroke and Mortality Rates: Evidence From the NHANES Database.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1