Best practices for communication while wearing facemasks: A scoping review

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Journal of Nursing Scholarship Pub Date : 2023-11-08 DOI:10.1111/jnu.12939
Clarissa A. Shaw PhD, RN, Kyu Ri Lee MSN, RN, Alexander Williams BSN, RN, Nathan A. Shaw MD, Delaney Weeks BSN, RN, Lainie Jackson BSN, RN, Kristine N. Williams PhD, FNP-BC, RN, FGSA, FAAN
{"title":"Best practices for communication while wearing facemasks: A scoping review","authors":"Clarissa A. Shaw PhD, RN,&nbsp;Kyu Ri Lee MSN, RN,&nbsp;Alexander Williams BSN, RN,&nbsp;Nathan A. Shaw MD,&nbsp;Delaney Weeks BSN, RN,&nbsp;Lainie Jackson BSN, RN,&nbsp;Kristine N. Williams PhD, FNP-BC, RN, FGSA, FAAN","doi":"10.1111/jnu.12939","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Facemasks are an important piece of personal protective equipment (PPE) to mitigate the spread of respiratory illnesses, but they can impede communication between patients and healthcare providers. The purpose of this scoping review is to identify effective communication practices while wearing facemasks.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>Scoping review using a systematic search of articles from the PubMed, CINAHL, and Embase databases.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The PEO (population, exposure, outcome) methodology was selected for this systematic scoping review. The population of interest (P) includes humans of all ages (children, adults, and older adults); the exposure of interest (E) is PPE that covers the mouth (i.e., facemasks); and the outcome of interest (O) is successful or unsuccessful communication practices. The Johns Hopkins Evidence-Based Practice for Nurses and Healthcare Professionals appraisal guidelines were used to determine the level and quality of the research.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Thirty-nine articles met the inclusion criteria. Seventeen of these were high- or good-quality research studies, and the remaining 22 were non-research articles included with separate analysis as part of the scoping review. The 17 articles encompassed 2656 participants. The highest quality evidence indicated that standard surgical masks have the least impact on speech perception compared to other non-transparent mask types, and that recognizing emotions is less accurate with facemasks, necessitating compensatory actions (i.e., reducing extraneous noise, using a microphone to amplify voice, and employing clear speech). Evidence was contradictory regarding the use of transparent masks. Evidence was of limited quality for other non-verbal and verbal communication strategies.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Awareness of communication challenges is crucial when wearing facemasks. More high-quality studies are needed to evaluate communication techniques when speakers are wearing facemasks. Basic strategies such as selecting an appropriate mask type, reducing extraneous noise, using microphones, verbalizing emotions, and employing clear speech appear to be beneficial.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Clinical Relevance</h3>\n \n <p>The findings of this scoping review highlight the importance of considering communication challenges while wearing facemasks in the healthcare settings. The review suggests that selecting an appropriate mask type, reducing extraneous noise, verbalizing emotions, and employing clear speech are some strategies that may be effective in mitigating the impact of facemasks on communication between patients and healthcare providers.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51091,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing Scholarship","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jnu.12939","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nursing Scholarship","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jnu.12939","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Facemasks are an important piece of personal protective equipment (PPE) to mitigate the spread of respiratory illnesses, but they can impede communication between patients and healthcare providers. The purpose of this scoping review is to identify effective communication practices while wearing facemasks.

Design

Scoping review using a systematic search of articles from the PubMed, CINAHL, and Embase databases.

Methods

The PEO (population, exposure, outcome) methodology was selected for this systematic scoping review. The population of interest (P) includes humans of all ages (children, adults, and older adults); the exposure of interest (E) is PPE that covers the mouth (i.e., facemasks); and the outcome of interest (O) is successful or unsuccessful communication practices. The Johns Hopkins Evidence-Based Practice for Nurses and Healthcare Professionals appraisal guidelines were used to determine the level and quality of the research.

Results

Thirty-nine articles met the inclusion criteria. Seventeen of these were high- or good-quality research studies, and the remaining 22 were non-research articles included with separate analysis as part of the scoping review. The 17 articles encompassed 2656 participants. The highest quality evidence indicated that standard surgical masks have the least impact on speech perception compared to other non-transparent mask types, and that recognizing emotions is less accurate with facemasks, necessitating compensatory actions (i.e., reducing extraneous noise, using a microphone to amplify voice, and employing clear speech). Evidence was contradictory regarding the use of transparent masks. Evidence was of limited quality for other non-verbal and verbal communication strategies.

Conclusion

Awareness of communication challenges is crucial when wearing facemasks. More high-quality studies are needed to evaluate communication techniques when speakers are wearing facemasks. Basic strategies such as selecting an appropriate mask type, reducing extraneous noise, using microphones, verbalizing emotions, and employing clear speech appear to be beneficial.

Clinical Relevance

The findings of this scoping review highlight the importance of considering communication challenges while wearing facemasks in the healthcare settings. The review suggests that selecting an appropriate mask type, reducing extraneous noise, verbalizing emotions, and employing clear speech are some strategies that may be effective in mitigating the impact of facemasks on communication between patients and healthcare providers.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
戴口罩交流的最佳实践:范围界定综述。
简介:口罩是一种重要的个人防护装备,可以缓解呼吸道疾病的传播,但它们会阻碍患者和医疗保健提供者之间的沟通。本范围审查的目的是确定戴口罩时的有效沟通做法。设计:通过系统检索PubMed、CINAHL和Embase数据库中的文章进行范围界定审查。方法:选择PEO(人群、暴露、结果)方法进行系统范围审查。感兴趣的人群(P)包括所有年龄段的人(儿童、成人和老年人);感兴趣的暴露(E)是覆盖口腔的PPE(即面罩);并且感兴趣的结果(O)是成功或不成功的通信实践。约翰斯·霍普金斯大学护士和医疗保健专业人员循证实践评估指南用于确定研究的水平和质量。结果:39篇文章符合入选标准。其中17篇是高质量或高质量的研究,其余22篇是非研究文章,作为范围审查的一部分,包含单独的分析。这17篇文章涉及2656名参与者。最高质量的证据表明,与其他不透明口罩类型相比,标准外科口罩对言语感知的影响最小,戴口罩识别情绪的准确性较低,因此需要采取补偿措施(即减少外来噪音、使用麦克风放大声音和使用清晰的语音)。关于使用透明口罩的证据是矛盾的。其他非言语和言语交流策略的证据质量有限。结论:戴口罩时,对沟通挑战的认识至关重要。需要更多高质量的研究来评估演讲者戴口罩时的沟通技巧。选择合适的口罩类型、减少外来噪音、使用麦克风、表达情感和使用清晰的语言等基本策略似乎是有益的。临床相关性:这项范围界定审查的结果强调了在医疗环境中戴口罩时考虑沟通挑战的重要性。该综述表明,选择合适的口罩类型、减少外来噪音、表达情绪和使用清晰的语言是一些可能有效减轻口罩对患者和医疗保健提供者之间沟通影响的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
85
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: This widely read and respected journal features peer-reviewed, thought-provoking articles representing research by some of the world’s leading nurse researchers. Reaching health professionals, faculty and students in 103 countries, the Journal of Nursing Scholarship is focused on health of people throughout the world. It is the official journal of Sigma Theta Tau International and it reflects the society’s dedication to providing the tools necessary to improve nursing care around the world.
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness of integrated care models for stroke patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Decoding machine learning in nursing research: A scoping review of effective algorithms. The effects of applying artificial intelligence to triage in the emergency department: A systematic review of prospective studies Issue Information Machine learning methods to discover hidden patterns in well-being and resilience for healthy aging.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1