Burnout in emergency department staff: The prevalence and barriers to intervention.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY South African Journal of Psychiatry Pub Date : 2023-10-23 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.4102/sajpsychiatry.v29i0.2095
Reshen Naidoo, Renata Schoeman
{"title":"Burnout in emergency department staff: The prevalence and barriers to intervention.","authors":"Reshen Naidoo,&nbsp;Renata Schoeman","doi":"10.4102/sajpsychiatry.v29i0.2095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Burnout impacts patient care and staff well-being. Emergency department (ED) staff are at an elevated risk for burnout. Despite an acceleration in burnout research due to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, there is limited data on the nature and prevalence of burnout in the South African emergency medicine setting.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study determined the prevalence of burnout in ED staff (doctors, nurses and non-clinical staff) at Tygerberg Hospital and explored staff awareness and utilisation of interventions.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The study was conducted at Tygerberg Hospital, South Africa.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study used the Maslach Burnout Inventory to assess burnout via a self-administered electronic survey in a convenience sample of 109 ED staff. Quantitative data were analysed with descriptive and inferential statistics. Qualitative data were analysed using thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 46 participants (45.10%) experienced burnout, with 73 participants (71.57%) at high risk for emotional exhaustion or depersonalisation. The prevalence of burnout in doctors was 57.89%, non-clinical staff was 25.93%, and nursing staff was 50.00%. Burnout was higher in doctors and nursing staff compared to non-clinical staff, with high emotional exhaustion and depersonalisation found in interns and specialist professional nurses. The level of intervention awareness was 41.8% and the level of intervention utilisation was 8.82%. Thematic analysis identified awareness, accessibility and reactive utilisation as barriers to utilisation with opportunities to reduce burnout and enhance resilience.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Coordinated health system and organisational efforts are required to optimise intervention strategies to reduce burnout.</p><p><strong>Contribution: </strong>Guidance on the design and planning of intervention strategies considering at risk groups, intervention-related factors, and non-clinical staff.</p>","PeriodicalId":51156,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Psychiatry","volume":"29 ","pages":"2095"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10623583/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajpsychiatry.v29i0.2095","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Burnout impacts patient care and staff well-being. Emergency department (ED) staff are at an elevated risk for burnout. Despite an acceleration in burnout research due to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, there is limited data on the nature and prevalence of burnout in the South African emergency medicine setting.

Aim: This study determined the prevalence of burnout in ED staff (doctors, nurses and non-clinical staff) at Tygerberg Hospital and explored staff awareness and utilisation of interventions.

Setting: The study was conducted at Tygerberg Hospital, South Africa.

Methods: This cross-sectional study used the Maslach Burnout Inventory to assess burnout via a self-administered electronic survey in a convenience sample of 109 ED staff. Quantitative data were analysed with descriptive and inferential statistics. Qualitative data were analysed using thematic analysis.

Results: A total of 46 participants (45.10%) experienced burnout, with 73 participants (71.57%) at high risk for emotional exhaustion or depersonalisation. The prevalence of burnout in doctors was 57.89%, non-clinical staff was 25.93%, and nursing staff was 50.00%. Burnout was higher in doctors and nursing staff compared to non-clinical staff, with high emotional exhaustion and depersonalisation found in interns and specialist professional nurses. The level of intervention awareness was 41.8% and the level of intervention utilisation was 8.82%. Thematic analysis identified awareness, accessibility and reactive utilisation as barriers to utilisation with opportunities to reduce burnout and enhance resilience.

Conclusion: Coordinated health system and organisational efforts are required to optimise intervention strategies to reduce burnout.

Contribution: Guidance on the design and planning of intervention strategies considering at risk groups, intervention-related factors, and non-clinical staff.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急诊科工作人员的倦怠:干预的普遍性和障碍。
背景:倦怠影响患者护理和员工福祉。急诊科(ED)工作人员的倦怠风险较高。尽管2019冠状病毒病(新冠肺炎)大流行加速了职业倦怠研究,但关于南非急诊医学环境中职业倦怠的性质和流行率的数据有限。目的:本研究确定了泰格堡医院急诊科工作人员(医生、护士和非临床工作人员)的倦怠发生率,并探讨了工作人员对干预措施的认识和利用情况。背景:该研究在南非的泰格堡医院进行。方法:这项横断面研究使用Maslach倦怠量表,通过一项自我管理的电子调查,对109名急诊科工作人员的便利样本进行倦怠评估。定量数据采用描述性和推断统计学方法进行分析。定性数据采用专题分析法进行分析。结果:共有46名参与者(45.10%)经历了倦怠,其中73名参与者(71.57%)面临情绪衰竭或人格解体的高风险。医生的倦怠发生率为57.89%,非临床人员为25.93%,护理人员为50.00%。与非临床人员相比,医生和护理人员的倦怠程度更高,实习生和专业护士的情绪衰竭和人格解体程度更高。干预意识水平为41.8%,干预利用率水平为8.82%。专题分析发现,意识、可及性和反应性利用是利用的障碍,有机会减少倦怠和增强韧性。结论:需要协调的卫生系统和组织努力来优化干预策略,以减少倦怠。贡献:考虑高危人群、干预相关因素和非临床工作人员的干预策略设计和规划指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
56
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal is the leading psychiatric journal of Africa. It provides open-access scholarly reading for psychiatrists, clinical psychologists and all with an interest in mental health. It carries empirical and conceptual research articles, reviews, editorials, and scientific letters related to psychiatry. It publishes work from various places in the world, and makes special provision for the interests of Africa. It seeks to serve its readership and researchers with the most topical content in psychiatry for clinical practice and academic pursuits, including work in the subspecialty areas of psychiatry.
期刊最新文献
The lifeworld of families of mental health care users in rural South Africa: A phenomenological study. Knowledge and attitudes towards electroconvulsive therapy in an academic psychiatric department. Teaching transference focused psychotherapy to South African mental health practitioners. Safety and effectiveness of methylphenidate ER multi-unit pellet system in ADHD patients: An open label study. An in depth review of body shaming phenomenon among adolescent: Trigger factors, psychological impact and prevention efforts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1