Borehole Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Estimation of Specific Yield in a Fractured Granite Aquifer

IF 2 4区 地球科学 Q3 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Groundwater Pub Date : 2023-11-06 DOI:10.1111/gwat.13374
Stephanie N. Phillips, Bradley Carr, Ye Zhang, Brady Flinchum, Shuangpo Ren
{"title":"Borehole Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Estimation of Specific Yield in a Fractured Granite Aquifer","authors":"Stephanie N. Phillips,&nbsp;Bradley Carr,&nbsp;Ye Zhang,&nbsp;Brady Flinchum,&nbsp;Shuangpo Ren","doi":"10.1111/gwat.13374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In this study, we introduce a novel field-based method to estimate specific yield (<i>S</i><sub>y</sub>) in fractured, low-porosity granite aquifers using borehole nuclear magnetic resonance (bNMR). This method requires collecting a bNMR survey immediately following a pump test, which dewaters the near-borehole fractures. The residual water content measured from bNMR is interpreted as “bound” and represents the specific retention (<i>S</i><sub>r</sub>) while the water drained by the pump is the <i>S</i><sub>y</sub>. The transverse relaxation cutoff time (<i>T</i><sub>2C</sub>) is the length of time that partitions the total porosity measured by bNMR into <i>S</i><sub>r</sub> and <i>S</i><sub>y</sub>. When applying a calibrated <i>T</i><sub>2C</sub>, <i>S</i><sub>y</sub> equals the bNMR total porosity minus <i>S</i><sub>r</sub>; thus, a calibrated <i>T</i><sub>2C</sub> is required to determine <i>S</i><sub>y</sub> directly from NMR results. Based on laboratory experiments on sandstone cores, the default <i>T</i><sub>2C</sub> is 33 ms; however, its applicability to fractured granite aquifers is uncertain. The optimal <i>T</i><sub>2C</sub> based on our pumping test is 110 ± 25 ms. Applying this calibrated <i>T</i><sub>2C</sub> on a saturated, A-type granite at our field site, we estimate the <i>S</i><sub>y</sub> to be 0.012 ± 0.005 m<sup>3</sup> m<sup>−3</sup> which is significantly different from the <i>S</i><sub>y</sub> (0.021 ± 0.005 m<sup>3</sup> m<sup>−3</sup>) estimate using the default <i>T</i><sub>2C</sub> of 33 ms. This <i>S</i><sub>y</sub> estimate falls within a range determined using traditional hydraulic testing at the same site. Using the conventional <i>T</i><sub>2C</sub> (33 ms) for fractured granite leads to an inaccurate <i>S</i><sub>y</sub>; therefore, it is essential to calibrate the bNMR <i>T</i><sub>2C</sub> for the local site conditions prior to estimating <i>S</i><sub>y</sub>.</p>","PeriodicalId":12866,"journal":{"name":"Groundwater","volume":"62 4","pages":"578-590"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Groundwater","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gwat.13374","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, we introduce a novel field-based method to estimate specific yield (Sy) in fractured, low-porosity granite aquifers using borehole nuclear magnetic resonance (bNMR). This method requires collecting a bNMR survey immediately following a pump test, which dewaters the near-borehole fractures. The residual water content measured from bNMR is interpreted as “bound” and represents the specific retention (Sr) while the water drained by the pump is the Sy. The transverse relaxation cutoff time (T2C) is the length of time that partitions the total porosity measured by bNMR into Sr and Sy. When applying a calibrated T2C, Sy equals the bNMR total porosity minus Sr; thus, a calibrated T2C is required to determine Sy directly from NMR results. Based on laboratory experiments on sandstone cores, the default T2C is 33 ms; however, its applicability to fractured granite aquifers is uncertain. The optimal T2C based on our pumping test is 110 ± 25 ms. Applying this calibrated T2C on a saturated, A-type granite at our field site, we estimate the Sy to be 0.012 ± 0.005 m3 m−3 which is significantly different from the Sy (0.021 ± 0.005 m3 m−3) estimate using the default T2C of 33 ms. This Sy estimate falls within a range determined using traditional hydraulic testing at the same site. Using the conventional T2C (33 ms) for fractured granite leads to an inaccurate Sy; therefore, it is essential to calibrate the bNMR T2C for the local site conditions prior to estimating Sy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
裂隙花岗岩含水层中特定产量的钻孔核磁共振估算。
在这项研究中,我们介绍了一种新的基于现场的方法,使用钻孔核磁共振(bNMR)来估计裂缝性低孔隙度花岗岩含水层的比产量(Sy)。这种方法需要在泵送试验后立即收集bNMR调查,从而对钻孔附近的裂缝进行脱水。bNMR测得的残余水含量被解释为“结合”,并代表特定保留率(Sr),而泵排出的水是Sy。横向弛豫截止时间(T2C)是将通过bNMR测量的总孔隙率划分为Sr和Sy的时间长度。当应用校准的T2C时,Sy等于bNMR总孔隙度减去Sr;因此,需要校准的T2C来直接从NMR结果中确定Sy。基于砂岩岩心的实验室实验,默认T2C为33毫秒;然而,它对裂隙花岗岩含水层的适用性尚不确定。根据我们的抽水试验,最佳T2C为110± 25毫秒。在我们现场的饱和a型花岗岩上应用该校准的T2C,我们估计Sy为0.012± 0.005 m3 m-3,与Sy(0.021± 0.005 m3 m-3)估计值。该Sy估计值落在使用同一地点的传统水力测试确定的范围内。对断裂的花岗岩使用传统的T2C(33ms)导致不准确的Sy;因此,在估计Sy之前,必须针对局部位点条件校准bNMR T2C。这篇文章受版权保护。保留所有权利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Groundwater
Groundwater 环境科学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.80%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: Ground Water is the leading international journal focused exclusively on ground water. Since 1963, Ground Water has published a dynamic mix of papers on topics related to ground water including ground water flow and well hydraulics, hydrogeochemistry and contaminant hydrogeology, application of geophysics, groundwater management and policy, and history of ground water hydrology. This is the journal you can count on to bring you the practical applications in ground water hydrology.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Jupyter Notebooks for Parameter Estimation, Uncertainty Analysis, and Optimization with PEST++ Remembering the Big Picture Exploring Freshwater Beneath the Ocean Floor Society News
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1