A sophisticated understanding of the three-dimensional distribution of silt- and clay-rich bodies of strata (elements) in aquifers is critical given that they not only have the potential to act as aquitards or semi-confining units and vertically partition groundwater flow into separate aquifer zones, but also provide lateral barriers to groundwater flow, impacting contaminant distribution and groundwater flow dynamics. Additionally, when in prolonged contact with dense nonaqueous phase liquid (DNAPL) or contaminated groundwater, fine-grained elements may become storage zones for contaminant mass via matrix diffusion and thus serve as long-term secondary sources of contamination to groundwater that can confound remediation strategies and render remedy performance projections unreliable. The stratigraphic architecture of aquifer systems, including fine-grained facies architecture, is complex but is not random and can be effectively predicted through application of facies models. This paper reviews depositional models (“facies models”) for common depositional environments with a focus on alluvial end-members of braided fluvial, meandering fluvial, and alluvial fan facies models. We examine the facies models from the perspective of aquitards and present case studies to provide an overview of the expected aquitard dimensions and characteristics. The critical yet underappreciated role of the paleosol as a potential aquitard is also examined, and basic criteria for differentiating ancient floodplain clay units with high lateral continuity from other laterally discontinuous clay units are provided.
{"title":"The Geology of Aquitards in Alluvial Aquifers: A Predictive Approach Based on Facies Models","authors":"Michael R. Shultz, Colin Plank","doi":"10.1111/gwat.70048","DOIUrl":"10.1111/gwat.70048","url":null,"abstract":"<p>A sophisticated understanding of the three-dimensional distribution of silt- and clay-rich bodies of strata (elements) in aquifers is critical given that they not only have the potential to act as aquitards or semi-confining units and vertically partition groundwater flow into separate aquifer zones, but also provide lateral barriers to groundwater flow, impacting contaminant distribution and groundwater flow dynamics. Additionally, when in prolonged contact with dense nonaqueous phase liquid (DNAPL) or contaminated groundwater, fine-grained elements may become storage zones for contaminant mass via matrix diffusion and thus serve as long-term secondary sources of contamination to groundwater that can confound remediation strategies and render remedy performance projections unreliable. The stratigraphic architecture of aquifer systems, including fine-grained facies architecture, is complex but is not random and can be effectively predicted through application of facies models. This paper reviews depositional models (“facies models”) for common depositional environments with a focus on alluvial end-members of braided fluvial, meandering fluvial, and alluvial fan facies models. We examine the facies models from the perspective of aquitards and present case studies to provide an overview of the expected aquitard dimensions and characteristics. The critical yet underappreciated role of the paleosol as a potential aquitard is also examined, and basic criteria for differentiating ancient floodplain clay units with high lateral continuity from other laterally discontinuous clay units are provided.</p>","PeriodicalId":12866,"journal":{"name":"Groundwater","volume":"64 1","pages":"30-40"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12857526/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146055704","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Leaching of marine salinity in the porewater of glaciomarine muds is one precursor to landslide hazard. In this study, groundwater modeling is used to quantify vertical groundwater flow, constrain paleosalinity, and characterize past and future progression of leaching with depth in Champlain Sea sediments. The Breckenridge Creek site, ~15 km northwest of Ottawa, Canada, was cored within a thick sequence (up to 98 m) of Champlain Sea muds that form a regional aquitard in the St. Lawrence Lowlands and Ottawa Valley. Porewater chloride concentrations ([Cl]), up to 12,250 mg/kg, and δ18O as high as −7.18‰, indicate remnant seawater. One-dimensional groundwater transport modeling simulates porewater [Cl] and δ18O with depth simultaneously and constrains specific discharge, q, from 2.40 to 2.51 mm/a. Groundwater transport modeling and three-component mixing of seawater, glacial meltwater and meteoric water constrain the range of initial [Cl] between 14,000 and 15,700 mg/kg (72–80% seawater) and initial δ18O between −5.99 and −5.61‰. The glacial meltwater component of Champlain Sea bottom waters at the Breckenridge site has a maximum δ18O value of −22.4‰. Downward leaching to the salinity threshold of <2 g/L for geotechnical sensitivity development reached a depth of 20.6 m. Modeling indicates the leaching front currently progresses at a rate of 2.5 m/1000 years, slower than advection of freshwater infiltration because of upward diffusion and dispersion of marine solutes. Notably for landslide hazard, the highest measurements of geotechnical sensitivity coincide with the leached zone.
{"title":"Groundwater Transport in a Glaciomarine Aquitard: Paleosalinity and Landslide Implications","authors":"M. J. Hinton, S. Alpay, H. L. Crow","doi":"10.1111/gwat.70045","DOIUrl":"10.1111/gwat.70045","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Leaching of marine salinity in the porewater of glaciomarine muds is one precursor to landslide hazard. In this study, groundwater modeling is used to quantify vertical groundwater flow, constrain paleosalinity, and characterize past and future progression of leaching with depth in Champlain Sea sediments. The Breckenridge Creek site, ~15 km northwest of Ottawa, Canada, was cored within a thick sequence (up to 98 m) of Champlain Sea muds that form a regional aquitard in the St. Lawrence Lowlands and Ottawa Valley. Porewater chloride concentrations ([Cl]), up to 12,250 mg/kg, and δ<sup>18</sup>O as high as −7.18‰, indicate remnant seawater. One-dimensional groundwater transport modeling simulates porewater [Cl] and δ<sup>18</sup>O with depth simultaneously and constrains specific discharge, q, from 2.40 to 2.51 mm/a. Groundwater transport modeling and three-component mixing of seawater, glacial meltwater and meteoric water constrain the range of initial [Cl] between 14,000 and 15,700 mg/kg (72–80% seawater) and initial δ<sup>18</sup>O between −5.99 and −5.61‰. The glacial meltwater component of Champlain Sea bottom waters at the Breckenridge site has a maximum δ<sup>18</sup>O value of −22.4‰. Downward leaching to the salinity threshold of <2 g/L for geotechnical sensitivity development reached a depth of 20.6 m. Modeling indicates the leaching front currently progresses at a rate of 2.5 m/1000 years, slower than advection of freshwater infiltration because of upward diffusion and dispersion of marine solutes. Notably for landslide hazard, the highest measurements of geotechnical sensitivity coincide with the leached zone.</p>","PeriodicalId":12866,"journal":{"name":"Groundwater","volume":"64 1","pages":"49-63"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12857530/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145961045","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The compaction simulation of compressible delay interbed is an important part of land subsidence simulation. Currently, the most widely used MODFLOW software has two modules, SUB and CSUB, both of which can simulate compressible delay interbed. The difference lies in that the head diffusion equation of the SUB module is based on the principle of head change, while CSUB can use either head change or geological stress variation principles. When based on the principle of geostress variation, the CSUB method is more physically reasonable. However, its limitation lies in the fact that, when solving the diffusion equation for compressible delay interbeds, it does not account for the effects of variations in the discrete nodal cell thickness and hydraulic conductivity of the interbed. This study improves the solution method for the head diffusion equation of compressible delay interbeds based on the principle of geostress variation. The Kozeny–Carman equation was introduced to establish a relationship between the hydraulic conductivity and porosity of the interbeds, while variations in the thickness of discrete nodal cells were also incorporated into the solution process. Collectively, these improvements lead to a more rigorous approach. To verify the effectiveness of the proposed simulation method, three representative test cases were developed and comprehensively compared with the CSUB results. The results indicate that notable discrepancies emerge between the two approaches when the interbed undergoes substantial compression, whereas the method proposed in this study effectively prevents the occurrence of “overcompaction” within the interbed.
{"title":"Simulation Method for Variable Permeability of Delay Interbed Based on Stress Variation Principle","authors":"Shangqi Han, Chuiyu Lu, Wen Lu, Qingyan Sun, Chu Wu","doi":"10.1111/gwat.70039","DOIUrl":"10.1111/gwat.70039","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The compaction simulation of compressible delay interbed is an important part of land subsidence simulation. Currently, the most widely used MODFLOW software has two modules, SUB and CSUB, both of which can simulate compressible delay interbed. The difference lies in that the head diffusion equation of the SUB module is based on the principle of head change, while CSUB can use either head change or geological stress variation principles. When based on the principle of geostress variation, the CSUB method is more physically reasonable. However, its limitation lies in the fact that, when solving the diffusion equation for compressible delay interbeds, it does not account for the effects of variations in the discrete nodal cell thickness and hydraulic conductivity of the interbed. This study improves the solution method for the head diffusion equation of compressible delay interbeds based on the principle of geostress variation. The Kozeny–Carman equation was introduced to establish a relationship between the hydraulic conductivity and porosity of the interbeds, while variations in the thickness of discrete nodal cells were also incorporated into the solution process. Collectively, these improvements lead to a more rigorous approach. To verify the effectiveness of the proposed simulation method, three representative test cases were developed and comprehensively compared with the CSUB results. The results indicate that notable discrepancies emerge between the two approaches when the interbed undergoes substantial compression, whereas the method proposed in this study effectively prevents the occurrence of “overcompaction” within the interbed.</p>","PeriodicalId":12866,"journal":{"name":"Groundwater","volume":"64 1","pages":"90-102"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145901950","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
<p>Low-permeability geologic layers within groundwater systems, commonly referred to as aquitards or confining layers, are important controls of groundwater flow. Aquitards generally restrict groundwater flow and, importantly, can limit contaminant migration to adjacent aquifers. However, they are rarely spatially uniform or isotropic, varying in thickness and lithologic composition. At regional scales, most aquitards contain some type of heterogeneity, such as fractures or erosional windows, that affect groundwater flow and contaminant transport. Many groundwater investigations focus on aquifers, while the physical and chemical characteristics of aquitards, and their role in flow systems, may be over-simplified. Aquitards add complexity to almost all aspects of flow and transport in groundwater systems.</p><p>This <i>Groundwater</i> special issue, Aquitards in Groundwater Systems, has its roots in a recent Geological Society of America conference. A hydrogeology session included a presentation that referenced “aquifers, aquitards and aquitardifers,” which induced giggles from some audience members and affirming head nods from others. The diversity of listener reactions suggested an opportunity to pursue a compilation of topical papers that span the current breadth and depth of aquitard studies.</p><p>In this issue, Runkel and Meyer take on the hydrogeologic lexicon with formal introduction of “aquitardifer.” The term encompasses the anisotropy they document within low-conductivity formations. Such anisotropy can lead to restriction of flow in one direction while providing transmissivity in other directions. This explains production wells that are successfully completed in formations generally characterized as confining units. By explicitly identifying significant anisotropy in low-permeability sedimentary units, Runkel and Meyer advance the field of aquitard science.</p><p>Aquitard science is not consistently integrated within hydrogeologic curriculum, and students may not be prepared to recognize flow systems where aquitards play a significant role. Meyer and others discuss teaching activities (lab exercises and field measurements) that help students develop understanding and intuition of the role aquitards play in flow systems.</p><p>Methods to investigate and characterize aquifer heterogeneity are plentiful in the scientific literature but are not yet fully explored within the realm of aquitards. Van Leer and others model hydraulic response to pumping in an idealized, layered system of aquitards and aquifers. By illustrating key principles in pumping test design, they inform our understanding of drawdown in a heterogeneous aquitard.</p><p>The mechanical properties of aquitards can also present challenges. Hinton and others look at the increasing risk of landslides as the geochemistry of a marine clay aquitard is altered, from the initial mix of glacial and seawater pore fluids, by modern-day recharge. The change in pore fluid reduces the stre
{"title":"Aquitards in Groundwater Systems: Groundwater Special Issue","authors":"Madeline Gotkowitz, David Hart","doi":"10.1111/gwat.70044","DOIUrl":"10.1111/gwat.70044","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Low-permeability geologic layers within groundwater systems, commonly referred to as aquitards or confining layers, are important controls of groundwater flow. Aquitards generally restrict groundwater flow and, importantly, can limit contaminant migration to adjacent aquifers. However, they are rarely spatially uniform or isotropic, varying in thickness and lithologic composition. At regional scales, most aquitards contain some type of heterogeneity, such as fractures or erosional windows, that affect groundwater flow and contaminant transport. Many groundwater investigations focus on aquifers, while the physical and chemical characteristics of aquitards, and their role in flow systems, may be over-simplified. Aquitards add complexity to almost all aspects of flow and transport in groundwater systems.</p><p>This <i>Groundwater</i> special issue, Aquitards in Groundwater Systems, has its roots in a recent Geological Society of America conference. A hydrogeology session included a presentation that referenced “aquifers, aquitards and aquitardifers,” which induced giggles from some audience members and affirming head nods from others. The diversity of listener reactions suggested an opportunity to pursue a compilation of topical papers that span the current breadth and depth of aquitard studies.</p><p>In this issue, Runkel and Meyer take on the hydrogeologic lexicon with formal introduction of “aquitardifer.” The term encompasses the anisotropy they document within low-conductivity formations. Such anisotropy can lead to restriction of flow in one direction while providing transmissivity in other directions. This explains production wells that are successfully completed in formations generally characterized as confining units. By explicitly identifying significant anisotropy in low-permeability sedimentary units, Runkel and Meyer advance the field of aquitard science.</p><p>Aquitard science is not consistently integrated within hydrogeologic curriculum, and students may not be prepared to recognize flow systems where aquitards play a significant role. Meyer and others discuss teaching activities (lab exercises and field measurements) that help students develop understanding and intuition of the role aquitards play in flow systems.</p><p>Methods to investigate and characterize aquifer heterogeneity are plentiful in the scientific literature but are not yet fully explored within the realm of aquitards. Van Leer and others model hydraulic response to pumping in an idealized, layered system of aquitards and aquifers. By illustrating key principles in pumping test design, they inform our understanding of drawdown in a heterogeneous aquitard.</p><p>The mechanical properties of aquitards can also present challenges. Hinton and others look at the increasing risk of landslides as the geochemistry of a marine clay aquitard is altered, from the initial mix of glacial and seawater pore fluids, by modern-day recharge. The change in pore fluid reduces the stre","PeriodicalId":12866,"journal":{"name":"Groundwater","volume":"64 1","pages":"4-5"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ngwa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gwat.70044","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145835544","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Jessica R. Meyer, Stephanie Tassier-Surine, Bradley Cramer
Aquitards play critical roles in a variety of hydrogeologic processes. Despite their importance, coverage of aquitards in introductory hydrogeology textbooks is generally limited. This paper provides examples of classroom and field activities designed with an aquitard focus for instructors wishing to supplement textbook content. These activities emphasize high-resolution head profiles. Examining head profiles prompts students to think about how aquitards influence head with depth and conversely how these plots can be used to delineate and characterize aquitards. During a classroom activity, students explore the connection between changes in vertical gradient and changes in hydraulic conductivity by sketching conceptual head profiles based on given boundary conditions and several aquifer/aquitard scenarios. In a companion field exercise, students measure high-resolution head profiles using CMT multilevel systems at an outdoor learning laboratory. Students compare the high-resolution head profiles to lower resolution profiles they obtain from clusters of conventional wells. The field exercise provides students with a tactile experience that can help build intuition for vertical head changes, practice interpreting aquitards from head profiles, and an example of how lower resolution head profiles may create uncertainty in aquitard delineation and vertical gradient estimates. A paleosol at the site forms a prominent aquitard providing a unique basis for discussions about the geology of aquitards and characteristics influencing aquitard integrity. Regardless of the approach used, incorporating more aquitard content into hydrogeology courses at all levels will be beneficial for future hydrogeologists tackling a range of issues from sustainable water supplies to waste disposal.
{"title":"Teaching Aquitard Concepts With Field-Based High-Resolution Head Profile Learning Activities","authors":"Jessica R. Meyer, Stephanie Tassier-Surine, Bradley Cramer","doi":"10.1111/gwat.70042","DOIUrl":"10.1111/gwat.70042","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Aquitards play critical roles in a variety of hydrogeologic processes. Despite their importance, coverage of aquitards in introductory hydrogeology textbooks is generally limited. This paper provides examples of classroom and field activities designed with an aquitard focus for instructors wishing to supplement textbook content. These activities emphasize high-resolution head profiles. Examining head profiles prompts students to think about how aquitards influence head with depth and conversely how these plots can be used to delineate and characterize aquitards. During a classroom activity, students explore the connection between changes in vertical gradient and changes in hydraulic conductivity by sketching conceptual head profiles based on given boundary conditions and several aquifer/aquitard scenarios. In a companion field exercise, students measure high-resolution head profiles using CMT multilevel systems at an outdoor learning laboratory. Students compare the high-resolution head profiles to lower resolution profiles they obtain from clusters of conventional wells. The field exercise provides students with a tactile experience that can help build intuition for vertical head changes, practice interpreting aquitards from head profiles, and an example of how lower resolution head profiles may create uncertainty in aquitard delineation and vertical gradient estimates. A paleosol at the site forms a prominent aquitard providing a unique basis for discussions about the geology of aquitards and characteristics influencing aquitard integrity. Regardless of the approach used, incorporating more aquitard content into hydrogeology courses at all levels will be beneficial for future hydrogeologists tackling a range of issues from sustainable water supplies to waste disposal.</p>","PeriodicalId":12866,"journal":{"name":"Groundwater","volume":"64 1","pages":"21-29"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12857529/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145764625","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Basic Hydrogeology: An Introduction to the Fundamentals of Groundwater Science","authors":"Rachel Rotz","doi":"10.1111/gwat.70040","DOIUrl":"10.1111/gwat.70040","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12866,"journal":{"name":"Groundwater","volume":"64 1","pages":"7-8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146136182","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Noah R. Heller, Marina Feraud, Chris Bonds, James D. Bohan, Christian Leach, Kimberly A. Miles
Many public supply wells (PSWs) fail because their water chemistry does not meet regulatory standards, despite pilot hole water quality testing suggesting compliance. This is partly attributed to conventional testing that focuses on the mid-section of permeable zones, excluding low-permeability units or aquitards. The main goal is to prove yield, so groundwater is sampled within the tested interval for efficiency. Clay boundaries are typically excluded from zone testing because of low expected yields, but they may harbor elevated concentrations of constituents of concern. Well discharge concentrations may thus be non-compliant due to the blend of groundwater from permeable, high-yield zones and less permeable, elevated concentration zones. We evaluated flow and chemistry across the screens of 143 wells in California and Nevada, identifying the screen intervals with maximum arsenic, iron, manganese, and nitrate concentrations. We examined the relationship between sediment type, flow contribution, and maximum concentrations, focusing on the influence of aquitard boundaries and interbedded sequences on geochemical outcomes. Maximum concentrations occurred mostly (73–84%) in well screens associated with interbedded or coarse sediments with an aquitard boundary. Intervals with aquitard boundaries had higher arsenic concentrations (p = 0.02). In non-compliant wells, 64–69% of the maximum metal concentrations were sourced from fine-grained and interbedded sediments, warranting their inclusion in water quality zone testing. Approaches that may provide the geochemical resolution to determine the distance between aquitard boundaries and well screens are suggested to minimize the risk of constructing non-compliant PSWs that then require treatment.
{"title":"The Essential Role of Aquitard Boundaries in Geochemical Outcomes for Public Supply Wells","authors":"Noah R. Heller, Marina Feraud, Chris Bonds, James D. Bohan, Christian Leach, Kimberly A. Miles","doi":"10.1111/gwat.70035","DOIUrl":"10.1111/gwat.70035","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Many public supply wells (PSWs) fail because their water chemistry does not meet regulatory standards, despite pilot hole water quality testing suggesting compliance. This is partly attributed to conventional testing that focuses on the mid-section of permeable zones, excluding low-permeability units or aquitards. The main goal is to prove yield, so groundwater is sampled within the tested interval for efficiency. Clay boundaries are typically excluded from zone testing because of low expected yields, but they may harbor elevated concentrations of constituents of concern. Well discharge concentrations may thus be non-compliant due to the blend of groundwater from permeable, high-yield zones and less permeable, elevated concentration zones. We evaluated flow and chemistry across the screens of 143 wells in California and Nevada, identifying the screen intervals with maximum arsenic, iron, manganese, and nitrate concentrations. We examined the relationship between sediment type, flow contribution, and maximum concentrations, focusing on the influence of aquitard boundaries and interbedded sequences on geochemical outcomes. Maximum concentrations occurred mostly (73–84%) in well screens associated with interbedded or coarse sediments with an aquitard boundary. Intervals with aquitard boundaries had higher arsenic concentrations (<i>p</i> = 0.02). In non-compliant wells, 64–69% of the maximum metal concentrations were sourced from fine-grained and interbedded sediments, warranting their inclusion in water quality zone testing. Approaches that may provide the geochemical resolution to determine the distance between aquitard boundaries and well screens are suggested to minimize the risk of constructing non-compliant PSWs that then require treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":12866,"journal":{"name":"Groundwater","volume":"64 1","pages":"64-76"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145710710","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The transboundary Hueco Bolson aquifer is the primary water supply for El Paso, Texas, and Ciudad Juárez, Mexico as well as U.S. Army Fort Bliss and smaller cities in Texas and Mexico. Binational groundwater data exchanges between the United States and Mexico that have focused on the aquifer have evolved over more than a century, shaped by scientific, political, and social dynamics. The history can be viewed through distinct periods. Efforts to understand the groundwater resource began with early reconnaissance surveys and have evolved through successive efforts to refine the characterization of groundwater flowpaths, residence times, surface water–groundwater interactions, and aquifer salinization. Lessons from these efforts highlight the importance of perseverance, mutual respect, and formal agreements, such as the 1999 memorandum between El Paso Water Utilities and the Junta Municipal de Agua y Saneamiento de Juárez, in sustaining long-term cooperation. The accumulated datasets chronicle the evolution of hydrogeologic conceptual and mathematical models while providing a foundation for ongoing research, sustainable water-use strategies, and the long-term stewardship of the Hueco Bolson aquifer shared by El Paso and Ciudad Juárez. The Hueco Bolson case demonstrates how long-term, cooperative data collection can improve scientific understanding and management of complex transboundary aquifer systems.
{"title":"History and Results of U.S./Mexico Groundwater Data Exchange Programs in the Paso del Norte Region, 1897 to 2022","authors":"Barry J. Hibbs","doi":"10.1111/gwat.70037","DOIUrl":"10.1111/gwat.70037","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The transboundary Hueco Bolson aquifer is the primary water supply for El Paso, Texas, and Ciudad Juárez, Mexico as well as U.S. Army Fort Bliss and smaller cities in Texas and Mexico. Binational groundwater data exchanges between the United States and Mexico that have focused on the aquifer have evolved over more than a century, shaped by scientific, political, and social dynamics. The history can be viewed through distinct periods. Efforts to understand the groundwater resource began with early reconnaissance surveys and have evolved through successive efforts to refine the characterization of groundwater flowpaths, residence times, surface water–groundwater interactions, and aquifer salinization. Lessons from these efforts highlight the importance of perseverance, mutual respect, and formal agreements, such as the 1999 memorandum between El Paso Water Utilities and the Junta Municipal de Agua y Saneamiento de Juárez, in sustaining long-term cooperation. The accumulated datasets chronicle the evolution of hydrogeologic conceptual and mathematical models while providing a foundation for ongoing research, sustainable water-use strategies, and the long-term stewardship of the Hueco Bolson aquifer shared by El Paso and Ciudad Juárez. The Hueco Bolson case demonstrates how long-term, cooperative data collection can improve scientific understanding and management of complex transboundary aquifer systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":12866,"journal":{"name":"Groundwater","volume":"64 1","pages":"103-124"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145673334","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}