Radiologically inserted gastrostomy tube in neurological disease: A retrospective study.

IF 1.1 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Journal of Clinical Imaging Science Pub Date : 2023-10-30 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.25259/JCIS_78_2023
Brittany Marie Zaita, Abheek Ghosh, Sean Lee, Aislynn Raymond, Tanvir Agnihotri, Nabeel M Akhter
{"title":"Radiologically inserted gastrostomy tube in neurological disease: A retrospective study.","authors":"Brittany Marie Zaita, Abheek Ghosh, Sean Lee, Aislynn Raymond, Tanvir Agnihotri, Nabeel M Akhter","doi":"10.25259/JCIS_78_2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of balloon and non-balloon (or dilator) gastrostomy devices in radiologically inserted gastrostomy (RIG) for patients with neurological disease.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of 152 patients was conducted at a tertiary care hospital from July 2017 to September 2020. 104 and 48 patients were included in the balloon and non-balloon groups, respectively. The frequency of complications per specific neurological indication as well as the breakdown of the different complications pertaining to each indication was recorded for analysis. The recovery time, fluoroscopy time, contrast volume, peak radiation, and pain management dosages for each procedure were all reviewed to evaluate for statistical differences between the balloon and non-balloon groups. An adjusted model odds ratio (OR) was conducted to evaluate how each of the variables (type of gastrostomy tube, body mass index [BMI], age, and gender) affected the frequency of complications within our cohort.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 152 patients, with an average age of 65.17 years (interquartile range [IQR] = 12.66) and an average BMI of 26.97 (IQR = 7.19). The majority of patients were male (71.1%). The most common indication for the procedure was stroke (24.3%), followed by post-intubation dysphagia (16.4%) and intracranial hemorrhage (11.8%). Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and altered mental status had a similar prevalence at 9.9%. The overall complication rate was 33.8%, overall mortality rate 3.3%, 30-day mortality rate of 2.6%, and no other major complications according to CIRSE criteria. Notably, patients with neurodegenerative disorders exhibited comparable rates of minor complications: 33.3% in ALS (5/15 patients), 50% in myasthenia gravis (1/2 patients), and 100% in muscular dystrophy (1/1 patient). The study compared two groups: the balloon group (104 patients) and the dilator group (48 patients). The balloon group received significantly lower preoperative sedation in the form of fentanyl (Avg = 4.46 min vs. 6.54 min, <i>P</i> = 0.287). The balloon group had shorter fluoroscopy time, lower radiation exposure dose, and shorter operating time compared to the dilator group, though not statistically significant. In the logistic regression model, there was no statistical difference in complication rates between the dilator and balloon groups. BMI, age, and gender did not significantly affect minor complication rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RIG tube insertions may serve as a valuable, alternative approach in providing enteral support in patients with neurological disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":15512,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Imaging Science","volume":"13 ","pages":"35"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10629245/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Imaging Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/JCIS_78_2023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of balloon and non-balloon (or dilator) gastrostomy devices in radiologically inserted gastrostomy (RIG) for patients with neurological disease.

Material and methods: A retrospective analysis of 152 patients was conducted at a tertiary care hospital from July 2017 to September 2020. 104 and 48 patients were included in the balloon and non-balloon groups, respectively. The frequency of complications per specific neurological indication as well as the breakdown of the different complications pertaining to each indication was recorded for analysis. The recovery time, fluoroscopy time, contrast volume, peak radiation, and pain management dosages for each procedure were all reviewed to evaluate for statistical differences between the balloon and non-balloon groups. An adjusted model odds ratio (OR) was conducted to evaluate how each of the variables (type of gastrostomy tube, body mass index [BMI], age, and gender) affected the frequency of complications within our cohort.

Results: This study included 152 patients, with an average age of 65.17 years (interquartile range [IQR] = 12.66) and an average BMI of 26.97 (IQR = 7.19). The majority of patients were male (71.1%). The most common indication for the procedure was stroke (24.3%), followed by post-intubation dysphagia (16.4%) and intracranial hemorrhage (11.8%). Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and altered mental status had a similar prevalence at 9.9%. The overall complication rate was 33.8%, overall mortality rate 3.3%, 30-day mortality rate of 2.6%, and no other major complications according to CIRSE criteria. Notably, patients with neurodegenerative disorders exhibited comparable rates of minor complications: 33.3% in ALS (5/15 patients), 50% in myasthenia gravis (1/2 patients), and 100% in muscular dystrophy (1/1 patient). The study compared two groups: the balloon group (104 patients) and the dilator group (48 patients). The balloon group received significantly lower preoperative sedation in the form of fentanyl (Avg = 4.46 min vs. 6.54 min, P = 0.287). The balloon group had shorter fluoroscopy time, lower radiation exposure dose, and shorter operating time compared to the dilator group, though not statistically significant. In the logistic regression model, there was no statistical difference in complication rates between the dilator and balloon groups. BMI, age, and gender did not significantly affect minor complication rates.

Conclusion: RIG tube insertions may serve as a valuable, alternative approach in providing enteral support in patients with neurological disease.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
放射插入胃造瘘管治疗神经系统疾病:一项回顾性研究。
目的:本研究旨在比较球囊和非球囊(或扩张器)胃造瘘装置在神经系统疾病患者放射插入胃造瘘(RIG)中的安全性和有效性。材料和方法:2017年7月至2020年9月,在一家三级护理医院对152名患者进行了回顾性分析。球囊组和非球囊组分别包括104名和48名患者。记录每个特定神经适应症的并发症频率以及与每个适应症相关的不同并发症的分类,以进行分析。对每次手术的恢复时间、荧光透视时间、造影剂体积、峰值辐射和疼痛管理剂量进行了回顾,以评估球囊组和非球囊组之间的统计学差异。进行调整后的模型优势比(OR),以评估每个变量(胃造口管类型、体重指数[BMI]、年龄和性别)如何影响我们队列中并发症的频率。结果:本研究包括152名患者,平均年龄65.17岁(四分位间距[IQR]=12.66),平均BMI 26.97(IQR=7.19)。大多数患者为男性(71.1%)。最常见的手术指征是中风(24.3%),其次是插管后吞咽困难(16.4%)和颅内出血(11.8%)。肌萎缩侧索硬化症(ALS)和精神状态改变的患病率相似,为9.9%。根据CIRSE标准,总并发症发生率为33.8%,总死亡率为3.3%,30天死亡率为2.6%,无其他主要并发症。值得注意的是,神经退行性疾病患者的轻微并发症发生率相当:ALS患者为33.3%(5/15例),重症肌无力患者为50%(1/2例),肌营养不良患者为100%(1/1例)。该研究比较了两组:球囊组(104名患者)和扩张器组(48名患者)。球囊组以芬太尼形式接受的术前镇静显著降低(Avg=4.46分钟vs.6.54分钟,P=0.287)。与扩张器组相比,球囊组荧光透视时间更短,辐射暴露剂量更低,手术时间更短,但无统计学意义。在逻辑回归模型中,扩张器组和球囊组的并发症发生率没有统计学差异。BMI、年龄和性别对轻微并发症发生率没有显著影响。结论:RIG管插入术可作为神经系统疾病患者提供肠内支持的一种有价值的替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Imaging Science
Journal of Clinical Imaging Science RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Imaging Science (JCIS) is an open access peer-reviewed journal committed to publishing high-quality articles in the field of Imaging Science. The journal aims to present Imaging Science and relevant clinical information in an understandable and useful format. The journal is owned and published by the Scientific Scholar. Audience Our audience includes Radiologists, Researchers, Clinicians, medical professionals and students. Review process JCIS has a highly rigorous peer-review process that makes sure that manuscripts are scientifically accurate, relevant, novel and important. Authors disclose all conflicts, affiliations and financial associations such that the published content is not biased.
期刊最新文献
Three main portal veins: A very rare case of portal vein anomaly. Granulomatous prostatitis following Bacillus Calmette-Guérin therapy. Granulomatous mastitis following stereotactic core-needle biopsy: A case report. Multimodal imaging findings of tubulocystic renal cell carcinoma: A case report. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging findings of intracranial and extracranial meningioma with perineural spread through the foramen rotundum: A case report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1