The Prognostic Value of Preoperative Naples Prognostic Score in Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Patients after Radical Nephroureterectomy.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Nutrition and Cancer-An International Journal Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-27 DOI:10.1080/01635581.2023.2279218
Jianjun Ye, Zeyu Chen, Yulong Pan, Xinyang Liao, Xingyuan Wang, Chichen Zhang, Qihao Wang, Ping Han, Qiang Wei, Yige Bao
{"title":"The Prognostic Value of Preoperative Naples Prognostic Score in Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Patients after Radical Nephroureterectomy.","authors":"Jianjun Ye, Zeyu Chen, Yulong Pan, Xinyang Liao, Xingyuan Wang, Chichen Zhang, Qihao Wang, Ping Han, Qiang Wei, Yige Bao","doi":"10.1080/01635581.2023.2279218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aims to determine the prognostic value of preoperative Naples prognostic score (NPS) on survival outcomes in upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) patients after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). We conducted a retrospective study about UTUC patients at West China Hospital from January 2015 to June 2019. The X-Tile program was used to identify the optimal cutoff value of NPS. Overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were the endpoints of interest. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to estimate survival and Cox proportional hazard model was used for risk assessment. A total of 237 UTUC patients after RNU were identified and the threshold of NPS was determined to be 2. Preoperative high-NPS was associated with inferior OS (<i>p</i> = 0.004), CSS (<i>p</i> = 0.002) and PFS (<i>p</i> = 0.008), especially in locally advanced UTUC patients. Preoperative NPS was an independent predictor for OS (HR: 1.78; 95% CI: 1.08, 2.93), CSS (HR: 1.87; 95% CI: 1.11, 3.14) and PFS (HR: 1.60; 95% CI: 1.02, 2.50). The addition of NPS into the predictive model consisting of predictors from multivariate Cox regression resulted in better prediction performance. Preoperative NPS was a novel and reliable predictor for survival in UTUC patients after RNU, and should be further explored.</p>","PeriodicalId":54701,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition and Cancer-An International Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition and Cancer-An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01635581.2023.2279218","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to determine the prognostic value of preoperative Naples prognostic score (NPS) on survival outcomes in upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) patients after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). We conducted a retrospective study about UTUC patients at West China Hospital from January 2015 to June 2019. The X-Tile program was used to identify the optimal cutoff value of NPS. Overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were the endpoints of interest. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to estimate survival and Cox proportional hazard model was used for risk assessment. A total of 237 UTUC patients after RNU were identified and the threshold of NPS was determined to be 2. Preoperative high-NPS was associated with inferior OS (p = 0.004), CSS (p = 0.002) and PFS (p = 0.008), especially in locally advanced UTUC patients. Preoperative NPS was an independent predictor for OS (HR: 1.78; 95% CI: 1.08, 2.93), CSS (HR: 1.87; 95% CI: 1.11, 3.14) and PFS (HR: 1.60; 95% CI: 1.02, 2.50). The addition of NPS into the predictive model consisting of predictors from multivariate Cox regression resulted in better prediction performance. Preoperative NPS was a novel and reliable predictor for survival in UTUC patients after RNU, and should be further explored.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Naples预后评分对上尿路上皮癌根治性肾输尿管切除术后患者的预后价值。
本研究旨在确定术前Naples预后评分(NPS)对上尿路上皮癌(UTUC)患者根治性肾输尿管切除术(RNU)后生存结果的预后价值。我们对2015年1月至2019年6月在华西医院就诊的UTUC患者进行了回顾性研究。X-Tile程序用于确定NPS的最佳截止值。总生存率(OS)、癌症特异性生存率(CSS)和无进展生存率(PFS)是感兴趣的终点。Kaplan-Meier曲线用于估计生存率,Cox比例风险模型用于风险评估。共有237名RNU后的UTUC患者被确定,NPS阈值被确定为2。术前高NPS与下OS相关(p = 0.004),CSS(p = 0.002)和PFS(p = 0.008),尤其是在局部晚期UTUC患者中。术前NPS是OS(HR:1.78;95%CI:1.082.93)、CSS(HR:1.87;95%CI:1.113.14)和PFS(HR:1.60;95%CI:1.022.50)的独立预测因子。在由多变量Cox回归预测因子组成的预测模型中添加NPS可获得更好的预测性能。术前NPS是一种新的、可靠的预测RNU后UTUC患者生存率的指标,值得进一步探索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
3.40%
发文量
172
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: This timely publication reports and reviews current findings on the effects of nutrition on the etiology, therapy, and prevention of cancer. Etiological issues include clinical and experimental research in nutrition, carcinogenesis, epidemiology, biochemistry, and molecular biology. Coverage of therapy focuses on research in clinical nutrition and oncology, dietetics, and bioengineering. Prevention approaches include public health recommendations, preventative medicine, behavior modification, education, functional foods, and agricultural and food production policies.
期刊最新文献
Puerarin Ameliorates Ferroptosis in Neuronal Injury Through the PI3K/AKT Signaling Pathway. Body Composition Decrease and Impact on Clinical Outcome in Gastric Cancer Patients Undergoing Radical Gastrectomy After Neoadjuvant Treatment. Associations Between Obesity and Risk of Thyroid Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies. Dietary Flavonoids and Lung Cancer: A GRADE-Assessed Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies. Activation of the WNT7B/β-Catenin Pathway Initiates GLUT1 Expression and Promotes Aerobic Glycolysis in Colorectal Cancer Cells.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1