Evaluation of an Unloading Concept for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Pilot Study in a Small Patient Group.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 BIOPHYSICS Journal of Biomechanical Engineering-Transactions of the Asme Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1115/1.4064031
Jonas S Stoltze, Anderson S C Oliveira, John Rasmussen, Michael S Andersen
{"title":"Evaluation of an Unloading Concept for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Pilot Study in a Small Patient Group.","authors":"Jonas S Stoltze, Anderson S C Oliveira, John Rasmussen, Michael S Andersen","doi":"10.1115/1.4064031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Joint compressive forces have been identified as a risk factor for osteoarthritis disease progression. Therefore, unloader braces are a common treatment with the aim of relieving pain, but their effects are not clearly documented in the literature. A knee brace concept was tested with the aim of reducing joint loads and pain in knee osteoarthritis patients by applying an extension moment exclusively during the stance phase. The ideal effects were evaluated during gait based on musculoskeletal modeling of six patients, and experimental tests with a prototype brace were conducted on one patient. The effects were evaluated using electromyography measurements and musculoskeletal models to evaluate the muscle activation and knee compressive forces, respectively. The ideal brace simulations revealed a varying reduction of the first peak knee force between 3.5% and 33.8% across six patients whereas the second peak was unaffected. The prototype reduced the peak vasti muscle activation with 7.9% and musculoskeletal models showed a reduction of the first peak knee compressive force of up to 26.3%. However, the prototype brace increased the knee joint force impulse of up to 17.1% and no immediate pain reduction was observed. The reduction of the first peak knee compressive force, using a prototype on a single patient, indicates a promising effect from an applied knee extension moment for reducing knee joint loads during normal gait. However, further clinical experiments with this brace method are required to evaluate the long-term effects on both pain and disease progression in knee osteoarthritis patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":54871,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biomechanical Engineering-Transactions of the Asme","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biomechanical Engineering-Transactions of the Asme","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4064031","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Joint compressive forces have been identified as a risk factor for osteoarthritis disease progression. Therefore, unloader braces are a common treatment with the aim of relieving pain, but their effects are not clearly documented in the literature. A knee brace concept was tested with the aim of reducing joint loads and pain in knee osteoarthritis patients by applying an extension moment exclusively during the stance phase. The ideal effects were evaluated during gait based on musculoskeletal modeling of six patients, and experimental tests with a prototype brace were conducted on one patient. The effects were evaluated using electromyography measurements and musculoskeletal models to evaluate the muscle activation and knee compressive forces, respectively. The ideal brace simulations revealed a varying reduction of the first peak knee force between 3.5% and 33.8% across six patients whereas the second peak was unaffected. The prototype reduced the peak vasti muscle activation with 7.9% and musculoskeletal models showed a reduction of the first peak knee compressive force of up to 26.3%. However, the prototype brace increased the knee joint force impulse of up to 17.1% and no immediate pain reduction was observed. The reduction of the first peak knee compressive force, using a prototype on a single patient, indicates a promising effect from an applied knee extension moment for reducing knee joint loads during normal gait. However, further clinical experiments with this brace method are required to evaluate the long-term effects on both pain and disease progression in knee osteoarthritis patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
膝骨关节炎卸载概念的评估:一项小患者组的初步研究。
背景:关节压力已被确定为骨关节炎疾病进展的危险因素。因此,减压器支架是一种常见的治疗方法,目的是减轻疼痛,但其效果在文献中没有明确记载。方法:测试膝关节支架的概念,目的是通过仅在站立阶段施加伸展力矩来减轻膝骨关节炎患者的关节负荷和疼痛。基于六名患者的肌肉骨骼模型,在步态过程中评估了理想效果,并对一名患者进行了原型支架的实验测试。使用肌电图测量和肌肉骨骼模型分别评估肌肉激活和膝关节压缩力来评估效果。研究结果:理想的支架模拟显示,六名患者的第一个峰值膝盖力降低了4%至34%,而第二个峰值没有受到影响。该原型将股骨头肌肉的峰值激活降低了8%,肌肉骨骼模型显示第一个峰值膝盖压缩力降低了26%。然而,原型支架将膝关节力脉冲增加了17%,并且没有观察到疼痛立即减轻。解释:在单个患者身上使用原型,第一个峰值膝盖压缩力的减少表明,在正常步态中,施加的膝盖伸展力矩对减少膝关节负荷有很好的效果。然而,需要用这种支架方法进行进一步的临床实验,以评估对膝骨关节炎患者疼痛和疾病进展的长期影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
169
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Artificial Organs and Prostheses; Bioinstrumentation and Measurements; Bioheat Transfer; Biomaterials; Biomechanics; Bioprocess Engineering; Cellular Mechanics; Design and Control of Biological Systems; Physiological Systems.
期刊最新文献
Image-Based Estimation of Left Ventricular Myocardial Stiffness. Phenomenological Muscle Constitutive Model With Actin-Titin Binding for Simulating Active Stretching. Regulatory Role of Collagen XI in the Establishment of Mechanical Properties of Tendons and Ligaments in Mice Is Tissue Dependent. Study of the Mechanism of Perceived Rotational Acceleration of a Bionic Semicircular Canal on the Basis of the "Circular Geometry Hypothesis". Walking Slope and Heavy Backpacks Affect Peak and Impulsive Lumbar Joint Contact Forces.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1