Lateral control for autonomous vehicles: A comparative evaluation

IF 7.3 2区 计算机科学 Q1 AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS Annual Reviews in Control Pub Date : 2023-11-03 DOI:10.1016/j.arcontrol.2023.100910
Antonio Artuñedo, Marcos Moreno-Gonzalez, Jorge Villagra
{"title":"Lateral control for autonomous vehicles: A comparative evaluation","authors":"Antonio Artuñedo,&nbsp;Marcos Moreno-Gonzalez,&nbsp;Jorge Villagra","doi":"10.1016/j.arcontrol.2023.100910","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The selection of an appropriate control strategy is essential for ensuring safe operation in autonomous driving. While numerous control strategies have been developed for specific driving scenarios, a comprehensive comparative assessment of their performance using the same tuning methodology is lacking in the literature. This paper addresses this gap by presenting a systematic evaluation of state-of-the-art model-free and model-based control strategies. The objective is to evaluate and contrast the performance of these controllers across a wide range of driving scenarios, reflecting the diverse needs of autonomous vehicles. To facilitate the comparative analysis, a comprehensive set of performance metrics is selected, encompassing accuracy, robustness, and comfort. The contributions of this research include the design of a systematic tuning methodology, the use of two novel metrics for stability and comfort comparisons and the evaluation through extensive simulations and real tests in an experimental instrumented vehicle over a wide range of trajectories.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50750,"journal":{"name":"Annual Reviews in Control","volume":"57 ","pages":"Article 100910"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual Reviews in Control","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1367578823000743","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The selection of an appropriate control strategy is essential for ensuring safe operation in autonomous driving. While numerous control strategies have been developed for specific driving scenarios, a comprehensive comparative assessment of their performance using the same tuning methodology is lacking in the literature. This paper addresses this gap by presenting a systematic evaluation of state-of-the-art model-free and model-based control strategies. The objective is to evaluate and contrast the performance of these controllers across a wide range of driving scenarios, reflecting the diverse needs of autonomous vehicles. To facilitate the comparative analysis, a comprehensive set of performance metrics is selected, encompassing accuracy, robustness, and comfort. The contributions of this research include the design of a systematic tuning methodology, the use of two novel metrics for stability and comfort comparisons and the evaluation through extensive simulations and real tests in an experimental instrumented vehicle over a wide range of trajectories.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自动驾驶汽车横向控制:比较评价
选择合适的控制策略对于确保自动驾驶的安全运行至关重要。虽然已经为特定的驾驶场景开发了许多控制策略,但文献中缺乏使用相同调整方法对其性能进行全面的比较评估。本文通过对最先进的无模型和基于模型的控制策略进行系统评估来解决这一差距。目标是评估和对比这些控制器在各种驾驶场景中的性能,反映自动驾驶汽车的不同需求。为了便于比较分析,选择了一套全面的性能指标,包括准确性、稳健性和舒适性。这项研究的贡献包括设计一种系统的调整方法,使用两种新的指标进行稳定性和舒适性比较,以及通过在实验仪器车辆中进行广泛的模拟和实际测试来评估各种轨迹。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annual Reviews in Control
Annual Reviews in Control 工程技术-自动化与控制系统
CiteScore
19.00
自引率
2.10%
发文量
53
审稿时长
36 days
期刊介绍: The field of Control is changing very fast now with technology-driven “societal grand challenges” and with the deployment of new digital technologies. The aim of Annual Reviews in Control is to provide comprehensive and visionary views of the field of Control, by publishing the following types of review articles: Survey Article: Review papers on main methodologies or technical advances adding considerable technical value to the state of the art. Note that papers which purely rely on mechanistic searches and lack comprehensive analysis providing a clear contribution to the field will be rejected. Vision Article: Cutting-edge and emerging topics with visionary perspective on the future of the field or how it will bridge multiple disciplines, and Tutorial research Article: Fundamental guides for future studies.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Analysis and design of model predictive control frameworks for dynamic operation—An overview Advances in controller design of pacemakers for pacing control: A comprehensive review Recent advances in path integral control for trajectory optimization: An overview in theoretical and algorithmic perspectives Analyzing stability in 2D systems via LMIs: From pioneering to recent contributions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1