Standardized ultrasound as a new method to induce platelet aggregation

Carsten Otto , Martin Baumann , Thomas Schreiner , Guido Bartsch , Helmut Borberg , Peter Schwandt , Holger Schmid-Schönbein
{"title":"Standardized ultrasound as a new method to induce platelet aggregation","authors":"Carsten Otto ,&nbsp;Martin Baumann ,&nbsp;Thomas Schreiner ,&nbsp;Guido Bartsch ,&nbsp;Helmut Borberg ,&nbsp;Peter Schwandt ,&nbsp;Holger Schmid-Schönbein","doi":"10.1016/S0929-8266(01)00157-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Most of the published studies concerning platelet aggregation were performed with chemical stimulation procedures, however, mechanical stimulation might be a better simulation of physiological activation of platelets. In order to evaluate the influence of ultrasound on platelet aggregation in vitro, we developed an ultrasound device in a standardized set-up, and we evaluated the influence of lipoproteins and the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor tirofiban on ultrasound induced platelet aggregation. A cylindrical shaped plastic test tube with 1 ml of platelet-rich plasma was placed in an ultrasound bath (35kHz) for 5 s. The ultrasound energy transfer into the sample (Δ</span><em>W</em>=3.77 J) was calculated using the average temperature increase (averaged by 0.935<!--> <span><span>°C) of the sample. Platelet aggregation was quantified immediately after stimulation with ultrasound or adenosine </span>diphosphate (ADP 2.1 and 4.2 μM) by the Myrenne Aggregometer PA2 at low (40 s</span><sup>−1</sup>) and afterwards at high (2500 s<sup>−1</sup>) shear. To evaluate the influence of lipoproteins, seven healthy male volunteers were investigated before and after a fat load (50 g fat per m<sup>2</sup> body surface), and 11 patients suffering from hypercholesterolemia and atherosclerotic disease before and after a single low-density lipoprotein (LDL) apheresis. Platelet aggregation after ultrasound stimulation was well correlated with platelet aggregation after ADP (<em>r</em> between 0.50 and 0.95). However, when exposed to high shear, the low shear-induced platelet aggregates were more stable after ultrasound stimulation compared with ADP stimulation either with or without tirofiban. After the fat load triglyceride concentration increased from 0.86±0.39 to 2.10±1.10 mmol l<sup>−1</sup> (<em>P</em>&lt;0.05) resulting in a reduced formation of platelet aggregates after weak (ADP 2.1 μM) but not after strong (ADP 4.2 μM or ultrasound) stimuli. After a single LDL apheresis LDL cholesterol dropped from 3.99±0.90 to 1.06±0.55 mmol l<sup>−1</sup> (<em>P</em>&lt;0.005). No changes in platelet aggregation were observed with the exception of a lower aggregation when exposed to high shear after stimulation with 2.1 μM ADP. In conclusion, we found the ultrasound stimulation of platelet-rich plasma easy to perform. The platelet aggregation after ultrasound stimulation correlated well with stimulation after ADP. While a reduction in LDL cholesterol concentration had only slight effects on platelet aggregation, an increase in triglyceride concentration resulted in a reduced formation of platelet aggregates after weak stimulation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":79592,"journal":{"name":"European journal of ultrasound : official journal of the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology","volume":"14 2","pages":"Pages 157-166"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0929-8266(01)00157-4","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of ultrasound : official journal of the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0929826601001574","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Most of the published studies concerning platelet aggregation were performed with chemical stimulation procedures, however, mechanical stimulation might be a better simulation of physiological activation of platelets. In order to evaluate the influence of ultrasound on platelet aggregation in vitro, we developed an ultrasound device in a standardized set-up, and we evaluated the influence of lipoproteins and the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor tirofiban on ultrasound induced platelet aggregation. A cylindrical shaped plastic test tube with 1 ml of platelet-rich plasma was placed in an ultrasound bath (35kHz) for 5 s. The ultrasound energy transfer into the sample (ΔW=3.77 J) was calculated using the average temperature increase (averaged by 0.935 °C) of the sample. Platelet aggregation was quantified immediately after stimulation with ultrasound or adenosine diphosphate (ADP 2.1 and 4.2 μM) by the Myrenne Aggregometer PA2 at low (40 s−1) and afterwards at high (2500 s−1) shear. To evaluate the influence of lipoproteins, seven healthy male volunteers were investigated before and after a fat load (50 g fat per m2 body surface), and 11 patients suffering from hypercholesterolemia and atherosclerotic disease before and after a single low-density lipoprotein (LDL) apheresis. Platelet aggregation after ultrasound stimulation was well correlated with platelet aggregation after ADP (r between 0.50 and 0.95). However, when exposed to high shear, the low shear-induced platelet aggregates were more stable after ultrasound stimulation compared with ADP stimulation either with or without tirofiban. After the fat load triglyceride concentration increased from 0.86±0.39 to 2.10±1.10 mmol l−1 (P<0.05) resulting in a reduced formation of platelet aggregates after weak (ADP 2.1 μM) but not after strong (ADP 4.2 μM or ultrasound) stimuli. After a single LDL apheresis LDL cholesterol dropped from 3.99±0.90 to 1.06±0.55 mmol l−1 (P<0.005). No changes in platelet aggregation were observed with the exception of a lower aggregation when exposed to high shear after stimulation with 2.1 μM ADP. In conclusion, we found the ultrasound stimulation of platelet-rich plasma easy to perform. The platelet aggregation after ultrasound stimulation correlated well with stimulation after ADP. While a reduction in LDL cholesterol concentration had only slight effects on platelet aggregation, an increase in triglyceride concentration resulted in a reduced formation of platelet aggregates after weak stimulation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
标准化超声作为诱导血小板聚集的新方法
大多数已发表的关于血小板聚集的研究都是通过化学刺激程序进行的,然而,机械刺激可能是更好地模拟血小板生理激活的方法。为了评估超声对体外血小板聚集的影响,我们在标准化装置中开发了一种超声设备,并评估了脂蛋白和糖蛋白IIb/IIIa抑制剂替罗非班对超声诱导的血小板聚集的作用。将装有1 ml富含血小板血浆的圆柱形塑料试管置于超声浴(35kHz)中5 s。使用样品的平均温度升高(平均0.935°C)计算进入样品的超声能量转移(ΔW=3.77 J)。在超声或二磷酸腺苷(ADP 2.1和4.2μM)刺激后,立即用Myrenne Aggregometer PA2在低剪切(40 s-1)和高剪切(2500 s-1)下定量血小板聚集。为了评估脂蛋白的影响,对7名健康男性志愿者在脂肪负荷(每平方米体表50克脂肪)前后以及11名患有高胆固醇血症和动脉粥样硬化疾病的患者在单次低密度脂蛋白(LDL)单采前后进行了调查。超声刺激后的血小板聚集与ADP后的血小板聚合密切相关(r在0.50和0.95之间)。然而,当暴露于高剪切时,与有或没有替罗非班的ADP刺激相比,超声刺激后低剪切诱导的血小板聚集更稳定。脂肪负荷后,甘油三酯浓度从0.86±0.39增加到2.10±1.10 mmol l−1(P<;0.05),导致弱(ADP 2.1μM)刺激后血小板聚集体的形成减少,而强(ADP 4.2μM或超声)刺激后则没有。单次LDL单采后,LDL胆固醇从3.99±0.90降至1.06±0.55 mmol l−1(P<;0.005)。除2.1μM ADP刺激后暴露于高剪切时血小板聚集较低外,未观察到血小板聚集变化。总之,我们发现富含血小板的血浆的超声刺激很容易执行。超声刺激后的血小板聚集与ADP后的刺激密切相关。虽然低密度脂蛋白胆固醇浓度的降低对血小板聚集只有轻微影响,但甘油三酯浓度的增加导致弱刺激后血小板聚集的形成减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Ultrasound assessment of the intima and media layers on the carotid arteries in peri- and postmenopausal women Subject Index Author Index Control system analysis of visually evoked blood flow regulation in humans under normocapnia and hypercapnia Effect of hypertension and candesartan on the blood flow velocity of the extraocular vessels in hypertensive patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1