Immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) in current systemic therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)

F. van Bömmel , T. Berg , F. Lordick
{"title":"Immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) in current systemic therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)","authors":"F. van Bömmel ,&nbsp;T. Berg ,&nbsp;F. Lordick","doi":"10.1016/j.esmogo.2023.08.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) has revolutionized cancer therapy, including treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) which comprises 80%-90% of all liver cancers, the third most common cause of cancer-related death worldwide. The main targeted pathways are the cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein-4 (CTLA-4) and the programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) checkpoints. Blockade of CTLA-4 with monoclonal antibodies leads to an activation and increase in effector T cells that can interact with tumor cells. Additionally, inhibitory regulatory T cells are reduced, leading to an immunosupportive tumor microenvironment. PD-1/PD-L1 inhibition reduces immunosuppression directly within the tumor tissue and reactivates the immune response to tumor cells. Recently, the HIMALAYA trial has shown that dual ICI with the CTLA-4-blocking antibody tremelimumab and the PD-L1-directed antibody durvalumab (STRIDE regimen) is superior to sorafenib regarding efficacy and safety in advanced HCC and has shown unprecedented long-term survival data for these patients. The combination of PD-L1-directed ICI (atezolizumab) and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (bevacizumab) significantly improved outcomes compared to sorafenib and has been in clinical use since 2020. Looking at outcome measures for ICI, radiologically assessed endpoints such as progression-free survival and objective response rate only modestly correlate with overall survival. The modified RECIST criteria seem to better identify ICI responders in HCC compared to conventional imaging evaluation criteria. So far, predictive biomarkers in HCC and a robust understanding of the impact of underlying liver diseases are largely lacking. An accurate stratification of patients based on biomarkers and etiology has the potential to further improve outcomes in HCC.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100490,"journal":{"name":"ESMO Gastrointestinal Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ESMO Gastrointestinal Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949819823000055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) has revolutionized cancer therapy, including treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) which comprises 80%-90% of all liver cancers, the third most common cause of cancer-related death worldwide. The main targeted pathways are the cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein-4 (CTLA-4) and the programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) checkpoints. Blockade of CTLA-4 with monoclonal antibodies leads to an activation and increase in effector T cells that can interact with tumor cells. Additionally, inhibitory regulatory T cells are reduced, leading to an immunosupportive tumor microenvironment. PD-1/PD-L1 inhibition reduces immunosuppression directly within the tumor tissue and reactivates the immune response to tumor cells. Recently, the HIMALAYA trial has shown that dual ICI with the CTLA-4-blocking antibody tremelimumab and the PD-L1-directed antibody durvalumab (STRIDE regimen) is superior to sorafenib regarding efficacy and safety in advanced HCC and has shown unprecedented long-term survival data for these patients. The combination of PD-L1-directed ICI (atezolizumab) and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (bevacizumab) significantly improved outcomes compared to sorafenib and has been in clinical use since 2020. Looking at outcome measures for ICI, radiologically assessed endpoints such as progression-free survival and objective response rate only modestly correlate with overall survival. The modified RECIST criteria seem to better identify ICI responders in HCC compared to conventional imaging evaluation criteria. So far, predictive biomarkers in HCC and a robust understanding of the impact of underlying liver diseases are largely lacking. An accurate stratification of patients based on biomarkers and etiology has the potential to further improve outcomes in HCC.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
免疫检查点抑制(ICI)在当前肝细胞癌(HCC)全身治疗中的应用
免疫检查点抑制(ICI)彻底改变了癌症治疗,包括肝细胞癌(HCC)的治疗,HCC占所有肝癌的80%-90%,是全球第三大癌症相关死亡原因。主要靶向途径是细胞毒性T淋巴细胞相关蛋白-4(CTLA-4)和程序性细胞死亡蛋白1(PD-1)/程序性死亡配体1(PD-L1)检查点。用单克隆抗体阻断CTLA-4导致可以与肿瘤细胞相互作用的效应T细胞的激活和增加。此外,抑制性调节性T细胞减少,导致免疫支持性肿瘤微环境。PD-1/PD-L1抑制直接减少肿瘤组织内的免疫抑制,并重新激活对肿瘤细胞的免疫反应。最近,HIMALAYA试验表明,在治疗晚期HCC的疗效和安全性方面,具有CTLA-4-阻断抗体tremelimumab和PD-L1导向抗体durvalumab的双重ICI(STRIDE方案)优于索拉非尼,并显示出这些患者前所未有的长期生存数据。与索拉非尼相比,PD-L1导向ICI(atezolizumab)和抗血管内皮生长因子(贝伐单抗)的组合显著改善了疗效,自2020年以来一直在临床使用。从ICI的结果测量来看,放射学评估的终点,如无进展生存率和客观有效率,与总生存率仅适度相关。与传统的影像学评估标准相比,改良的RECIST标准似乎能更好地识别HCC中的ICI应答者。到目前为止,HCC的预测性生物标志物和对潜在肝病影响的深入了解在很大程度上都缺乏。基于生物标志物和病因对患者进行准确的分层有可能进一步改善HCC的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Gastric cancer hospital-based registry: real-world gastric cancer data from Latin America and Europe Geriatric Assessment-guided therapy modification and outcomes in patients with non-metastatic gastroesophageal cancer: a retrospective cohort study☆ Table of Contents Editorial Board PRABITAS study design: a pragmatic, randomized phase III trial of bi-weekly versus conventional trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab for metastatic colorectal cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1