Which Doppler velocity is best for assessing suitability for carotid endarterectomy?

Stephanie C. Lewis, Joanna M. Wardlaw
{"title":"Which Doppler velocity is best for assessing suitability for carotid endarterectomy?","authors":"Stephanie C. Lewis,&nbsp;Joanna M. Wardlaw","doi":"10.1016/S0929-8266(01)00168-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><em>Objective:</em> To evaluate which velocity, or combination of velocities, from carotid Doppler ultrasonography (DU), achieved the closest agreement with an assessment of suitability for carotid endarterectomy from intra-arterial angiograms (IAA). <em>Methods:</em> We prospectively collected data from 148 consecutive patients (288 carotids), who had DU and IAA (blinded assessment) before possible carotid endarterectomy. We halved our data by randomly selecting the left or right carotid artery for each patient. We used one half to calibrate our DU results to IAA (to decide which velocity corresponded with what degree of angiographic stenosis). Using this analysis, each artery in the other half of the data was defined as suitable (80–99% stenosed) or unsuitable for carotid endarterectomy. We evaluated every individual, and combination of, velocities (strategies) to see which gave the closest agreement with IAA. <em>Results:</em> Of all 80 strategies, six resulted in better agreement than others of the same or lower complexity. Five of these strategies gave better agreement than the internal carotid artery peak systolic velocity (ICA PSV) (kappa 0.78), but the improvement was small. <em>Conclusion:</em> Using the ICA PSV alone is adequate for assessing carotid stenosis before endarterectomy using DU, as long as the machine is calibrated to IAA. However, the addition of the ratio of the ICA PSV to the common carotid artery PSV adds only one further measurement, slightly increases the agreement with IAA, and would be reasonable to use on a daily basis.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":79592,"journal":{"name":"European journal of ultrasound : official journal of the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology","volume":"15 1","pages":"Pages 9-20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0929-8266(01)00168-9","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of ultrasound : official journal of the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0929826601001689","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate which velocity, or combination of velocities, from carotid Doppler ultrasonography (DU), achieved the closest agreement with an assessment of suitability for carotid endarterectomy from intra-arterial angiograms (IAA). Methods: We prospectively collected data from 148 consecutive patients (288 carotids), who had DU and IAA (blinded assessment) before possible carotid endarterectomy. We halved our data by randomly selecting the left or right carotid artery for each patient. We used one half to calibrate our DU results to IAA (to decide which velocity corresponded with what degree of angiographic stenosis). Using this analysis, each artery in the other half of the data was defined as suitable (80–99% stenosed) or unsuitable for carotid endarterectomy. We evaluated every individual, and combination of, velocities (strategies) to see which gave the closest agreement with IAA. Results: Of all 80 strategies, six resulted in better agreement than others of the same or lower complexity. Five of these strategies gave better agreement than the internal carotid artery peak systolic velocity (ICA PSV) (kappa 0.78), but the improvement was small. Conclusion: Using the ICA PSV alone is adequate for assessing carotid stenosis before endarterectomy using DU, as long as the machine is calibrated to IAA. However, the addition of the ratio of the ICA PSV to the common carotid artery PSV adds only one further measurement, slightly increases the agreement with IAA, and would be reasonable to use on a daily basis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
哪种多普勒速度最适合评估颈动脉内膜切除术的适用性?
目的:评估颈动脉多普勒超声(DU)的哪个速度或速度组合与动脉内血管造影(IAA)对颈动脉内膜切除术适用性的评估最接近。方法:我们前瞻性地收集了148名连续患者(288名颈动脉)的数据,这些患者在可能的颈动脉内膜切除术前进行了DU和IAA(盲法评估)。我们通过随机选择每位患者的左或右颈动脉,将数据减半。我们使用一半来将DU结果校准为IAA(以确定哪个速度对应于血管造影狭窄的程度)。使用该分析,另一半数据中的每条动脉被定义为适合(80-99%狭窄)或不适合颈动脉内膜切除术。我们评估了每一个个体及其组合的速度(策略),以确定哪一个与IAA最接近。结果:在所有80种策略中,有6种策略比其他具有相同或更低复杂性的策略达成了更好的一致性。其中五种策略比颈内动脉峰值收缩速度(ICA PSV)(κ0.78)更符合,但改善幅度较小。结论:在使用DU进行动脉内膜切除术之前,只要机器校准为IAA,单独使用ICA PSV就足以评估颈动脉狭窄。然而,增加颈内动脉PSV与颈总动脉PSV的比率只增加了一个进一步的测量,略微增加了与IAA的一致性,并且每天使用是合理的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Ultrasound assessment of the intima and media layers on the carotid arteries in peri- and postmenopausal women Subject Index Author Index Control system analysis of visually evoked blood flow regulation in humans under normocapnia and hypercapnia Effect of hypertension and candesartan on the blood flow velocity of the extraocular vessels in hypertensive patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1