The A-stage process to promote bioflocculation and microbial storage for carbon redirection: current perspectives and future research directions

IF 8.6 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology Pub Date : 2023-10-22 DOI:10.1007/s11157-023-09673-0
Ahmed AlSayed, Moomen Soliman, Ahmed Eldyasti
{"title":"The A-stage process to promote bioflocculation and microbial storage for carbon redirection: current perspectives and future research directions","authors":"Ahmed AlSayed,&nbsp;Moomen Soliman,&nbsp;Ahmed Eldyasti","doi":"10.1007/s11157-023-09673-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A progressive shift from energy-intensive wastewater treatment plants toward sustainable water resource recovery facilities (WRRFs) has gained traction over the years. The A-stage coupled with the B-stage shortcut biological nitrogen removal is enticing, owing to its efficacy in terms of land and energy conservation. This paper is a critical review of the A-stage process that provides a mechanistic understanding of its performance in terms of removal mechanisms, and the influence of its operational parameters. In accordance, future research directions are suggested to deepen the current understanding of the process, develop alternative technologies, and build more efficient WRRFs. Several factors such as HRT, SRT, DO concentration, OLR, chemical oxygen demand (COD) mass load, reactor VSS, feeding regime (i.e., feast/famine), and feast-to-famine retention time ratio independently affect the A-stage process. These factors alternate the substrate acquisition-based mechanisms from being transitional/preparatory mechanisms and typically overlooked in the conventional activated sludge process to critical removal mechanisms in the A-stage process. Although the influence of SRT on the A-stage process has been widely studied, this study demonstrated that SRT should be determined according to the influent COD fractionation and mass load. Moreover, it was inferred that a high DO concentration allows for high bioflocculation and storage under controlled SRT and HRT. Further research is needed to better understand the influence of HRT and feast-to-famine retention time ratio. Furthermore, there are discrepancies regarding the actual selection pressures that induce the substrate acquisition-based mechanisms which require further investigation and resolution.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":754,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology","volume":"22 4","pages":"1009 - 1035"},"PeriodicalIF":8.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11157-023-09673-0","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A progressive shift from energy-intensive wastewater treatment plants toward sustainable water resource recovery facilities (WRRFs) has gained traction over the years. The A-stage coupled with the B-stage shortcut biological nitrogen removal is enticing, owing to its efficacy in terms of land and energy conservation. This paper is a critical review of the A-stage process that provides a mechanistic understanding of its performance in terms of removal mechanisms, and the influence of its operational parameters. In accordance, future research directions are suggested to deepen the current understanding of the process, develop alternative technologies, and build more efficient WRRFs. Several factors such as HRT, SRT, DO concentration, OLR, chemical oxygen demand (COD) mass load, reactor VSS, feeding regime (i.e., feast/famine), and feast-to-famine retention time ratio independently affect the A-stage process. These factors alternate the substrate acquisition-based mechanisms from being transitional/preparatory mechanisms and typically overlooked in the conventional activated sludge process to critical removal mechanisms in the A-stage process. Although the influence of SRT on the A-stage process has been widely studied, this study demonstrated that SRT should be determined according to the influent COD fractionation and mass load. Moreover, it was inferred that a high DO concentration allows for high bioflocculation and storage under controlled SRT and HRT. Further research is needed to better understand the influence of HRT and feast-to-famine retention time ratio. Furthermore, there are discrepancies regarding the actual selection pressures that induce the substrate acquisition-based mechanisms which require further investigation and resolution.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
促进生物絮凝和微生物储存以实现碳重定向的A阶段过程:当前前景和未来研究方向
多年来,从能源密集型废水处理厂向可持续水资源回收设施(WRRF)的逐步转变受到了关注。A阶段与B阶段快捷生物脱氮相结合是诱人的,因为它在节约土地和能源方面具有功效。本文对a阶段工艺进行了批判性综述,从机理上了解了其去除机制的性能及其操作参数的影响。据此,提出了未来的研究方向,以加深目前对该过程的理解,开发替代技术,并构建更高效的WRRF。HRT、SRT、DO浓度、OLR、化学需氧量(COD)质量负荷、反应器VSS、进料制度(即盛宴/饥荒)和盛宴与饥荒保持时间比等几个因素独立影响A阶段过程。这些因素使基于底物获取的机制从传统活性污泥工艺中通常被忽视的过渡/准备机制转变为A阶段工艺中的关键去除机制。尽管SRT对A段工艺的影响已被广泛研究,但本研究表明,SRT应根据进水COD分级和质量负荷来确定。此外,推断出高DO浓度允许在受控SRT和HRT下进行高生物絮凝和储存。需要进一步的研究来更好地了解HRT和盛宴与饥荒保持时间比的影响。此外,在实际选择压力方面存在差异,这导致了需要进一步研究和解决的基于衬底获取的机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology
Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology Environmental Science-Waste Management and Disposal
CiteScore
25.00
自引率
1.40%
发文量
37
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology is a publication that offers easily comprehensible, reliable, and well-rounded perspectives and evaluations in the realm of environmental science and (bio)technology. It disseminates the most recent progressions and timely compilations of groundbreaking scientific discoveries, technological advancements, practical applications, policy developments, and societal concerns encompassing all facets of environmental science and (bio)technology. Furthermore, it tackles broader aspects beyond the natural sciences, incorporating subjects such as education, funding, policy-making, intellectual property, and societal influence.
期刊最新文献
The potential of biochar incorporation into agricultural soils to promote sustainable agriculture: insights from soil health, crop productivity, greenhouse gas emission mitigation and feasibility perspectives—a critical review Chemical interactions under the bark: bark-, ambrosia-, and wood-boring beetles and their microbial associates Biochar: a potential and green adsorbent for antibiotics removal from aqueous solution Unveiling the evolution of anaerobic membrane bioreactors: applications, fouling issues, and future perspective in wastewater treatment Correction to: Harnessing green tide Ulva biomass for carbon dioxide sequestration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1