Competing logics and reform strategies in local reform: A case study of administrative licensing reform in China

IF 1 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE Asian Politics & Policy Pub Date : 2022-11-15 DOI:10.1111/aspp.12666
Zhenjie Yang, Yuqing Liang, Mengyan Yu
{"title":"Competing logics and reform strategies in local reform: A case study of administrative licensing reform in China","authors":"Zhenjie Yang,&nbsp;Yuqing Liang,&nbsp;Mengyan Yu","doi":"10.1111/aspp.12666","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>How to balance the market and the government to promote local economic development and provide sufficient public services has always been a challenging issue for leaders, in face of the existence of varied interests and values of different stakeholders. Conflicting values between the market and the government are directly related to the competing logics between market orientation and bureaucratic/administrative dominance. Since China's transition from the planned economy or government dominance to marketization in 1978, a series of national and local innovations has been launched. Among those reforms, policy entrepreneurs played a critical role. Administrative licensing reform was one of key changes from the planned economy to the marketized economy. Through a local case in administrative licensing reform, this study explores how a policy entrepreneur at local level applied reform strategies to balance conflicting values and constrain the self-interested bureaucracy to achieve the marketization reform.</p>","PeriodicalId":44747,"journal":{"name":"Asian Politics & Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Politics & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aspp.12666","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

How to balance the market and the government to promote local economic development and provide sufficient public services has always been a challenging issue for leaders, in face of the existence of varied interests and values of different stakeholders. Conflicting values between the market and the government are directly related to the competing logics between market orientation and bureaucratic/administrative dominance. Since China's transition from the planned economy or government dominance to marketization in 1978, a series of national and local innovations has been launched. Among those reforms, policy entrepreneurs played a critical role. Administrative licensing reform was one of key changes from the planned economy to the marketized economy. Through a local case in administrative licensing reform, this study explores how a policy entrepreneur at local level applied reform strategies to balance conflicting values and constrain the self-interested bureaucracy to achieve the marketization reform.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
地方改革的竞争逻辑与改革策略——以中国行政许可改革为例
面对不同利益相关者的不同利益和价值观的存在,如何平衡市场和政府,促进地方经济发展,提供充足的公共服务,一直是领导人面临的一个具有挑战性的问题。市场与政府价值观的冲突直接关系到市场导向与官僚/行政主导之间的竞争逻辑。自1978年中国从计划经济或政府主导向市场化过渡以来,一系列国家和地方创新已经启动。在这些改革中,政策企业家发挥了关键作用。行政许可改革是从计划经济向市场经济转变的关键之一。通过一个地方行政许可改革的案例,本研究探讨了地方一级的政策企业家如何运用改革策略来平衡相互冲突的价值观,约束自利的官僚机构以实现市场化改革。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Asian Politics & Policy
Asian Politics & Policy POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
期刊最新文献
Issue Information The agency of small states in the United States-China rivalry The Hirschman effect re-examined from the perspective of security perception: A case study of Southeast Asian countries and China Inconsequential setback: The elusive impact of the Afghanistan withdrawal on Chinese assessment of US credibility Explaining the expansion of the NGO sector in China: Through the lense of adaptive corporatist governance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1