The absurdity of the latent disease model in mental health: 10,130,814 ways to have a DSM-5-TR psychological disorder.

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Journal of Mental Health Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-10 DOI:10.1080/09638237.2023.2278107
Nicholas C Borgogna, Tyler Owen, Stephen L Aita
{"title":"The absurdity of the latent disease model in mental health: 10,130,814 ways to have a DSM-5-TR psychological disorder.","authors":"Nicholas C Borgogna, Tyler Owen, Stephen L Aita","doi":"10.1080/09638237.2023.2278107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Latent disease classification is currently the accepted approach to mental illness diagnosis. In the United States, this takes the form of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-5-Text Revision (DSM-5-TR). Latent disease classification has been criticized for reliability and validity problems, particularly regarding diagnostic heterogeneity. No authors have calculated the scope of the heterogeneity problem of the entire DSM-5-TR.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>We addressed this issue by calculating the unique diagnostic profiles that exist for every DSM-5-TR diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We did this by applying formulas previously used in smaller heterogeneity analyses to all diagnoses within the DSM-5-TR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that there are 10,130,814 ways to be diagnosed with a mental illness using DSM-5-TR criteria. When specifiers are considered, this number balloons to over 161 septillion unique diagnostic presentations (driven mainly by bipolar II disorder). Additionally, there are 1,951,065 ways to present with psychiatric symptoms, yet not meet diagnostic criteria.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Latent disease classification leads to considerable heterogeneity in possible presentations. We provide examples of how latent disease classification harms research and treatment programs. We echo recommendations for the dismissal of latent disease classification as a mental illness diagnostic program.</p>","PeriodicalId":48135,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mental Health","volume":" ","pages":"451-459"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638237.2023.2278107","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Latent disease classification is currently the accepted approach to mental illness diagnosis. In the United States, this takes the form of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-5-Text Revision (DSM-5-TR). Latent disease classification has been criticized for reliability and validity problems, particularly regarding diagnostic heterogeneity. No authors have calculated the scope of the heterogeneity problem of the entire DSM-5-TR.

Aims: We addressed this issue by calculating the unique diagnostic profiles that exist for every DSM-5-TR diagnosis.

Methods: We did this by applying formulas previously used in smaller heterogeneity analyses to all diagnoses within the DSM-5-TR.

Results: We found that there are 10,130,814 ways to be diagnosed with a mental illness using DSM-5-TR criteria. When specifiers are considered, this number balloons to over 161 septillion unique diagnostic presentations (driven mainly by bipolar II disorder). Additionally, there are 1,951,065 ways to present with psychiatric symptoms, yet not meet diagnostic criteria.

Conclusions: Latent disease classification leads to considerable heterogeneity in possible presentations. We provide examples of how latent disease classification harms research and treatment programs. We echo recommendations for the dismissal of latent disease classification as a mental illness diagnostic program.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心理健康中潜在疾病模型的荒谬性:10130814种患有DSM-5-TR心理障碍的方法。
背景:隐性疾病分类是目前公认的精神疾病诊断方法。在美国,这采用了《精神疾病诊断和统计手册》的五文本修订版(DSM-5-TR)。潜在疾病分类因可靠性和有效性问题而受到批评,尤其是在诊断异质性方面。没有作者计算出整个DSM-5-TR的异质性问题的范围。声明:我们通过计算每个DSM-5-TR诊断存在的唯一诊断特征来解决这个问题。方法:我们通过将以前在较小异质性分析中使用的公式应用于DSM-5-TR中的所有诊断来做到这一点。结果:我们发现,使用DSM-5-TR标准,有10130814种方法可以诊断为精神疾病。当考虑到特异性时,这个数字膨胀到超过1619亿种独特的诊断表现(主要由双相情感障碍II驱动)。此外,还有1951065种方式可以表现出精神症状,但不符合诊断标准。结论:潜在疾病分类导致可能的表现具有相当大的异质性。我们提供了潜在疾病分类如何损害研究和治疗计划的例子。我们赞同将潜在疾病分类作为精神疾病诊断程序的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Mental Health
Journal of Mental Health PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.00%
发文量
117
期刊介绍: The Journal of Mental Health is an international forum for the latest research in the mental health field. Reaching over 65 countries, the journal reports on the best in evidence-based practice around the world and provides a channel of communication between the many disciplines involved in mental health research and practice. The journal encourages multi-disciplinary research and welcomes contributions that have involved the users of mental health services. The international editorial team are committed to seeking out excellent work from a range of sources and theoretical perspectives. The journal not only reflects current good practice but also aims to influence policy by reporting on innovations that challenge traditional ways of working.
期刊最新文献
Mental health literacy in secondary school teachers and interventions to improve it - a systematic review and narrative synthesis. Changes in sex differences in mental health over time: the moderating effects of educational status and loneliness. Statement of Retraction: Evaluation of the impact of a self-stigma reduction programme on psychosocial outcomes among people with schizophrenia spectrum disorder. The impact of social support on university students living with mental illness: a systematic review and narrative synthesis. The effectiveness of digital health technologies for reducing substance use among young people: a systematic review & meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1