Impacto laboral y psicológico de las segundas víctimas entre los profesionales sanitarios hospitalarios

IF 1.1 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Healthcare Quality Research Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jhqr.2023.06.002
A. González-González , O. Redondo-González , I. Domínguez-Osorio , V. Quero Palomino , M. León Velasco , F. Polo Montes
{"title":"Impacto laboral y psicológico de las segundas víctimas entre los profesionales sanitarios hospitalarios","authors":"A. González-González ,&nbsp;O. Redondo-González ,&nbsp;I. Domínguez-Osorio ,&nbsp;V. Quero Palomino ,&nbsp;M. León Velasco ,&nbsp;F. Polo Montes","doi":"10.1016/j.jhqr.2023.06.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To analyze the occupational and psychological consequences suffered by healthcare workers who are considered second victims (SV).</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>Observational, descriptive and cross-sectional study among the healthcare workers of a university hospital. The answers collected in a specifically designed questionnaire about psychological consequences at work and the result of a post-traumatic stress scale, “Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R, <em>spanish version</em>)” were evaluated. The variables between the groups were compared using the Chi square test (or Fisher's exact test) when both were qualitative and with the Student's T (or the Mann–Whitney U test for independent data), when one of them was quantitative. The level of statistical significance was <em>P</em>&lt;.05.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>75.5% (148/207) of the participants in the study suffered some adverse event (AE) and, of these, 88.5% (131/148) were considered SV.</p><p>Physicians had a 2.2 times higher risk of feeling SV than nurses (95% CI: 1.88-2.52). The impact on the patient related to the AE explained why the professionals involved in it felt SV (<em>P</em>=.037).</p><p>80.6% (<em>N</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->104) of the SVs presented post-traumatic stress. Women were 2.4 times more likely to suffer from it (OR: 2.4; 95% CI: 1.5-4.0).</p><p>Intrusive thoughts in the SV were almost three times more frequent when the damage suffered by the patient was permanent or death (OR: 2.5; 95% CI: 0.2-3.6).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Many healthcare workers, especially physicians, considered themselves to be SV, and many of them suffered from post-traumatic stress. The impact on the patient related to the AE was a risk factor for being SV and for suffering psychological consequences.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37347,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Healthcare Quality Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Healthcare Quality Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2603647923000301","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To analyze the occupational and psychological consequences suffered by healthcare workers who are considered second victims (SV).

Material and methods

Observational, descriptive and cross-sectional study among the healthcare workers of a university hospital. The answers collected in a specifically designed questionnaire about psychological consequences at work and the result of a post-traumatic stress scale, “Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R, spanish version)” were evaluated. The variables between the groups were compared using the Chi square test (or Fisher's exact test) when both were qualitative and with the Student's T (or the Mann–Whitney U test for independent data), when one of them was quantitative. The level of statistical significance was P<.05.

Results

75.5% (148/207) of the participants in the study suffered some adverse event (AE) and, of these, 88.5% (131/148) were considered SV.

Physicians had a 2.2 times higher risk of feeling SV than nurses (95% CI: 1.88-2.52). The impact on the patient related to the AE explained why the professionals involved in it felt SV (P=.037).

80.6% (N = 104) of the SVs presented post-traumatic stress. Women were 2.4 times more likely to suffer from it (OR: 2.4; 95% CI: 1.5-4.0).

Intrusive thoughts in the SV were almost three times more frequent when the damage suffered by the patient was permanent or death (OR: 2.5; 95% CI: 0.2-3.6).

Conclusions

Many healthcare workers, especially physicians, considered themselves to be SV, and many of them suffered from post-traumatic stress. The impact on the patient related to the AE was a risk factor for being SV and for suffering psychological consequences.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
第二受害者对医院卫生专业人员的工作和心理影响
目的分析被视为第二受害者的医护人员所遭受的职业和心理后果。材料和方法对某大学医院医护人员进行观察、描述性和横断面研究。在一份专门设计的关于工作中心理后果的问卷中收集的答案,以及创伤后应激量表“事件影响量表修订版(IES-R,西班牙语版)”的结果进行了评估。当两组变量都是定性的时,使用卡方检验(或Fisher精确检验)比较两组之间的变量,当其中一组变量是定量的时,则使用Student’s T(或独立数据的Mann-Whitney U检验)比较。统计学显著性水平为P<;。05.结果75.5%(148/207)的研究参与者遭受了一些不良事件(AE),其中88.5%(131/148)被认为是SV。医生感觉SV的风险是护士的2.2倍(95%CI:1.88-2.52)。与AE相关的对患者的影响解释了参与AE的专业人员感觉SV的原因(P=0.037)。80.6%(N=104)的SV表现为创伤后应激。女性患SV的可能性是女性的2.4倍(OR:2.4;95%CI:1.5-4.0)。当患者遭受的伤害是永久性的或死亡时,SV中的侵入性想法几乎是女性的三倍(OR=2.5;95%CI:0.2-3.6)。结论任何医护人员,尤其是医生,都认为自己是SV,他们中的许多人都患有创伤后应激。AE对患者的影响是SV和遭受心理后果的风险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
83
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Revista de Calidad Asistencial (Quality Healthcare) (RCA) is the official Journal of the Spanish Society of Quality Healthcare (Sociedad Española de Calidad Asistencial) (SECA) and is a tool for the dissemination of knowledge and reflection for the quality management of health services in Primary Care, as well as in Hospitals. It publishes articles associated with any aspect of research in the field of public health and health administration, including health education, epidemiology, medical statistics, health information, health economics, quality management, and health policies. The Journal publishes 6 issues, exclusively in electronic format. The Journal publishes, in Spanish, Original works, Special and Review Articles, as well as other sections. Articles are subjected to a rigorous, double blind, review process (peer review)
期刊最新文献
[A practical model to implement the patient participation in tertiary hospitals (ICE model)]. [Integrated social value generated in a specialized hospital for chronic patients]. Determinants of citizens' choice between public and private hospitals. Letter to the Editor on "Loneliness impact on healthcare utilization in primary care: A retrospective study". [Learning from our mistakes: Notification of pediatric events through SiNASP in Galicia].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1