Equilibrium optimizer: A novel optimization algorithm

IF 7.6 1区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Knowledge-Based Systems Pub Date : 2020-03-05 Epub Date: 2019-11-06 DOI:10.1016/j.knosys.2019.105190
Afshin Faramarzi , Mohammad Heidarinejad , Brent Stephens , Seyedali Mirjalili
{"title":"Equilibrium optimizer: A novel optimization algorithm","authors":"Afshin Faramarzi ,&nbsp;Mohammad Heidarinejad ,&nbsp;Brent Stephens ,&nbsp;Seyedali Mirjalili","doi":"10.1016/j.knosys.2019.105190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span><span>This paper presents a novel, optimization algorithm<span> called Equilibrium Optimizer (EO), inspired by control volume mass balance models used to estimate both dynamic and equilibrium states. In EO, each particle (solution) with its concentration (position) acts as a search agent. The search agents randomly update their concentration with respect to best-so-far solutions, namely equilibrium candidates, to finally reach to the equilibrium state (optimal result). A well-defined “generation rate” term is proved to invigorate EO’s ability in exploration, exploitation, and local minima avoidance. The proposed algorithm is benchmarked with 58 unimodal, multimodal, and composition functions and three engineering application problems. Results of EO are compared to three categories of existing optimization methods, including: (i) the most well-known meta-heuristics, including </span></span>Genetic Algorithm (GA), </span>Particle Swarm Optimization<span><span> (PSO); (ii) recently developed algorithms, including Grey Wolf Optimizer (GWO), Gravitational Search Algorithm (GSA), and Salp Swarm Algorithm (SSA); and (iii) high performance optimizers, including CMA-ES, SHADE, and LSHADE-SPACMA. Using average rank of </span>Friedman test<span><span>, for all 58 mathematical functions EO is able to outperform PSO, GWO, GA, GSA, SSA, and CMA-ES by 60%, 69%, 94%, 96%, 77%, and 64%, respectively, while it is outperformed by SHADE and LSHADE-SPACMA by 24% and 27%, respectively. The Bonferroni–Dunnand Holm’s tests for all functions showed that EO is significantly a better algorithm than PSO, GWO, GA, GSA, SSA and CMA-ES while its performance is statistically similar to SHADE and LSHADE-SPACMA. The </span>source code of EO is publicly availabe at </span></span></span><span>https://github.com/afshinfaramarzi/Equilibrium-Optimizer</span><svg><path></path></svg>, <span>http://built-envi.com/portfolio/equilibrium-optimizer/</span><svg><path></path></svg> and <span>http://www.alimirjalili.com/SourceCodes/EOcode.zip</span><svg><path></path></svg>.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49939,"journal":{"name":"Knowledge-Based Systems","volume":"191 ","pages":"Article 105190"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.knosys.2019.105190","citationCount":"1113","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knowledge-Based Systems","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950705119305295","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/11/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1113

Abstract

This paper presents a novel, optimization algorithm called Equilibrium Optimizer (EO), inspired by control volume mass balance models used to estimate both dynamic and equilibrium states. In EO, each particle (solution) with its concentration (position) acts as a search agent. The search agents randomly update their concentration with respect to best-so-far solutions, namely equilibrium candidates, to finally reach to the equilibrium state (optimal result). A well-defined “generation rate” term is proved to invigorate EO’s ability in exploration, exploitation, and local minima avoidance. The proposed algorithm is benchmarked with 58 unimodal, multimodal, and composition functions and three engineering application problems. Results of EO are compared to three categories of existing optimization methods, including: (i) the most well-known meta-heuristics, including Genetic Algorithm (GA), Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO); (ii) recently developed algorithms, including Grey Wolf Optimizer (GWO), Gravitational Search Algorithm (GSA), and Salp Swarm Algorithm (SSA); and (iii) high performance optimizers, including CMA-ES, SHADE, and LSHADE-SPACMA. Using average rank of Friedman test, for all 58 mathematical functions EO is able to outperform PSO, GWO, GA, GSA, SSA, and CMA-ES by 60%, 69%, 94%, 96%, 77%, and 64%, respectively, while it is outperformed by SHADE and LSHADE-SPACMA by 24% and 27%, respectively. The Bonferroni–Dunnand Holm’s tests for all functions showed that EO is significantly a better algorithm than PSO, GWO, GA, GSA, SSA and CMA-ES while its performance is statistically similar to SHADE and LSHADE-SPACMA. The source code of EO is publicly availabe at https://github.com/afshinfaramarzi/Equilibrium-Optimizer, http://built-envi.com/portfolio/equilibrium-optimizer/ and http://www.alimirjalili.com/SourceCodes/EOcode.zip.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
平衡优化器:一种新的优化算法
本文提出了一种新的优化算法,称为平衡优化器(EO),其灵感来自用于估计动态和平衡状态的控制体积质量平衡模型。在EO中,每个粒子(溶液)及其浓度(位置)都充当搜索剂。搜索代理根据迄今为止的最佳解,即平衡候选者,随机更新其浓度,以最终达到平衡状态(最佳结果)。一个定义明确的“生成率”术语被证明可以增强EO在勘探、开发和局部最小规避方面的能力。所提出的算法以58个单峰、多模态和组合函数以及三个工程应用问题为基准。将EO的结果与三类现有的优化方法进行了比较,包括:(i)最著名的元启发式方法,包括遗传算法(GA)、粒子群优化(PSO);(ii)最近开发的算法,包括灰太狼优化器(GWO)、引力搜索算法(GSA)和Salp Swarm算法(SSA);以及(iii)高性能优化器,包括CMA-ES、SHADE和LSHADE-SPAMMA。使用Friedman检验的平均秩,对于所有58个数学函数,EO能够分别优于PSO、GWO、GA、GSA、SSA和CMA-ES 60%、69%、94%、96%、77%和64%,而优于SHADE和LSHADE-SPASMA分别24%和27%。Bonferroni–Dunnand-Holm对所有函数的测试表明,EO是一种明显优于PSO、GWO、GA、GSA、SSA和CMA-ES的算法,其性能在统计上与SHADE和LSHADE-SPASMA相似。EO的源代码可在https://github.com/afshinfaramarzi/Equilibrium-Optimizer,http://built-envi.com/portfolio/equilibrium-optimizer/和http://www.alimirjalili.com/SourceCodes/EOcode.zip.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Knowledge-Based Systems
Knowledge-Based Systems 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
14.80
自引率
12.50%
发文量
1245
审稿时长
7.8 months
期刊介绍: Knowledge-Based Systems, an international and interdisciplinary journal in artificial intelligence, publishes original, innovative, and creative research results in the field. It focuses on knowledge-based and other artificial intelligence techniques-based systems. The journal aims to support human prediction and decision-making through data science and computation techniques, provide a balanced coverage of theory and practical study, and encourage the development and implementation of knowledge-based intelligence models, methods, systems, and software tools. Applications in business, government, education, engineering, and healthcare are emphasized.
期刊最新文献
Revisiting the role of linguistic knowledge in large language models through prompting ACO–PAL: A prior-Aware learning framework for local path planning in complex environments LLM-enabled universal traffic signal control across different intersections and traffic flows Multi-view semi-supervised classification via innovative graph construction and smoothness-aware graph convolution Galio: Defending ownership of AI-generated images against content-preserving tampering
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1