Involving psychological therapy stakeholders in responsible research to develop an automated feedback tool: Learnings from the ExTRAPPOLATE project

Journal of responsible technology Pub Date : 2022-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jrt.2022.100044

Jacob A Andrews , Mat Rawsthorne , Cosmin Manolescu , Matthew Burton McFaul , Blandine French , Elizabeth Rye , Rebecca McNaughton , Michael Baliousis , Sharron Smith , Sanchia Biswas , Erin Baker , Dean Repper , Yunfei Long , Tahseen Jilani , Jeremie Clos , Fred Higton , Nima Moghaddam , Sam Malins

{"title":"Involving psychological therapy stakeholders in responsible research to develop an automated feedback tool: Learnings from the ExTRAPPOLATE project","authors":"Jacob A Andrews , Mat Rawsthorne , Cosmin Manolescu , Matthew Burton McFaul , Blandine French , Elizabeth Rye , Rebecca McNaughton , Michael Baliousis , Sharron Smith , Sanchia Biswas , Erin Baker , Dean Repper , Yunfei Long , Tahseen Jilani , Jeremie Clos , Fred Higton , Nima Moghaddam , Sam Malins","doi":"10.1016/j.jrt.2022.100044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>Understanding stakeholders’ views on novel autonomous systems in healthcare is essential to ensure these are not abandoned after substantial investment has been made. The ExTRAPPOLATE project applied the principles of Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) in the development of an automated feedback system for psychological therapists, ‘AutoCICS’. A Patient and Practitioner Reference Group (PPRG) was convened over three online workshops to inform the system's development. Iterative workshops allowed proposed changes to the system (based on stakeholder comments) to be scrutinized. The PPRG reference group provided valuable insights, differentiated by role, including concerns and suggestions related to the applicability and acceptability of the system to different patients, as well as ethical considerations. The RRI approach enabled the anticipation of barriers to use, reflection on stakeholders’ views, effective engagement with stakeholders, and action to revise the design and proposed use of the system prior to testing in future planned feasibility and effectiveness studies. Many best practices and learnings can be taken from the application of RRI in the development of the AutoCICS system.</div>","PeriodicalId":73937,"journal":{"name":"Journal of responsible technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266665962200021X/pdfft?md5=aaad5f2bbda984671acf004f7fb61ea1&pid=1-s2.0-S266665962200021X-main.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of responsible technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266665962200021X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Abstract

Understanding stakeholders’ views on novel autonomous systems in healthcare is essential to ensure these are not abandoned after substantial investment has been made. The ExTRAPPOLATE project applied the principles of Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) in the development of an automated feedback system for psychological therapists, ‘AutoCICS’. A Patient and Practitioner Reference Group (PPRG) was convened over three online workshops to inform the system's development. Iterative workshops allowed proposed changes to the system (based on stakeholder comments) to be scrutinized. The PPRG reference group provided valuable insights, differentiated by role, including concerns and suggestions related to the applicability and acceptability of the system to different patients, as well as ethical considerations. The RRI approach enabled the anticipation of barriers to use, reflection on stakeholders’ views, effective engagement with stakeholders, and action to revise the design and proposed use of the system prior to testing in future planned feasibility and effectiveness studies. Many best practices and learnings can be taken from the application of RRI in the development of the AutoCICS system.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

让心理治疗利益相关者参与负责任的研究，开发自动化反馈工具：从ExTRAPPOLATE项目中学习

了解利益相关者对医疗保健中新型自主系统的看法对于确保在进行大量投资后不会放弃这些系统至关重要。ExTRAPPOLATE项目将负责任研究与创新（RRI）的原则应用于心理治疗师的自动反馈系统“AutoCICS”的开发。通过三个在线研讨会召集了一个患者和从业者参考小组（PPRG），为系统的发展提供信息。迭代研讨会允许对系统的拟议变更（基于利益相关者的意见）进行仔细审查。PPRG参考小组提供了按角色区分的有价值的见解，包括与该系统对不同患者的适用性和可接受性相关的担忧和建议，以及伦理考虑。RRI方法能够预测使用障碍，反思利益相关者的意见，与利益相关者进行有效接触，并在未来计划的可行性和有效性研究中进行测试之前，采取行动修改系统的设计和拟议使用。在AutoCICS系统的开发中，可以从RRI的应用中获得许多最佳实践和经验教训。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊