Health status, healthcare, and access in children with long-term medication use and difficulties with emotion, concentration, and behavior

Yuyin Yang, Beck L. Reyes MSN, CPNP-PC, CPN, Eufemia Jacob PhD, RN
{"title":"Health status, healthcare, and access in children with long-term medication use and difficulties with emotion, concentration, and behavior","authors":"Yuyin Yang,&nbsp;Beck L. Reyes MSN, CPNP-PC, CPN,&nbsp;Eufemia Jacob PhD, RN","doi":"10.1111/jcap.12371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Problem</h3>\n \n <p>Children with chronic conditions often have difficulties with emotions, concentration, and behaviors (ECB) and are not recognized and treated adequately. In this paper, long-term medication use (LTM) was adopted as a proxy for chronic illness due to the lack of consistent and standardized diagnostic criteria for chronic illnesses in children.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Children (8–12 years) were selected from the California Health Interview Survey (2017) based on: (1) households with children (&lt;12 years), (2) parent/adult caregivers report about child's health indicating “yes” to, (3) “does your child require prescription medicine for a health condition that has lasted or is expected to last at least 12 months or more,” and (4) “difficulties with ECB in past 6 months.”</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 1600 children were included by the CHIS data set, and children whose parental report had met the selection criteria were children with LTM (<i>n</i> = 144; 7.4 ± 2.9 years), ECB (<i>n</i> = 233; 8.16 ± 2.14), and both LTM + ECB (<i>n</i> = 62; 8.61 ± 1.81). Children with LTM+ ECB were Caucasian (56.4%), Hispanic (19.3%), and males (64.5%). Children with both LTM + ECB had two to three (33.87%) or at least four (53.2%) physician visits, and/or receiving special therapy (45.1%). Children with LTM had prescription delays (<i>n</i> = 144; 5.6%) and were not able to get medical care due to lack of insurance (<i>n</i> = 144; 6.9%). The majority of the children with LTM (54.2%) and LTM + ECB (43.5%) had parental employment-based insurance. More children that have both LTM and ECB (48.4%) than children with LTM, No ECB (32.9%) were on Medi-Cal/Medicaid.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Children with LTM need further evaluation for difficulties with ECB. Future studies are required to examine health status, healthcare use, and access for children with LTM and ECB.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":46587,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcap.12371","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Problem

Children with chronic conditions often have difficulties with emotions, concentration, and behaviors (ECB) and are not recognized and treated adequately. In this paper, long-term medication use (LTM) was adopted as a proxy for chronic illness due to the lack of consistent and standardized diagnostic criteria for chronic illnesses in children.

Methods

Children (8–12 years) were selected from the California Health Interview Survey (2017) based on: (1) households with children (<12 years), (2) parent/adult caregivers report about child's health indicating “yes” to, (3) “does your child require prescription medicine for a health condition that has lasted or is expected to last at least 12 months or more,” and (4) “difficulties with ECB in past 6 months.”

Findings

A total of 1600 children were included by the CHIS data set, and children whose parental report had met the selection criteria were children with LTM (n = 144; 7.4 ± 2.9 years), ECB (n = 233; 8.16 ± 2.14), and both LTM + ECB (n = 62; 8.61 ± 1.81). Children with LTM+ ECB were Caucasian (56.4%), Hispanic (19.3%), and males (64.5%). Children with both LTM + ECB had two to three (33.87%) or at least four (53.2%) physician visits, and/or receiving special therapy (45.1%). Children with LTM had prescription delays (n = 144; 5.6%) and were not able to get medical care due to lack of insurance (n = 144; 6.9%). The majority of the children with LTM (54.2%) and LTM + ECB (43.5%) had parental employment-based insurance. More children that have both LTM and ECB (48.4%) than children with LTM, No ECB (32.9%) were on Medi-Cal/Medicaid.

Conclusion

Children with LTM need further evaluation for difficulties with ECB. Future studies are required to examine health status, healthcare use, and access for children with LTM and ECB.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
长期用药和情绪、注意力和行为困难儿童的健康状况、医疗保健和获取途径
问题患有慢性病的儿童通常在情绪、注意力和行为(ECB)方面存在困难,并且没有得到充分的识别和治疗。在本文中,由于缺乏一致和标准化的儿童慢性病诊断标准,长期药物使用(LTM)被用作慢性病的替代品。方法从加州健康访谈调查(2017)中选择儿童(8-12岁),基于:(1)有孩子(<;12岁)的家庭,(2)父母/成人照顾者关于儿童健康的报告,表示“是”,(3)“您的孩子是否需要处方药来治疗已持续或预计将持续至少12个月或更长时间的健康状况”,以及(4)“过去6个月内ECB的困难”,父母报告符合选择标准的儿童为LTM儿童(n = 144;7.4 ± 2.9年),欧洲央行(n = 233;8.16 ± 2.14),以及两个LTM + ECB(n = 62;8.61 ± 1.81).LTM儿童+ ECB为高加索人(56.4%)、西班牙裔(19.3%)和男性(64.5%) + ECB有两到三次(33.87%)或至少四次(53.2%)就诊,和/或接受特殊治疗(45.1%) = 144;5.6%),并且由于缺乏保险而无法获得医疗护理(n = 144;6.9%)。大多数LTM儿童(54.2%)和LTM + 欧洲央行(43.5%)有基于父母就业的保险。同时患有LTM和ECB的儿童(48.4%)比患有LTM的儿童多,没有ECB的(32.9%)接受Medi-Cal/Medicaid。结论LTM患儿的ECB困难需要进一步评估。未来的研究需要检查LTM和ECB儿童的健康状况、医疗保健使用和获取情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Nursing (JCAPN) is the only nursing journal to focus exclusively on issues of child and adolescent mental health around the world. As a primary resource for nurses and other healthcare professionals in clinical practice, educator roles, and those conducting research in mental health and psychiatric care, the journal includes peer-reviewed, original articles from a wide range of contributors in a broad variety of settings.
期刊最新文献
Youth mental health crisis: What's next? Mental health conditions of Colombian adolescent population: An approach to risk Issue Information Soothing venipuncture: Bubble blowing and ball squeezing in reducing anxiety, fear, and pain in children Pediatric psychiatric inpatients' perspectives of aggression management: Discernment in the doorway
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1