Health reform in Brazil: The sanitaristas as programmatic actors

IF 2.7 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE European Policy Analysis Pub Date : 2021-01-24 DOI:10.1002/epa2.1107
Andreza Davidian
{"title":"Health reform in Brazil: The sanitaristas as programmatic actors","authors":"Andreza Davidian","doi":"10.1002/epa2.1107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Brazil has one of the largest public health systems in the world. By applying the Programmatic Action Framework (PAF), this study provides an endogenous explanation for the health reform and brings new lenses to understand one of the most successful cases of social protection expansion. It demonstrates the relevance of a group of professionals who had a common perception of why the policy should change and a coherent policy change program. Cognitive frameworks, organizational resources, and strong professional culture allowed the sanitaristas occupying key positions in the state apparatus, behaving strategically as a collective actor. The evidence provided suggests the approach's relevance to this case due to considerations of political-institutional specificities. Treating the <i>sanitaristas</i> as a programmatic actor is helpful to explain their role in promoting change and the endurance of the programmatic consensus they have built, which has been crucial to support the universal healthcare model in the country.</p>","PeriodicalId":52190,"journal":{"name":"European Policy Analysis","volume":"7 S1","pages":"64-95"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/epa2.1107","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Policy Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/epa2.1107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Brazil has one of the largest public health systems in the world. By applying the Programmatic Action Framework (PAF), this study provides an endogenous explanation for the health reform and brings new lenses to understand one of the most successful cases of social protection expansion. It demonstrates the relevance of a group of professionals who had a common perception of why the policy should change and a coherent policy change program. Cognitive frameworks, organizational resources, and strong professional culture allowed the sanitaristas occupying key positions in the state apparatus, behaving strategically as a collective actor. The evidence provided suggests the approach's relevance to this case due to considerations of political-institutional specificities. Treating the sanitaristas as a programmatic actor is helpful to explain their role in promoting change and the endurance of the programmatic consensus they have built, which has been crucial to support the universal healthcare model in the country.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴西的卫生改革:作为方案行动者的卫生工作者
巴西拥有世界上最大的公共卫生系统之一。通过应用方案行动框架(PAF),本研究为卫生改革提供了一种内生解释,并为理解扩大社会保护的最成功案例之一带来了新的视角。它展示了一群专业人士的相关性,他们对政策为什么应该改变有着共同的看法,并制定了一个连贯的政策改变计划。认知框架、组织资源和强大的职业文化使卫生工作者能够在国家机构中占据关键地位,作为一个集体行动者在战略上行事。所提供的证据表明,由于考虑到政治体制的特殊性,该方法与本案有关。将卫生工作者视为一个计划行动者,有助于解释他们在促进变革方面的作用,以及他们建立的计划共识的持久性,这对支持该国的全民医疗模式至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Policy Analysis
European Policy Analysis Social Sciences-Public Administration
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
32
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Networks and perception in European policymaking Is who they are, what they prefer? Understanding bureaucratic elites' policy preferences for European integration of government accounting Explaining differences in policy learning in the EU "Fit for 55” climate policy package Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1