Measuring pedagogical agent persona and the influence of agent persona on learning

IF 8.9 1区 教育学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Computers & Education Pub Date : 2017-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.compedu.2017.02.015
Noah L. Schroeder , William L. Romine , Scotty D. Craig
{"title":"Measuring pedagogical agent persona and the influence of agent persona on learning","authors":"Noah L. Schroeder ,&nbsp;William L. Romine ,&nbsp;Scotty D. Craig","doi":"10.1016/j.compedu.2017.02.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Pedagogical agents are virtual characters embedded within a learning environment to enhance student learning. Researchers are beginning to understand the conditions in which pedagogical agents can enhance learning, but many questions still remain. Namely, the field has few options in terms of measurement instruments, and limited research has investigated the influence of pedagogical agent persona, or the way the agent is perceived by students, on learning outcomes. In this study, we re-examine the Agent Persona Instrument (API) using confirmatory factor analysis<span> and Rasch methods. We then examine the influence of agent persona on learning outcomes using path analysis<span>. The results confirmed the four factor structure of the instrument, and the fit of items with the Rasch model demonstrates construct validity in our context. However, the analyses indicated that revisions to the instrument are warranted. The path analysis revealed that affective interaction significantly influenced information usefulness variables, however perceptions measured by the API had no significant impact on learning outcomes. Suggestions for revising the API are provided.</span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":10568,"journal":{"name":"Computers & Education","volume":"109 ","pages":"Pages 176-186"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.02.015","citationCount":"39","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers & Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360131517300477","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 39

Abstract

Pedagogical agents are virtual characters embedded within a learning environment to enhance student learning. Researchers are beginning to understand the conditions in which pedagogical agents can enhance learning, but many questions still remain. Namely, the field has few options in terms of measurement instruments, and limited research has investigated the influence of pedagogical agent persona, or the way the agent is perceived by students, on learning outcomes. In this study, we re-examine the Agent Persona Instrument (API) using confirmatory factor analysis and Rasch methods. We then examine the influence of agent persona on learning outcomes using path analysis. The results confirmed the four factor structure of the instrument, and the fit of items with the Rasch model demonstrates construct validity in our context. However, the analyses indicated that revisions to the instrument are warranted. The path analysis revealed that affective interaction significantly influenced information usefulness variables, however perceptions measured by the API had no significant impact on learning outcomes. Suggestions for revising the API are provided.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教学主体人格的测量及其对学习的影响
教学代理人是嵌入学习环境中的虚拟人物,以增强学生的学习。研究人员开始了解教学代理人可以增强学习的条件,但仍有许多问题。也就是说,该领域在测量工具方面几乎没有选择,而且有限的研究调查了教学代理人角色或学生感知代理人的方式对学习结果的影响。在本研究中,我们使用验证性因素分析和Rasch方法重新检查了代理人格工具(API)。然后,我们使用路径分析来检验代理角色对学习结果的影响。结果证实了该工具的四因素结构,项目与Rasch模型的拟合证明了我们语境中的结构有效性。然而,分析表明,有必要对该文书进行修订。路径分析表明,情感互动显著影响信息有用性变量,但API测量的感知对学习结果没有显著影响。提出了修订API的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Computers & Education
Computers & Education 工程技术-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
27.10
自引率
5.80%
发文量
204
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: Computers & Education seeks to advance understanding of how digital technology can improve education by publishing high-quality research that expands both theory and practice. The journal welcomes research papers exploring the pedagogical applications of digital technology, with a focus broad enough to appeal to the wider education community.
期刊最新文献
Harmony in diversity: Digital literacy research in a multidisciplinary landscape Understanding the gender divide in digital literacy in four European countries: A comprehensive decomposition analysis using unconditional quantile regression Eye tracking technology for examining cognitive processes in education: A systematic review Enhancing peer feedback provision through user interface scaffolding: A comparative examination of scripting and self-monitoring techniques Understanding college students’ cross-device learning behavior in the wild: Device ecologies, physical configurations, usage patterns, and attention issues
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1