Maximum matchings in graphs for allocating kidney paired donation

IF 1.5 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Operations Research for Health Care Pub Date : 2020-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.orhc.2020.100246
Sommer Gentry , Michal A. Mankowski , T.S. Michael
{"title":"Maximum matchings in graphs for allocating kidney paired donation","authors":"Sommer Gentry ,&nbsp;Michal A. Mankowski ,&nbsp;T.S. Michael","doi":"10.1016/j.orhc.2020.100246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Living donors are often incompatible with their intended recipients. Kidney paired donation matches one patient and his or her incompatible donor with another pair in the same situation for an exchange. Let patient-donor pairs be the vertices of an undirected graph <span><math><mi>G</mi></math></span>, with edges connecting reciprocally compatible vertices. A matching in <span><math><mi>G</mi></math></span> is a feasible set of paired donations. Because the lifespan of a transplant depends on the immunologic concordance of donor and recipient, we weight the edges of <span><math><mi>G</mi></math></span> and seek a maximum edge-weight matching. Unfortunately, such matchings might not have the maximum cardinality; there is a risk of an unpredictable trade-off between quality and quantity of paired donations. We prove that the number of paired donations is within a multiplicative factor of the maximum possible donations, where the factor depends on the edge weighting. We propose an edge weighting of <span><math><mi>G</mi></math></span> which guarantees that every matching with maximum weight also has maximum cardinality, and also maximizes the number of transplants for an exceptional subset of recipients, while favoring immunologic concordance. We partially generalize this result to k-way exchange and chains, and we implement our weightings using a real patient dataset from Brazil.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46320,"journal":{"name":"Operations Research for Health Care","volume":"25 ","pages":"Article 100246"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.orhc.2020.100246","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Operations Research for Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211692320300266","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Living donors are often incompatible with their intended recipients. Kidney paired donation matches one patient and his or her incompatible donor with another pair in the same situation for an exchange. Let patient-donor pairs be the vertices of an undirected graph G, with edges connecting reciprocally compatible vertices. A matching in G is a feasible set of paired donations. Because the lifespan of a transplant depends on the immunologic concordance of donor and recipient, we weight the edges of G and seek a maximum edge-weight matching. Unfortunately, such matchings might not have the maximum cardinality; there is a risk of an unpredictable trade-off between quality and quantity of paired donations. We prove that the number of paired donations is within a multiplicative factor of the maximum possible donations, where the factor depends on the edge weighting. We propose an edge weighting of G which guarantees that every matching with maximum weight also has maximum cardinality, and also maximizes the number of transplants for an exceptional subset of recipients, while favoring immunologic concordance. We partially generalize this result to k-way exchange and chains, and we implement our weightings using a real patient dataset from Brazil.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于分配肾脏配对捐赠的图中的最大匹配
活体捐赠者往往与其预定的接受者不相容。肾脏配对捐赠将一名患者及其不相容的捐赠者与另一对处于相同情况的患者配对进行交换。设患者-供体对是无向图G的顶点,边连接相互兼容的顶点。G中的匹配是一组可行的成对捐赠。因为移植的寿命取决于供体和受体的免疫一致性,我们对G的边缘进行加权,并寻求最大的边缘权重匹配。不幸的是,这样的匹配可能没有最大基数;配对捐赠的质量和数量之间存在不可预测的权衡风险。我们证明了配对捐赠的数量在最大可能捐赠的乘积因子内,其中该因子取决于边缘权重。我们提出了G的边缘加权,它保证每一个具有最大权重的匹配也具有最大基数,并且也最大化了特殊受体子集的移植数量,同时有利于免疫一致性。我们将这一结果部分推广到k路交换和链,并使用来自巴西的真实患者数据集实现我们的权重。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Operations Research for Health Care
Operations Research for Health Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
69 days
期刊最新文献
Predicting leishmaniasis outbreaks in Brazil using machine learning models based on disease surveillance and meteorological data Editorial Board Preference-based allocation of patients to nursing homes Balancing continuity of care and home care schedule costs using blueprint routes Outpatient appointment systems: A new heuristic with patient classification
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1