Media multitasking, impulsivity and dual task ability

IF 8.9 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Computers in Human Behavior Pub Date : 2019-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2018.11.018
Myoungju Shin , Andrew Webb , Eva Kemps
{"title":"Media multitasking, impulsivity and dual task ability","authors":"Myoungju Shin ,&nbsp;Andrew Webb ,&nbsp;Eva Kemps","doi":"10.1016/j.chb.2018.11.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>With recent developments in technology, media multitasking is an ever-increasing phenomenon. Although most studies associate media multitasking with high impulsivity and poorer cognitive performance, findings in the literature have been mixed, with some studies suggesting the opposite. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between media multitasking and the capacity to exert inhibitory control<span>, as well as the ability to multitask in a multisensory setting. Results showed that media multitasking was associated with high attentional impulsivity and lower initiatory self-control, but not with inhibitory self-control. Relatedly, heavy media multitaskers were slower and showed more omission errors on the go/no-go task, suggestive of inattention; however, they were better at inhibiting already initiated motoric responses in the stop signal task. Media multitasking was further associated with faster responses when a letter and a tone task were temporally separated, but not when they were presented closer in time. Taken together, the results suggest a more nuanced relationship between media multitasking, personality and cognitive ability than has previously been thought. This has important real life implications for media multitasking, showing both advantages and disadvantages.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":48471,"journal":{"name":"Computers in Human Behavior","volume":"92 ","pages":"Pages 160-168"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.chb.2018.11.018","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in Human Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563218305533","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

With recent developments in technology, media multitasking is an ever-increasing phenomenon. Although most studies associate media multitasking with high impulsivity and poorer cognitive performance, findings in the literature have been mixed, with some studies suggesting the opposite. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between media multitasking and the capacity to exert inhibitory control, as well as the ability to multitask in a multisensory setting. Results showed that media multitasking was associated with high attentional impulsivity and lower initiatory self-control, but not with inhibitory self-control. Relatedly, heavy media multitaskers were slower and showed more omission errors on the go/no-go task, suggestive of inattention; however, they were better at inhibiting already initiated motoric responses in the stop signal task. Media multitasking was further associated with faster responses when a letter and a tone task were temporally separated, but not when they were presented closer in time. Taken together, the results suggest a more nuanced relationship between media multitasking, personality and cognitive ability than has previously been thought. This has important real life implications for media multitasking, showing both advantages and disadvantages.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
媒体多任务处理、冲动和双重任务能力
随着技术的发展,媒体多任务处理是一种日益增长的现象。尽管大多数研究将媒体多任务处理与高冲动性和较差的认知表现联系在一起,但文献中的发现喜忧参半,一些研究表明情况恰恰相反。本研究的目的是调查媒体多任务处理与施加抑制性控制的能力以及在多感官环境中多任务处理的能力之间的关系。结果表明,媒体多任务处理与高注意力冲动和低启动自我控制有关,但与抑制性自我控制无关。与此相关的是,重度媒体多任务处理者在进行/不进行任务时速度较慢,表现出更多的遗漏错误,这表明他们注意力不集中;然而,他们在停止信号任务中更善于抑制已经启动的运动反应。当字母和音调任务在时间上分开时,媒体多任务处理与更快的反应进一步相关,但当它们在时间上更接近时则没有。总之,研究结果表明,媒体多任务处理、个性和认知能力之间的关系比以前想象的更为微妙。这对媒体多任务处理有着重要的现实意义,既有优点也有缺点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
19.10
自引率
4.00%
发文量
381
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: Computers in Human Behavior is a scholarly journal that explores the psychological aspects of computer use. It covers original theoretical works, research reports, literature reviews, and software and book reviews. The journal examines both the use of computers in psychology, psychiatry, and related fields, and the psychological impact of computer use on individuals, groups, and society. Articles discuss topics such as professional practice, training, research, human development, learning, cognition, personality, and social interactions. It focuses on human interactions with computers, considering the computer as a medium through which human behaviors are shaped and expressed. Professionals interested in the psychological aspects of computer use will find this journal valuable, even with limited knowledge of computers.
期刊最新文献
From bodily to digital co-presence: Unpacking the Interaction Ritual Chains of hashtag-driven group formation Neural correlates of how different emotional reactions elicited by emojis influence facial expression processing From facial expressions to academic performance: Affective computing reveals the serial mediating roles of emotional valence and self-regulated learning To share or not to share, that is the (moral) question: How moral frames and bystander cues shape health misinformation correction sharing on social media Exploring protective and risk factors for a positive sexting experience among young adults – insights from the SEX-THINK! Project
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1