The actorhood imperative. On universities as organisational actors

IF 2.6 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH European Journal of Higher Education Pub Date : 2021-11-23 DOI:10.1080/21568235.2021.2004184
R. Bloch
{"title":"The actorhood imperative. On universities as organisational actors","authors":"R. Bloch","doi":"10.1080/21568235.2021.2004184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Organisational actorhood denotes the agency and capacity of organisations to act for and out of themselves. Sociological neoinstitutionalism has shown how notions of empowered actorhood have spread globally and across modern society. It has however neglected how organisations act upon this notion. Drawing on Foucault’s writings on governmentality, actorhood can be conceived as a ‘technology of the self’ that allows individuals (and organisations) to define how to act for themselves. Understanding actorhood as an imperative to take action in the name of the self, the paper extends the neoinstitutional perspective to account for how organisations perform actorhood. Taking organisational action as starting point for analysing organisational actors allows to overcome the passive conformity of organisations vis-à-vis environmental expectations. This perspective is applied to empirical findings on how German universities act as organisations in teaching. Though actorhood was highly scripted by a national funding scheme, universities more or less used the extra resources to pursue their own goals. Focussing on organisational action shows that universities as organisational actors do not just respond to environmental expecations but act within a field of possible actions that simultaneously pushes and constrains actorhood. The paper therefore proposes to study how universities act as organisational actors.","PeriodicalId":37345,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Higher Education","volume":"118 17","pages":"489 - 505"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2021.2004184","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

ABSTRACT Organisational actorhood denotes the agency and capacity of organisations to act for and out of themselves. Sociological neoinstitutionalism has shown how notions of empowered actorhood have spread globally and across modern society. It has however neglected how organisations act upon this notion. Drawing on Foucault’s writings on governmentality, actorhood can be conceived as a ‘technology of the self’ that allows individuals (and organisations) to define how to act for themselves. Understanding actorhood as an imperative to take action in the name of the self, the paper extends the neoinstitutional perspective to account for how organisations perform actorhood. Taking organisational action as starting point for analysing organisational actors allows to overcome the passive conformity of organisations vis-à-vis environmental expectations. This perspective is applied to empirical findings on how German universities act as organisations in teaching. Though actorhood was highly scripted by a national funding scheme, universities more or less used the extra resources to pursue their own goals. Focussing on organisational action shows that universities as organisational actors do not just respond to environmental expecations but act within a field of possible actions that simultaneously pushes and constrains actorhood. The paper therefore proposes to study how universities act as organisational actors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
演员身份势在必行。论大学作为组织行动者
组织行为能力指的是组织为自身和脱离自身而行动的代理和能力。社会学新制度主义已经表明,授权行为的概念是如何在全球和整个现代社会传播的。然而,它忽略了组织如何根据这一概念采取行动。根据福柯关于治理的著作,行为可以被认为是一种“自我的技术”,它允许个人(和组织)定义如何为自己行动。将行为理解为以自我的名义采取行动的必要条件,本文扩展了新制度的视角来解释组织如何执行行为。以组织行动作为分析组织行为者的起点,可以克服组织对-à-vis环境期望的被动遵从。这一观点适用于德国大学如何作为教学组织的实证研究结果。尽管国家资助计划高度照本办事,但大学或多或少地利用额外的资源来追求自己的目标。关注组织行动表明,作为组织行动者的大学不仅要对环境期望做出反应,而且要在一个可能的行动领域内行动,同时推动和限制行为。因此,本文提出研究大学如何作为组织行动者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Higher Education
European Journal of Higher Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Higher Education (EJHE) aims to offer comprehensive coverage of theoretical and methodological approaches to the study of higher education, analyses of European and national higher education reforms and processes, and European comparative studies or comparisons between European and non-European higher education systems and institutions. Building on the successful legacy of its predecessor, Higher Education in Europe, EJHE is establishing itself as one of the flagship journals in the study of higher education and specifically in study of European higher education.
期刊最新文献
Finding your feet in the dark: how making teaching and learning visible enables change in course and assessment design Workplace bullying, stress, burnout, and the role of perceived social support: findings from a Swedish national prevalence study in higher education ‘To go or not to go’: organizational determinants of academic staff participation in teaching mobility – a structural equation modelling approach ‘It’s like two different worlds’: the multifaceted nature of social support in students’ transition from high school to a problem-based learning undergraduate programme Between short-term and medium-to-long-term responses: mapping the impact of COVID-19 on Italian universities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1