Reliability of Self-Screening for Intrinsic Capacity Impairments Using the ICOPE Monitor App.

IF 2 3区 化学 Q3 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL International Journal of Quantum Chemistry Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.14283/jfa.2023.34
E Gonzalez-Bautista, P de Souto Barreto, N Tavassoli, C Ranarijhon, J S Pons, Y Rolland, S Andrieu, J Delrieu
{"title":"Reliability of Self-Screening for Intrinsic Capacity Impairments Using the ICOPE Monitor App.","authors":"E Gonzalez-Bautista, P de Souto Barreto, N Tavassoli, C Ranarijhon, J S Pons, Y Rolland, S Andrieu, J Delrieu","doi":"10.14283/jfa.2023.34","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To verify the inter-rater agreement of the Integrated Care for Older People (ICOPE) STEP 1 screening tool using the ICOPE Monitor app, comparing self-assessment to a screening performed by a health professional.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We compared the results of the ICOPE Step 1 obtained by self-screening with those obtained by a professional screening using Gwet's agreement coefficient in two studies. Study 1 tested inter-rater reliability in participants to the INSPIRE-T cohort who agreed to undergo the self-and the professional screening on the same day. Study 2 used data from the INSPIRE-ICOPE care cohort. We included real-life users of the French health system whose first ICOPE Step 1 was a self-assessment followed by a professional Step 1within 130 days (mean=76 days, SD=60).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Study 1 included 79 participants (45 aged less than 60, 34 aged 60 and over, 60% female, mean (SD) age of 54.5 (18.5) years). Of the 207 participants in Study 2, 49 were less than 60, and 158 were 60 and over (54% female, mean (SD) age 67 (16.1) years). Agreement coefficients in Study 1 ranged from 0.49 (CI95% 0.24; 0.66) in the cognition domain - moderate agreement) to 0.99 (CI95% 0.96;1.00) in the nutrition domain - very good agreement); and in Study 2 from 0.36 (CI95% 0.23;0.49) in the cognition domain to 0.97 (95% 0.95;1.00) in the nutrition domain. The agreement coefficients for the cognition and hearing domains were higher for the participants aged <60 than those aged 60 and over. The time orientation items (cognition) showed high reliability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study supports using ICOPE Step 1 as a self-assessment screening tool. High reliability was found for intrinsic capacity's nutrition, psychological, and locomotion domains, regardless of age. We discuss aspects of the self-assessment of cognition, vision, and hearing domains when using the ICOPE monitor app in older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":182,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Quantum Chemistry","volume":"106 12","pages":"291-297"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Quantum Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14283/jfa.2023.34","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To verify the inter-rater agreement of the Integrated Care for Older People (ICOPE) STEP 1 screening tool using the ICOPE Monitor app, comparing self-assessment to a screening performed by a health professional.

Methods: We compared the results of the ICOPE Step 1 obtained by self-screening with those obtained by a professional screening using Gwet's agreement coefficient in two studies. Study 1 tested inter-rater reliability in participants to the INSPIRE-T cohort who agreed to undergo the self-and the professional screening on the same day. Study 2 used data from the INSPIRE-ICOPE care cohort. We included real-life users of the French health system whose first ICOPE Step 1 was a self-assessment followed by a professional Step 1within 130 days (mean=76 days, SD=60).

Results: Study 1 included 79 participants (45 aged less than 60, 34 aged 60 and over, 60% female, mean (SD) age of 54.5 (18.5) years). Of the 207 participants in Study 2, 49 were less than 60, and 158 were 60 and over (54% female, mean (SD) age 67 (16.1) years). Agreement coefficients in Study 1 ranged from 0.49 (CI95% 0.24; 0.66) in the cognition domain - moderate agreement) to 0.99 (CI95% 0.96;1.00) in the nutrition domain - very good agreement); and in Study 2 from 0.36 (CI95% 0.23;0.49) in the cognition domain to 0.97 (95% 0.95;1.00) in the nutrition domain. The agreement coefficients for the cognition and hearing domains were higher for the participants aged <60 than those aged 60 and over. The time orientation items (cognition) showed high reliability.

Conclusion: Our study supports using ICOPE Step 1 as a self-assessment screening tool. High reliability was found for intrinsic capacity's nutrition, psychological, and locomotion domains, regardless of age. We discuss aspects of the self-assessment of cognition, vision, and hearing domains when using the ICOPE monitor app in older adults.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用ICOPE监测应用程序自我筛查内在能力障碍的可靠性
目的:验证使用ICOPE Monitor应用程序的老年人综合护理(ICOPE)第1步筛查工具的评分者之间的一致性,将自我评估与健康专业人员进行的筛查进行比较。方法:在两项研究中,我们将自我筛选获得的ICOPE第1步结果与使用Gwet一致系数进行专业筛选获得的结果进行比较。研究1测试了INSPIRE-T队列参与者的内部信度,这些参与者同意在同一天接受自我和专业筛查。研究2使用的数据来自INSPIRE-ICOPE护理队列。我们纳入了法国卫生系统的真实用户,他们的第一个ICOPE第1步是自我评估,随后是130天内的专业第1步(平均=76天,SD=60)。结果:研究1纳入79名参与者(60岁以下45名,60岁及以上34名,60%为女性,平均(SD)年龄54.5(18.5)岁)。在研究2的207名参与者中,49名小于60岁,158名60岁及以上(54%为女性,平均(SD)年龄为67(16.1)岁)。研究1的一致系数为0.49 (CI95% 0.24;在认知领域(0.66)-中等一致性)到营养领域(0.99 (CI95% 0.96;1.00) -非常好的一致性);在研究2中,认知领域的得分从0.36 (CI95% 0.23;0.49)上升到0.97(95% 0.95;1.00)。结论:本研究支持使用ICOPE第1步作为自我评估筛选工具。内在能力的营养、心理和运动领域的可靠性与年龄无关。我们讨论了在老年人中使用ICOPE监测应用程序时对认知、视觉和听力领域的自我评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Quantum Chemistry
International Journal of Quantum Chemistry 化学-数学跨学科应用
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
4.50%
发文量
185
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Since its first formulation quantum chemistry has provided the conceptual and terminological framework necessary to understand atoms, molecules and the condensed matter. Over the past decades synergistic advances in the methodological developments, software and hardware have transformed quantum chemistry in a truly interdisciplinary science that has expanded beyond its traditional core of molecular sciences to fields as diverse as chemistry and catalysis, biophysics, nanotechnology and material science.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Theoretical Study on the Design of a New Byproduct Free XLPE-Based Insulation Functional Network Based on Click Chemistry: A Viable Alternative to Peroxide Cross-Linking Theoretical Study on the Design of a New Byproduct Free XLPE-Based Insulation Functional Network Based on Click Chemistry: A Viable Alternative to Peroxide Cross-Linking Using CO Adsorption on Cu Surfaces to Benchmark DFT Parameters for Catalytic Modeling Diatomic Metal–Organic Framework Cathode Catalysts for Efficient Oxygen Electrocatalysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1