Outcomes of a co-produced and co-delivered relaxation course for service users and staff at a secure mental health service

L. Johnson, Kelly E. Elsegood, Frances Browne
{"title":"Outcomes of a co-produced and co-delivered relaxation course for service users and staff at a secure mental health service","authors":"L. Johnson, Kelly E. Elsegood, Frances Browne","doi":"10.1108/jmhtep-09-2020-0068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to gauge the usefulness of a Recovery College relaxation course for both staff and service users within a secure mental health setting.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe course compromised of seven stand alone sessions, each teaching a different relaxation skill. Pre- and Post questionnaires were administered comprising of two closed and one open ended questions.\n\n\nFindings\nParticipants (n = 49) reported an average decrease of 32% in pre- and post-session tension. Ninety-two percent of evaluative responses endorsed sessions as “worthwhile” and 92% endorsed the relaxation skills as “useful in the future”. Participants described the workshops as “enjoyable” and “relaxing”.\n\n\nPractical implications\nIn the spirit of Recovery Colleges, the course offers the opportunity for individuals with lived experience to participate in the production and delivery of interventions. Improving both staff and service user well-being is cost-effective and may help to normalise and de-stigmatise difficulties with stress and anxiety.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nTo the best of the authors’ knowledge, this appears to be the first evaluation of a co-produced and co-delivered relaxation course for both staff and service users within inpatient mental health settings. This paper presents a preliminary evaluation of a novel intervention to improve staff and service user well-being.\n","PeriodicalId":75090,"journal":{"name":"The journal of mental health training, education, and practice","volume":"179 S444","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of mental health training, education, and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jmhtep-09-2020-0068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to gauge the usefulness of a Recovery College relaxation course for both staff and service users within a secure mental health setting. Design/methodology/approach The course compromised of seven stand alone sessions, each teaching a different relaxation skill. Pre- and Post questionnaires were administered comprising of two closed and one open ended questions. Findings Participants (n = 49) reported an average decrease of 32% in pre- and post-session tension. Ninety-two percent of evaluative responses endorsed sessions as “worthwhile” and 92% endorsed the relaxation skills as “useful in the future”. Participants described the workshops as “enjoyable” and “relaxing”. Practical implications In the spirit of Recovery Colleges, the course offers the opportunity for individuals with lived experience to participate in the production and delivery of interventions. Improving both staff and service user well-being is cost-effective and may help to normalise and de-stigmatise difficulties with stress and anxiety. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this appears to be the first evaluation of a co-produced and co-delivered relaxation course for both staff and service users within inpatient mental health settings. This paper presents a preliminary evaluation of a novel intervention to improve staff and service user well-being.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在一家安全的心理健康服务机构为服务使用者和工作人员共同制作和提供的放松课程的成果
目的本研究旨在评估康复学院放松课程在安全的心理健康环境下对员工和服务使用者的有用性。设计/方法/方法该课程包括七个独立的课程,每个课程教授不同的放松技巧。前后问卷由两个封闭式问题和一个开放式问题组成。研究结果:49名参与者报告说,他们在训练前和训练后的紧张程度平均下降了32%。92%的评估性回答认为课程“值得”,92%的人认为放松技巧“在未来有用”。参加者形容工作坊“令人愉快”和“放松”。实践意义本着康复学院的精神,该课程为有实际经验的个人提供了参与干预措施的制作和交付的机会。改善工作人员和服务使用者的福祉具有成本效益,可能有助于使压力和焦虑带来的困难正常化和消除污名化。原创性/价值据作者所知,这似乎是第一次对住院精神卫生机构的工作人员和服务用户共同制作和共同提供的放松课程进行评估。本文提出了一种新的干预措施的初步评估,以提高员工和服务用户的福祉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mindful self-compassion training program in the family caregivers of patients with cancer: a quasi-experimental study Pedagogical considerations for enhancing peer support training in an online university environment Comparing the attitudes of junior doctors towards mental and physical ill-health: a survey of trainees in North London “Improved access, delayed accreditation, low recognition”: perspectives of mental health educators, preceptors and students on the Kintampo Project in Ghana Analysis and mapping of scientific literature on virtual and augmented reality technologies used in the context of mental health disorders (1980 – 2021)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1