Business Process Risk Modelling in Theory and Practice

M. Špaček
{"title":"Business Process Risk Modelling in Theory and Practice","authors":"M. Špaček","doi":"10.12776/QIP.V25I1.1551","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The purpose of the paper is to introduce SW based decision-making tool that helps managers cope with risks and uncertainties of selected industrial processes. The solution is substantiated by the theoretical background. Methodology/Approach: The research is based on combination of contextual interviews with process management experts and Business Process Modelling Notion (BPMN). The former is aimed at the identification of industrial processes with highest risk exposure the latter is conducive to the design of processes to be subjected to stochastic simulation. Findings: The findings show that the risks and uncertainties in the management of industrial processes can be kept under control when using advanced tools of risk analysis as simulation approaches. The solution proposed comes in handy to risk analysts or process managers. Research Limitation/Implication: The library of process models which were included into stochastic simulation includes selected processes as investments, service providing or economic value-added engineering. Additional processes are being included on ongoing basis. Originality/Value of paper: The paper offers the solution to industrial process risk management which goes far beyond academic sphere and provides industrial practitioners SW tool that facilitates process risk management. Category: Technical paper","PeriodicalId":44057,"journal":{"name":"Quality Innovation Prosperity-Kvalita Inovacia Prosperita","volume":"88 2","pages":"55-72"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality Innovation Prosperity-Kvalita Inovacia Prosperita","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12776/QIP.V25I1.1551","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of the paper is to introduce SW based decision-making tool that helps managers cope with risks and uncertainties of selected industrial processes. The solution is substantiated by the theoretical background. Methodology/Approach: The research is based on combination of contextual interviews with process management experts and Business Process Modelling Notion (BPMN). The former is aimed at the identification of industrial processes with highest risk exposure the latter is conducive to the design of processes to be subjected to stochastic simulation. Findings: The findings show that the risks and uncertainties in the management of industrial processes can be kept under control when using advanced tools of risk analysis as simulation approaches. The solution proposed comes in handy to risk analysts or process managers. Research Limitation/Implication: The library of process models which were included into stochastic simulation includes selected processes as investments, service providing or economic value-added engineering. Additional processes are being included on ongoing basis. Originality/Value of paper: The paper offers the solution to industrial process risk management which goes far beyond academic sphere and provides industrial practitioners SW tool that facilitates process risk management. Category: Technical paper
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
业务流程风险建模的理论与实践
目的:本文的目的是介绍基于软件的决策工具,帮助管理者应对所选工业过程的风险和不确定性。该解决方案得到了理论背景的证实。方法论/方法:该研究基于与流程管理专家的上下文访谈和业务流程建模概念(BPMN)的结合。前者旨在识别具有最高风险暴露的工业过程,后者有利于设计要进行随机模拟的过程。研究结果表明,采用先进的风险分析工具作为模拟方法,可以控制工业过程管理中的风险和不确定性。所提出的解决方案对风险分析师或流程经理很有用。研究局限/启示:纳入随机模拟的过程模型库包括投资、服务提供或经济增值工程等选定过程。正在不断纳入其他进程。论文的原创性/价值:论文提供了工业过程风险管理的解决方案,远远超出了学术领域,为工业从业者提供了有利于过程风险管理的软件工具。类别:技术论文
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
13.30%
发文量
16
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Benchmarking of the e-Learning Quality Assurance in Vocational Education and Training: Project Results Mapping the Accidents and Unsafe Conditions of Workers in the Automotive Sector Developing a Systematic and Practical Road Map for Implementing Quality 4.0 Quality 4.0 in Digital Manufacturing – Example of Good Practice Comparative Analysis of Innovation Districts to Set Up Performance Goals for Tec Innovation District
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1