Aboveground carbon contents and storage of three major Taiwanese conifer species.

Q4 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Taiwan Journal of Forest Science Pub Date : 2009-06-01 DOI:10.7075/TJFS.200906.0091
T. Yen, L. Ai, Chieh-Lu Li, Joou-Shian Lee, Kai Huang
{"title":"Aboveground carbon contents and storage of three major Taiwanese conifer species.","authors":"T. Yen, L. Ai, Chieh-Lu Li, Joou-Shian Lee, Kai Huang","doi":"10.7075/TJFS.200906.0091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research presents estimations of the aboveground carbon storage of 3 major Taiwanese conifer species: Taiwan red cypress (Chamaecyparis formosensis Matsum.), Japanese cedar (Cryptomeria japonica D. Don), and China fir (Cunninghamia lanceolata (Lamb.) Hook.). The percent carbon content (PCC) of the biomass of different tree portions was determined for these species. We found that the PCC was higher in the foliage of all species, while the PCC in other portions of the trees varied with tree species, and the mean PCC of trees increased with the diameter class for both Taiwan red cypress and China fir. At the tree level, using the method based on determining the PCC of different tree portions (the PCC method) and the conventional method (using 50% as the carbon content) to estimate carbon storage of trees revealed significant differences for all species by the t-test for paired comparisons. The conventional method showed higher estimates of carbon storage than the PCC method by 3.96, 1.83 and 0.89% for Taiwan red cypress, Japanese cedar, and China fir, respectively. A allometric models were developed to estimate the carbon storage of the 3 species based on the diameter at breast height (DBH). Moreover, the transformation coefficients between the volume and aboveground carbon storage of trees by a linear regression model were 309.05, 274.33 and 190.34 kg m^(-3) for Taiwan red cypress, Japanese cedar, and China fir, respectively.","PeriodicalId":22180,"journal":{"name":"Taiwan Journal of Forest Science","volume":"26 1","pages":"91-102"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Taiwan Journal of Forest Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7075/TJFS.200906.0091","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

This research presents estimations of the aboveground carbon storage of 3 major Taiwanese conifer species: Taiwan red cypress (Chamaecyparis formosensis Matsum.), Japanese cedar (Cryptomeria japonica D. Don), and China fir (Cunninghamia lanceolata (Lamb.) Hook.). The percent carbon content (PCC) of the biomass of different tree portions was determined for these species. We found that the PCC was higher in the foliage of all species, while the PCC in other portions of the trees varied with tree species, and the mean PCC of trees increased with the diameter class for both Taiwan red cypress and China fir. At the tree level, using the method based on determining the PCC of different tree portions (the PCC method) and the conventional method (using 50% as the carbon content) to estimate carbon storage of trees revealed significant differences for all species by the t-test for paired comparisons. The conventional method showed higher estimates of carbon storage than the PCC method by 3.96, 1.83 and 0.89% for Taiwan red cypress, Japanese cedar, and China fir, respectively. A allometric models were developed to estimate the carbon storage of the 3 species based on the diameter at breast height (DBH). Moreover, the transformation coefficients between the volume and aboveground carbon storage of trees by a linear regression model were 309.05, 274.33 and 190.34 kg m^(-3) for Taiwan red cypress, Japanese cedar, and China fir, respectively.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
台湾三种主要针叶树的地上碳含量与储量。
摘要本文研究台湾3种主要针叶树种:台湾红柏(Chamaecyparis formosensis Matsum.)、日本雪松(Cryptomeria japonica D. Don)和杉木(Cunninghamia lanceolata (Lamb.))的地上碳储量。钩)。测定了这些树种不同部位生物量的百分碳含量(PCC)。结果表明,各树种叶片的PCC均较高,而其他部位的PCC则因树种而异,台湾红柏和杉木的平均PCC均随径级的增加而增加。在树木水平上,采用基于不同树段PCC的估算方法(PCC法)和常规方法(以50%为碳含量)估算树木的碳储量,通过配对比较的t检验发现,所有树种的碳储量差异显著。传统方法估算的台湾红柏、日本雪松和杉木的碳储量分别比PCC方法高3.96、1.83和0.89%。建立了基于胸径(DBH)的异速生长模型来估算3种树种的碳储量。此外,台湾红柏、日本雪松和杉木的碳储量与地上碳储量之间的转换系数分别为309.05、274.33和190.34 kg m^(-3)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Taiwan Journal of Forest Science
Taiwan Journal of Forest Science Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Forestry
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Taiwan Journal of Forest Science is an academic publication that welcomes contributions from around the world. The journal covers all aspects of forest research, both basic and applied, including Forest Biology and Ecology (tree breeding, silviculture, soils, etc.), Forest Management (watershed management, forest pests and diseases, forest fire, wildlife, recreation, etc.), Biotechnology, and Wood Science. Manuscripts acceptable to the journal include (1) research papers, (2) research notes, (3) review articles, and (4) monographs. A research note differs from a research paper in its scope which is less-comprehensive, yet it contains important information. In other words, a research note offers an innovative perspective or new discovery which is worthy of early disclosure.
期刊最新文献
Pinus sylvestris Can Form Ectomycorrhiza with Phialocephala fortinii Carbon Storage and Density of Forest Ecosystems in Heilongjiang Province, China Building allometric models to estimate above-ground and below-ground biomass of mahogany sapling. Effects of Soil Properties on Restoring Indigenous Plants in Coral Reef Landscapes Response variations of Alnus subcordata (L.), Populus deltoides (Bartr. ex Marsh.), and Taxodium distichum (L.) seedlings to flooding stress.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1