Challenging Democracy: Singapore’s Increasing Rejection of Democratic Values

IF 0.9 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice Pub Date : 2022-08-31 DOI:10.47611/jsrhs.v11i3.3690
Arya Kumar
{"title":"Challenging Democracy: Singapore’s Increasing Rejection of Democratic Values","authors":"Arya Kumar","doi":"10.47611/jsrhs.v11i3.3690","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Singapore is a relatively young country that earned its independence from Malaysia in 1965, yet this developing democracy has achieved a remarkable GDP per capita that in 2019 was higher than the US’s. Fostering economic growth has been a top priority for the country’s dominant political party, the People’s Action Party (PAP) who has controlled the country’s executive branch since 1959. However, in order to remain the dominant political party, the PAP has compromised the country’s democratic institutions and the people’s civil liberties. In the general parliamentary elections, the PAP has increased the usage and severity of electoral manipulation tactics in order to ensure elections in their favor. Not only have they eroded the legitimacy of elections, but they have also repeatedly abused control of the judicial branch to push for decisions that suppressed opposition parties and protected PAP leaders. Lastly, the PAP, in order to suppress the spread of anti-PAP sentiment, has shut down news websites, jailed journalists, and threatened the livelihood of anybody who criticizes the PAP, contradicting constitutional civil liberties. The People’s Action Party has brought a number of economic benefits to Singapore, yet economic growth has come at the expense of the liberal democracy, trending Singapore in the direction of autocracy and challenging the notion that democracy is the only path for a developing nation’s success.","PeriodicalId":46753,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice","volume":"130 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v11i3.3690","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Singapore is a relatively young country that earned its independence from Malaysia in 1965, yet this developing democracy has achieved a remarkable GDP per capita that in 2019 was higher than the US’s. Fostering economic growth has been a top priority for the country’s dominant political party, the People’s Action Party (PAP) who has controlled the country’s executive branch since 1959. However, in order to remain the dominant political party, the PAP has compromised the country’s democratic institutions and the people’s civil liberties. In the general parliamentary elections, the PAP has increased the usage and severity of electoral manipulation tactics in order to ensure elections in their favor. Not only have they eroded the legitimacy of elections, but they have also repeatedly abused control of the judicial branch to push for decisions that suppressed opposition parties and protected PAP leaders. Lastly, the PAP, in order to suppress the spread of anti-PAP sentiment, has shut down news websites, jailed journalists, and threatened the livelihood of anybody who criticizes the PAP, contradicting constitutional civil liberties. The People’s Action Party has brought a number of economic benefits to Singapore, yet economic growth has come at the expense of the liberal democracy, trending Singapore in the direction of autocracy and challenging the notion that democracy is the only path for a developing nation’s success.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
挑战民主:新加坡对民主价值观的日益排斥
新加坡是一个相对年轻的国家,1965年从马来西亚独立出来,但这个发展中的民主国家取得了令人瞩目的人均GDP,在2019年超过了美国。促进经济增长一直是该国主要政党人民行动党(PAP)的首要任务。人民行动党自1959年以来一直控制着该国的行政部门。然而,为了保持主导地位,人民行动党损害了国家的民主制度和人民的公民自由。在议会大选中,人民行动党增加了选举操纵策略的使用和严重程度,以确保选举对他们有利。他们不仅侵蚀了选举的合法性,而且还一再滥用对司法部门的控制,推动压制反对党和保护人民行动党领导人的决定。最后,人民行动党为了压制反人民行动党情绪的蔓延,关闭了新闻网站,监禁了记者,并威胁任何批评人民行动党的人的生计,这违背了宪法的公民自由。人民行动党给新加坡带来了许多经济利益,但经济增长是以牺牲自由民主为代价的,将新加坡推向专制的方向,挑战了民主是发展中国家成功的唯一道路的观念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice
Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: The vision of the Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice (JSARP) is to publish the most rigorous, relevant, and well-respected research and practice making a difference in student affairs practice. JSARP especially encourages manuscripts that are unconventional in nature and that engage in methodological and epistemological extensions that transcend the boundaries of traditional research inquiries.
期刊最新文献
How White Undergraduates Experience and Make Meaning of Parental Messages about Race The Overlooked Influence of Advising and Supporting Upon Leadership in Student Affairs Delivering on the Promise of High-Impact Practices: Research and Models for Achieving Equity, Fidelity, Impact, and Scale LGBTQ Leadership in Higher Education How Sorority and Fraternity Life Professionals Validate Culturally Based Sororities and Fraternities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1