What is the Problem Represented to be in the Group of Four’s Policy on Reform of the United Nations Security Council? – An Argument for Clarity Towards the Global South

IF 0.1 Q4 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Majalah Kedokteran Bandung-MKB-Bandung Medical Journal Pub Date : 2022-10-27 DOI:10.1163/21983534-09030004
Bjarke Zinck Winther
{"title":"What is the Problem Represented to be in the Group of Four’s Policy on Reform of the United Nations Security Council? – An Argument for Clarity Towards the Global South","authors":"Bjarke Zinck Winther","doi":"10.1163/21983534-09030004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThis article applies a critical policy analysis to the United Nations Security Council (unsc) reform policy from the Group of Four (G4), to suggest ways for the G4 to clarify its policy’s impact and opportunities for Global South countries. The coalition comprises Brazil, Germany, India, and Japan. Based on an analysis of a dataset that includes official reform proposals, press statements, meetings statements, meetings notes, and interviews with key actors, the article concludes with five policy directions that can make the G4’s reform policy clear, transparent, and subsequently successful in terms of the necessary appeal and ensuing support from Global South countries. The article relies on a conceptual and methodological differentiation between how the absent unsc reform problem is presented and represented, respectively. A focus on the representation, which mainly refers to the policy’s subtle and implicit strategies and consequences, allows for the following overall contributions to unsc reform studies. First, I point out how the policy promotes and opposes democracy, equality, and increased Global South influence. Second, the analysis guides the G4 strategy and unsc reform strategies, at large, towards emphases on the African Union’s reform position.","PeriodicalId":40791,"journal":{"name":"Majalah Kedokteran Bandung-MKB-Bandung Medical Journal","volume":"66 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Majalah Kedokteran Bandung-MKB-Bandung Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/21983534-09030004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article applies a critical policy analysis to the United Nations Security Council (unsc) reform policy from the Group of Four (G4), to suggest ways for the G4 to clarify its policy’s impact and opportunities for Global South countries. The coalition comprises Brazil, Germany, India, and Japan. Based on an analysis of a dataset that includes official reform proposals, press statements, meetings statements, meetings notes, and interviews with key actors, the article concludes with five policy directions that can make the G4’s reform policy clear, transparent, and subsequently successful in terms of the necessary appeal and ensuing support from Global South countries. The article relies on a conceptual and methodological differentiation between how the absent unsc reform problem is presented and represented, respectively. A focus on the representation, which mainly refers to the policy’s subtle and implicit strategies and consequences, allows for the following overall contributions to unsc reform studies. First, I point out how the policy promotes and opposes democracy, equality, and increased Global South influence. Second, the analysis guides the G4 strategy and unsc reform strategies, at large, towards emphases on the African Union’s reform position.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
四国集团关于联合国安理会改革的政策所代表的问题是什么?-对全球南方的明确论证
本文对四国集团(G4)的联合国安理会(unsc)改革政策进行了批判性的政策分析,为四国集团阐明其政策对全球南方国家的影响和机遇提出了建议。该联盟包括巴西、德国、印度和日本。基于对包括官方改革提案、新闻声明、会议声明、会议纪要和对主要参与者的采访在内的数据集的分析,本文总结了五个政策方向,这些方向可以使四国集团的改革政策清晰、透明,并在必要的呼吁和随后的全球南方国家支持方面取得成功。本文依赖于对缺席的联合国安理会改革问题如何分别提出和表述的概念和方法上的区别。对代表性的关注,主要是指政策的微妙和隐含的战略和后果,允许以下对联合国安理会改革研究的总体贡献。首先,我指出这一政策是如何促进和反对民主、平等以及增加全球南方影响力的。其次,该分析总体上引导G4战略和联合国安理会改革战略朝着强调非盟改革立场的方向发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Therapeutic Outcome of High Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC) for Severe COVID-19 Patients in Isolation Intensive Care Unit Diagnostic Challenge of Adult-onset Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus in a Remote Hospital Effective Visual Media to Increase Knowledge and Comprehension of Multidrug Resistant Tuberculosis Among Patients and Their Caregivers Drug Interactions in Diabetic Ulcer Patients in an Indonesian Private Hospital Effectiveness of WHO Stress Management for Improving Insomnia Severity Index Score in Telegram’s Self-Isolated Online Group Population
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1