Marketing opportunities and challenges for locally raised meats: An online consumer survey in South Carolina

IF 1.6 Q2 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY Journal of Agriculture Food Systems and Community Development Pub Date : 2023-03-13 DOI:10.5304/jafscd.2023.122.009
Steven T. Richards, M. Vassalos
{"title":"Marketing opportunities and challenges for locally raised meats: An online consumer survey in South Carolina","authors":"Steven T. Richards, M. Vassalos","doi":"10.5304/jafscd.2023.122.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"South Carolina livestock producers are expanding their operations to include local meat sales, with a sizeable number of farmers entering the market for the first time. Little is known about South Caro­lina’s local meat consumers and their buying pref­er­ences. This study aims to identify the demo­graphic traits of local meat consumers, their pre­ferred local meat product attributes, their desired purchasing locations, and a range of prices con­sumers are willing to pay for local meat. This study surveyed 1,048 South Carolina meat consumers. Of these survey respondents, 741 had consumed local meat products within the last 12 months and 307 had not. Results indicate that local meat consumers tend to be younger, reside in larger households, have higher household incomes, and have greater educational attainment. They also may be more likely to be long-term residents of South Carolina. These consumers are willing to pay a 1% to 24% premium for local meats to be eaten at home and US$1.00 to US$1.99 more per entrée for local meats at a restaurant. The most desirable attributes of local meat are hormone-free, all-natural, no anti­biotics, and grass-fed. The most popular buying locations are the grocery store, directly from farms, farmers markets, butcher shops, and online order­ing. Most consumers are unwilling to drive more than 20 miles (32 km) to purchase local meat. The study also uncovered barriers to consumers’ will­ingness to purchase (or purchase more) local meats: product unavailability, high prices, food safety concerns, convenience, and ease of prepara­tion.","PeriodicalId":51829,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agriculture Food Systems and Community Development","volume":"48 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agriculture Food Systems and Community Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5304/jafscd.2023.122.009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

South Carolina livestock producers are expanding their operations to include local meat sales, with a sizeable number of farmers entering the market for the first time. Little is known about South Caro­lina’s local meat consumers and their buying pref­er­ences. This study aims to identify the demo­graphic traits of local meat consumers, their pre­ferred local meat product attributes, their desired purchasing locations, and a range of prices con­sumers are willing to pay for local meat. This study surveyed 1,048 South Carolina meat consumers. Of these survey respondents, 741 had consumed local meat products within the last 12 months and 307 had not. Results indicate that local meat consumers tend to be younger, reside in larger households, have higher household incomes, and have greater educational attainment. They also may be more likely to be long-term residents of South Carolina. These consumers are willing to pay a 1% to 24% premium for local meats to be eaten at home and US$1.00 to US$1.99 more per entrée for local meats at a restaurant. The most desirable attributes of local meat are hormone-free, all-natural, no anti­biotics, and grass-fed. The most popular buying locations are the grocery store, directly from farms, farmers markets, butcher shops, and online order­ing. Most consumers are unwilling to drive more than 20 miles (32 km) to purchase local meat. The study also uncovered barriers to consumers’ will­ingness to purchase (or purchase more) local meats: product unavailability, high prices, food safety concerns, convenience, and ease of prepara­tion.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
本地饲养肉类的营销机会和挑战:南卡罗来纳州的一项在线消费者调查
南卡罗来纳的牲畜生产商正在扩大他们的业务,包括当地的肉类销售,相当多的农民首次进入市场。人们对南卡罗来纳当地的肉类消费者及其购买偏好知之甚少。本研究旨在确定当地肉类消费者的人口统计学特征,他们偏爱的当地肉类产品属性,他们期望的购买地点,以及消费者愿意为当地肉类支付的价格范围。这项研究调查了1048名南卡罗来纳州的肉类消费者。在这些受访者中,741人在过去12个月内曾食用本地肉类产品,307人则没有。结果表明,当地肉类消费者往往更年轻,居住在大家庭中,家庭收入更高,受教育程度更高。他们也更有可能是南卡罗来纳州的长期居民。这些消费者愿意多花1%至24%的价格购买本地肉类在家食用,并愿意在餐馆多花1至1.99美元购买本地肉类。本地肉类最理想的特性是无激素,全天然,无抗生素,草饲。最受欢迎的购买地点是杂货店,直接从农场、农贸市场、肉店和网上订购。大多数消费者不愿意开车超过20英里(32公里)去购买当地的肉类。该研究还揭示了消费者购买(或购买更多)本地肉类的意愿障碍:产品不可得、价格高、食品安全问题、方便和易于准备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
12.50%
发文量
73
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Disparities in COVID-19 vaccine uptake, attitudes, and experiences between food system and non-food system essential workers. Engaging, empowering, and evaluating farm-to-school projects with photovoice Appetizers in development economics Nourishing hope: Unraveling the path to justice in the global food system Treatment of racism and social injustice in addressing complex topics: What we learned
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1