FROM POETRY TO SCIENCE OR FROM RULES TO THEORY

Q2 Social Sciences Praxema Pub Date : 2023-02-28 DOI:10.23951/2312-7899-2023-2-95-102
Александр Владимирович Болдачёв
{"title":"FROM POETRY TO SCIENCE OR FROM RULES TO THEORY","authors":"Александр Владимирович Болдачёв","doi":"10.23951/2312-7899-2023-2-95-102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Развиваются два тезиса: (1) наука – это одна из форм или сфер познания, наравне с искусством, философией, религией, математикой, мистикой; (2) определить, что такое наука, можно только проведением границ между перечисленными формами познания. Констатируется, что различия между познавательными сферами не определяются ни при обращении к истории их формирования, ни на уровне их связи с языком, – все они используют язык как основной инструмент фиксации результатов познания. Базовыми же критериями, обеспечивающими относительно строгое проведение границ между наукой и другими познавательными сферами, являются специфика предмета познания (воспроизводимый или уникальный) и структура текста, в котором фиксируется результат познания (рациональный или иррациональный).\n Cognition is an activity that ensures adaptation and better orientation of a person in the world. The result of cognitive activity is not a specific consumer product or service, but behavioral scenarios (usually recorded in the form of texts) that generally increase human survivability in the world. Cognitive activities are primarily distinguished by their subjects: aesthetic perception (art), unified forms of thinking (philosophy), universal values (religion), explicit structural unity (mathematics), and implicit unity of the world (mysticism). The subject of scientific cognition should be recognized not just as abstract reality, but as unequivocally reproducible phenomena, regardless of their ontological status. And this decision undoubtedly corresponds to the general scientific representations of the reproducibility of experiments and the possibility of recording the regularities revealed in them in the form of rational sign systems (formulas and theories). The main contribution of philosophy to the development of science lies not in “word creation”, not in introducing new concepts (being, cosmos, nature, infinity, logos, etc.), but in using these new concepts to construct complex, internally consistent structures that, when recorded in text, are called theories. Science as an independent cognitive activity formed when it had combined two linguistic practices, two text forms of knowledge representation: (1) empirical statements about uniquely reproducible phenomena and (2) theoretical statements, logically derived within a sign system that describes those phenomena in scientific terms. It is essential to note that neither empirical statements, such as experimentally obtained ones, nor theory conclusions are scientific in and of themselves. They only become scientific when the results of observations match the logical/mathematical conclusions of the theory. Science is a cognitive activity whose subject is uniquely reproducible phenomena and whose result is theories whose logical conclusions must be confirmed by empirical data. Disciplines such as religion, art, philosophy, mysticism are not sciences because their subjects are not reproducible. Mathematics as a whole cannot be considered a science because its subject, although reproducible, is inseparable from the discipline itself, that is, there is no clear separation of theoretical and empirical statements in it.","PeriodicalId":37342,"journal":{"name":"Praxema","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Praxema","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23951/2312-7899-2023-2-95-102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Развиваются два тезиса: (1) наука – это одна из форм или сфер познания, наравне с искусством, философией, религией, математикой, мистикой; (2) определить, что такое наука, можно только проведением границ между перечисленными формами познания. Констатируется, что различия между познавательными сферами не определяются ни при обращении к истории их формирования, ни на уровне их связи с языком, – все они используют язык как основной инструмент фиксации результатов познания. Базовыми же критериями, обеспечивающими относительно строгое проведение границ между наукой и другими познавательными сферами, являются специфика предмета познания (воспроизводимый или уникальный) и структура текста, в котором фиксируется результат познания (рациональный или иррациональный). Cognition is an activity that ensures adaptation and better orientation of a person in the world. The result of cognitive activity is not a specific consumer product or service, but behavioral scenarios (usually recorded in the form of texts) that generally increase human survivability in the world. Cognitive activities are primarily distinguished by their subjects: aesthetic perception (art), unified forms of thinking (philosophy), universal values (religion), explicit structural unity (mathematics), and implicit unity of the world (mysticism). The subject of scientific cognition should be recognized not just as abstract reality, but as unequivocally reproducible phenomena, regardless of their ontological status. And this decision undoubtedly corresponds to the general scientific representations of the reproducibility of experiments and the possibility of recording the regularities revealed in them in the form of rational sign systems (formulas and theories). The main contribution of philosophy to the development of science lies not in “word creation”, not in introducing new concepts (being, cosmos, nature, infinity, logos, etc.), but in using these new concepts to construct complex, internally consistent structures that, when recorded in text, are called theories. Science as an independent cognitive activity formed when it had combined two linguistic practices, two text forms of knowledge representation: (1) empirical statements about uniquely reproducible phenomena and (2) theoretical statements, logically derived within a sign system that describes those phenomena in scientific terms. It is essential to note that neither empirical statements, such as experimentally obtained ones, nor theory conclusions are scientific in and of themselves. They only become scientific when the results of observations match the logical/mathematical conclusions of the theory. Science is a cognitive activity whose subject is uniquely reproducible phenomena and whose result is theories whose logical conclusions must be confirmed by empirical data. Disciplines such as religion, art, philosophy, mysticism are not sciences because their subjects are not reproducible. Mathematics as a whole cannot be considered a science because its subject, although reproducible, is inseparable from the discipline itself, that is, there is no clear separation of theoretical and empirical statements in it.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从诗歌到科学,从规则到理论
科学是知识的一种形式或领域,类似于艺术、哲学、宗教、数学、神秘;(2)定义科学的唯一方法就是在这些知识形式之间划清界限。人们注意到,认知领域之间的区别既不是通过讲述它们的历史,也不是通过它们与语言的联系来定义的,它们都使用语言作为固定学习结果的主要工具。科学和其他认知领域之间的界限相对严格的基本标准是知识对象(可复制或独特)的特征和文本结构,记录知识的结果(理性或非理性)。在这个世界上,一个人的行为是积极的,是积极的。这是一种特殊的协作或服务,但比哈维奥拉斯(在德州的形式)是人类在世界上生存的记录。《宇宙行动》(art)、《宇宙遗产》(mathematics)、《世界不朽》(mysticism)。《科学共生》应该是《超越现实》,但它应该是《超越现实》,《超越现实》。这是对传统科学重新创造的挑战,也是对传统符号系统形式的重新创造的挑战。《科学发明》的主要内容不是“创造”,不是“创造”,不是“创造”,而是“创造”。当这两种语言互换时,两种语言互换形式(1)、两种不同的语言形式(2))。这是一种自然的感觉,一种超越的感觉,一种超越的感觉,一种超越的感觉。这是一场科学竞赛,是一场科学竞赛,是一场科学竞赛。科学是一种对等功能,这是一种uniquely复原功能,而whose复原是一种感觉。分裂的信仰,艺术,philosophy,神秘的不是科学,不是还原的。Mathematics就像一个被称为“科学”的人,“although reducabect”,是来自分裂的itself的inseparal。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Praxema
Praxema Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
“MIRAGES” AND THE “REALITY” OF VISUALIZATION IN THE CONTEMPORARY EDUCATIONAL PROCESS VIRTUAL AND “REAL” WORLDS: THE PROBLEM OF CORRELATION AND PERCEPTION SEMIOTIC WORLDS. PLANTS EDUCATION DIGITALIZATION ASTIGMATISM: PROBLEM SETTING FOR SEMIOTIC DIAGNOSTICS OF CONSEQUENCES VISUALIZATION OF SPACE IN GEOPOLITICS: TO THE PROBLEM OF THE EVOLUTION OF THE METHOD
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1