Patient Safety Competence and Attitude towards Patient Safety Policies among students Nurses in Kerala: A Cross-sectional Survey

Namitha Subrahmanyam, Isha M Aboobacker, S. Mathai
{"title":"Patient Safety Competence and Attitude towards Patient Safety Policies among students Nurses in Kerala: A Cross-sectional Survey","authors":"Namitha Subrahmanyam, Isha M Aboobacker, S. Mathai","doi":"10.52711/2349-2996.2022.00095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The provision of safer and higher quality care is emphasized for nursing professionals. The purpose of this study was to identify the attitude towards patient safety policies among nursing students, to find the association of patient safety competence score with selected variables of students and to compare the patient safety competence of nursing students in classroom and clinical setting. Methods: A descriptive study was conducted among two self financing colleges of Kerala. 332nursing students aged between 16 to 22 years were selected by convenient sampling technique. Health Professional Education in Patient Safety Survey (H-PEPSS) was used to collect data on patient safety competence. Attitude towards patient safety policy was measured using structured attitude scale on patient safety policies. Results: Student nurses’ theoretical competence patient safety was significantly higher 22(18,25) (p<0.001) than clinical competence 21(17,24). Hospital incident report was considered as the final step for correction of error by 78.61% of the respondents and only (29.52%) agreed with the statements expressing a view that non- punitive response to error is crucial to overall patient safety. Theoretical competence on patient safety was associated with course of study (p=0.007) and year of study (p=0.007) whereas year of study (p=0.041) and clinical experience provided in the course (p=0.004) were the significant factors associated with clinical competence on patient safety among student nurses. Conclusion: The findings showed that significant lacunae exist between clinical and theory competence with regard to patient safety among nursing students. The perception on safety communication and reporting also varied among different dimensions. This findings suggest a need to sensitize students regarding patient safety policies.","PeriodicalId":72313,"journal":{"name":"Asian journal of nursing education and research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian journal of nursing education and research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52711/2349-2996.2022.00095","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The provision of safer and higher quality care is emphasized for nursing professionals. The purpose of this study was to identify the attitude towards patient safety policies among nursing students, to find the association of patient safety competence score with selected variables of students and to compare the patient safety competence of nursing students in classroom and clinical setting. Methods: A descriptive study was conducted among two self financing colleges of Kerala. 332nursing students aged between 16 to 22 years were selected by convenient sampling technique. Health Professional Education in Patient Safety Survey (H-PEPSS) was used to collect data on patient safety competence. Attitude towards patient safety policy was measured using structured attitude scale on patient safety policies. Results: Student nurses’ theoretical competence patient safety was significantly higher 22(18,25) (p<0.001) than clinical competence 21(17,24). Hospital incident report was considered as the final step for correction of error by 78.61% of the respondents and only (29.52%) agreed with the statements expressing a view that non- punitive response to error is crucial to overall patient safety. Theoretical competence on patient safety was associated with course of study (p=0.007) and year of study (p=0.007) whereas year of study (p=0.041) and clinical experience provided in the course (p=0.004) were the significant factors associated with clinical competence on patient safety among student nurses. Conclusion: The findings showed that significant lacunae exist between clinical and theory competence with regard to patient safety among nursing students. The perception on safety communication and reporting also varied among different dimensions. This findings suggest a need to sensitize students regarding patient safety policies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
喀拉拉邦学生护士的患者安全能力和对患者安全政策的态度:一项横断面调查
介绍:提供更安全和更高质量的护理是强调护理专业人员。摘要本研究旨在了解护生对患者安全政策的态度、患者安全能力得分与学生所选变量的关系,并比较护生在课堂与临床环境中的患者安全能力。方法:对喀拉拉邦两所自费学院进行描述性研究,采用方便抽样方法抽取16 ~ 22岁的护理专业学生332人。采用卫生专业教育患者安全调查(H-PEPSS)收集患者安全能力数据。采用结构化患者安全政策态度量表测量患者对患者安全政策的态度。结果:实习护士的理论能力22(18,25)显著高于临床能力21(17,24)(p<0.001)。78.61%的受访者认为医院事件报告是纠正错误的最后一步,只有29.52%的受访者同意对错误的非惩罚性反应对患者整体安全至关重要的说法。患者安全理论能力与学习课程(p=0.007)和学习年份(p=0.007)相关,而学习年份(p=0.041)和课程所提供的临床经验(p=0.004)是与学生护士患者安全临床能力相关的显著因素。结论:护生对患者安全的临床能力与理论能力存在明显差距。对安全沟通和报告的认知在不同维度之间也存在差异。这一发现表明,有必要提高学生对患者安全政策的敏感性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Study to assess the Knowledge and Attitude of women regarding MCH services in selected Urban and Rural areas, Rajahmundry Stigma and Discrimination of family care giver's (FCG) – A Barrier in mental illness: Scoping Review Knowledge on Urinary Tract Infection among the adolescent girls of age group of 13-16 years in Carmel School, Digboi, Tinsukia, Assam Domains of Empowerment among Nursing students Stigmatizing attitude of Nursing students towards patients with Mental Illness
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1