Thoracoscopic decortication for stage III empyema; a minimal invasive approach in a delayed presentation disease

Hussein Elkhayat , Mahmoud Sallam , Maiada Kamal , Esam M. Abdalla
{"title":"Thoracoscopic decortication for stage III empyema; a minimal invasive approach in a delayed presentation disease","authors":"Hussein Elkhayat ,&nbsp;Mahmoud Sallam ,&nbsp;Maiada Kamal ,&nbsp;Esam M. Abdalla","doi":"10.1016/j.jescts.2018.10.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Stage III empyema still a problem that thoracic surgeons should deal with. We try to reduce the postoperative pain and hospital stay for those patients with using a minimal invasive approach in every case.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Prospective study of all cases assigned for one surgeon with diagnosis of turbid and/or hemorrhagic pleural effusion that showed loculations with thick peal or failed simple chest tube drainage admitted to our thoracic surgery service. An informed consent was taken of a trial for thoracoscopic procedure (VATS) with the possibility of open surgery in case that thoracoscopy fail to proceed. Operative technique was to completely remove the fibrous peel at the surface of the lung without parietal decortication.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Forty-seven patients who met the inclusion criteria were assigned for the study, 38 males and 9 females. Mean age was 45.32 (17-82 years). Twenty-eight cases need only drainage and debridement with lysis of fine adhesions without the need for visceral decortication. The remaining 19 cases were subjected to VATS decortication. Of the 19 cases of decortication, 2 cases (10.52%) need conversion to open thoracotomy and one case converted from uniportal to 2 ports approach. All cases of decorication were discharged with mean drainage days of 5.42 (2-30 days). Mean operative time for decortication cases was 116.68 min (86-140 min).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Stage III empyema is no longer an absolute contraindication for VATS with the fact that not all cases with a preoperative diagnosis of stage III empyema might need decortication. Moreover, VATS decortication is feasible with a reasonable operative time, short hospital stay and no mortality compared to historical control.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100843,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Egyptian Society of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery","volume":"26 4","pages":"Pages 301-307"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jescts.2018.10.003","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Egyptian Society of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110578X1830155X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background

Stage III empyema still a problem that thoracic surgeons should deal with. We try to reduce the postoperative pain and hospital stay for those patients with using a minimal invasive approach in every case.

Methods

Prospective study of all cases assigned for one surgeon with diagnosis of turbid and/or hemorrhagic pleural effusion that showed loculations with thick peal or failed simple chest tube drainage admitted to our thoracic surgery service. An informed consent was taken of a trial for thoracoscopic procedure (VATS) with the possibility of open surgery in case that thoracoscopy fail to proceed. Operative technique was to completely remove the fibrous peel at the surface of the lung without parietal decortication.

Results

Forty-seven patients who met the inclusion criteria were assigned for the study, 38 males and 9 females. Mean age was 45.32 (17-82 years). Twenty-eight cases need only drainage and debridement with lysis of fine adhesions without the need for visceral decortication. The remaining 19 cases were subjected to VATS decortication. Of the 19 cases of decortication, 2 cases (10.52%) need conversion to open thoracotomy and one case converted from uniportal to 2 ports approach. All cases of decorication were discharged with mean drainage days of 5.42 (2-30 days). Mean operative time for decortication cases was 116.68 min (86-140 min).

Conclusions

Stage III empyema is no longer an absolute contraindication for VATS with the fact that not all cases with a preoperative diagnosis of stage III empyema might need decortication. Moreover, VATS decortication is feasible with a reasonable operative time, short hospital stay and no mortality compared to historical control.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胸腔镜下III期脓胸去皮术;一种微创入路治疗迟发性疾病
背景:III期脓胸仍然是胸外科医生应该处理的问题。我们尽量减少患者术后疼痛和住院时间,在任何情况下使用微创入路。方法前瞻性研究分配给一名外科医生的所有病例,诊断为混浊和/或出血性胸腔积液,显示有厚瓣的位置或简单胸管引流失败。对胸腔镜手术(VATS)的试验进行了知情同意,如果胸腔镜手术失败,可能会进行开放手术。手术技术是完全去除肺表面的纤维皮,而不去顶剥。结果符合纳入标准的患者47例,男38例,女9例。平均年龄45.32岁(17 ~ 82岁)。28例只需要引流和清创,细粘连溶解,无需内脏去皮。其余19例行VATS去皮术。19例脱屑患者中2例(10.52%)需转开胸,1例由单门入路转双门入路。所有病例均顺利出院,平均引流天数5.42天(2 ~ 30天)。去皮术平均手术时间116.68 min (86 ~ 140 min)。结论III期脓肿不再是VATS的绝对禁忌症,并非所有术前诊断为III期脓肿的病例都需要去皮。与历史对照组相比,VATS去皮术可行,手术时间合理,住院时间短,无死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
WITHDRAWN: Early outcome of minimally invasive mitral valve surgery Thoracoscopic decortication for stage III empyema; a minimal invasive approach in a delayed presentation disease Surgical management of congenital lobar emphysema: A 15 years experience in a tertiary thoracic surgery unit Outcome of pump assisted beating mitral valve replacement in patients with chronic severe mitral regurgitation and left ventricular dysfunction. A clinical randomized trial Histopathological changes of right ventricle outflow tract myocardium in relation to age in tetralogy of Fallot and its relation to clinical outcome
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1