What Drives the Heterogeneity in Portfolio Choice? The Role of Institutional, Traditional, and Behavioral Factors

Markku Kaustia, Andrew Conlin, N. Luotonen
{"title":"What Drives the Heterogeneity in Portfolio Choice? The Role of Institutional, Traditional, and Behavioral Factors","authors":"Markku Kaustia, Andrew Conlin, N. Luotonen","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2845963","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We analyze stock market participation in 19 European countries over 2004-2013, jointly controlling for all relevant variables from prior literature. Previous work relies on a subset of these factors, and often lacks good risk aversion proxies. Our full model explains 30% of the variation in the participation decision. Institutional factors captured by country fixed effects contribute 9.5 percentage points; traditional individual-level factors, such as risk aversion and income, contribute 15 pp; recently identified factors, such as trust and health, contribute 5.5 pp. Most new factors offer little help explaining non-participation at the high end – among the wealthy and well-educated. We present evidence challenging and complementing existing interpretations of factors such as IQ, sociability, and trust. We suggest a hierarchical framework for thinking about effects in the high versus low end.","PeriodicalId":10477,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Social Science eJournal","volume":"61 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Social Science eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2845963","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

We analyze stock market participation in 19 European countries over 2004-2013, jointly controlling for all relevant variables from prior literature. Previous work relies on a subset of these factors, and often lacks good risk aversion proxies. Our full model explains 30% of the variation in the participation decision. Institutional factors captured by country fixed effects contribute 9.5 percentage points; traditional individual-level factors, such as risk aversion and income, contribute 15 pp; recently identified factors, such as trust and health, contribute 5.5 pp. Most new factors offer little help explaining non-participation at the high end – among the wealthy and well-educated. We present evidence challenging and complementing existing interpretations of factors such as IQ, sociability, and trust. We suggest a hierarchical framework for thinking about effects in the high versus low end.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
是什么驱动了投资组合选择的异质性?制度、传统和行为因素的作用
我们分析了2004-2013年19个欧洲国家的股票市场参与度,共同控制了先前文献中的所有相关变量。以前的工作依赖于这些因素的一个子集,往往缺乏良好的风险规避代理。我们的完整模型解释了参与决策中30%的变化。国家固定效应所包含的制度因素贡献了9.5个百分点;传统的个人层面因素,如风险规避和收入,贡献了15个百分点;最近确定的因素,如信任和健康,贡献了5.5个百分点。大多数新因素对解释高端人群(富裕和受过良好教育的人群)的不参与几乎没有帮助。我们提出的证据挑战和补充现有的因素,如智商,社交能力和信任的解释。我们提出了一个层次框架来思考在高端和低端的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Cost of Overconfidence in Public Information The Compliance Consequences of Fault Assignment in Sanctions Examining the Link Between Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Work Performance of Employees in the Private Schools, Mediated by Workplace Environment An Ordinal Theory of Risk and Correlation Aversion Persuasion Under Costly Learning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1