Border Measures of Trademark Enforcement in Pakistan: A Comparative Analysis with Malaysia and USA

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Health Economics Policy and Law Pub Date : 2022-12-06 DOI:10.22158/elp.v5n2p55
Sohaib Mukhtar, Zinatul Ashiqin Zainol, Sufian Jusoh
{"title":"Border Measures of Trademark Enforcement in Pakistan: A Comparative Analysis with Malaysia and USA","authors":"Sohaib Mukhtar, Zinatul Ashiqin Zainol, Sufian Jusoh","doi":"10.22158/elp.v5n2p55","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Border measures of trademark enforcement is an administrative method required to be implemented through executive and administrative customs authority of Pakistan, Malaysia and United States of America (USA). Border measures of trademark enforcement runs under Customs Act 1969 and Trade Marks Ordinance 2001 in Pakistan, under Customs Act 1967 and Trade Descriptions Act 2011 in Malaysia and under Tariff Act 1930 and Lanham Trademark Act 1946 in USA. Trademark is name, mark, smell, sign, or a sound distinguishes services and goods of one undertaking from services and goods or other undertakings, it is required to be non-descriptive, distinctive and losses its distinctiveness when registered owner of trademark does not take prompt and speedy action against its infringement. The registered owner of trademark may avail administrative, civil, criminal procedures, provisional and border measure for protection of his registered trademark. Border measure is required to be adopted by registered trademark owner when there is likelihood of exportation and importation of suspected infringed goods which contains suspected identical infringed trademark. This article is qualitative method of research as it focusses on comparative analysis of border measures of trademark enforcement in Pakistan, Malaysia and USA. The purpose of border measure is to prevent importation and exportation of infringed goods through administrative customs authority on its own or on application and complaint of registered trademark owner. After comparative analysis of border measure of trademark enforcement in Pakistan, Malaysia and USA, it is found that the owner of registered trademark should be required to furnish his details and details of his registered trademark and prescribed goods or services before administrative customs authority immediately after registration, thereupon the customs authority would promptly act on importation and exportation of counterfeiting trademark goods.","PeriodicalId":46836,"journal":{"name":"Health Economics Policy and Law","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Economics Policy and Law","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22158/elp.v5n2p55","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Border measures of trademark enforcement is an administrative method required to be implemented through executive and administrative customs authority of Pakistan, Malaysia and United States of America (USA). Border measures of trademark enforcement runs under Customs Act 1969 and Trade Marks Ordinance 2001 in Pakistan, under Customs Act 1967 and Trade Descriptions Act 2011 in Malaysia and under Tariff Act 1930 and Lanham Trademark Act 1946 in USA. Trademark is name, mark, smell, sign, or a sound distinguishes services and goods of one undertaking from services and goods or other undertakings, it is required to be non-descriptive, distinctive and losses its distinctiveness when registered owner of trademark does not take prompt and speedy action against its infringement. The registered owner of trademark may avail administrative, civil, criminal procedures, provisional and border measure for protection of his registered trademark. Border measure is required to be adopted by registered trademark owner when there is likelihood of exportation and importation of suspected infringed goods which contains suspected identical infringed trademark. This article is qualitative method of research as it focusses on comparative analysis of border measures of trademark enforcement in Pakistan, Malaysia and USA. The purpose of border measure is to prevent importation and exportation of infringed goods through administrative customs authority on its own or on application and complaint of registered trademark owner. After comparative analysis of border measure of trademark enforcement in Pakistan, Malaysia and USA, it is found that the owner of registered trademark should be required to furnish his details and details of his registered trademark and prescribed goods or services before administrative customs authority immediately after registration, thereupon the customs authority would promptly act on importation and exportation of counterfeiting trademark goods.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴基斯坦商标执法的边境措施:与马来西亚和美国的比较分析
商标边境执法措施是巴基斯坦、马来西亚和美利坚合众国(美国)的行政和行政海关当局要求实施的一种行政方法。巴基斯坦根据1969年海关法和2001年商标条例,马来西亚根据1967年海关法和2011年商品说明法,美国根据1930年关税法和1946年兰哈姆商标法,实施商标执法的边境措施。商标是将一个企业的服务和商品与其他企业的服务和商品或商品区别开来的名称、标志、气味、标志或声音。商标要求是非描述性的、显著性的,如果商标注册人不迅速对其侵权行为采取行动,商标就会失去其显著性。商标注册人可以利用行政、民事、刑事、临时和边境措施保护其注册商标。注册商标所有人在可能出口和进口含有涉嫌相同侵权商标的涉嫌侵权商品时,要求采取边境措施。本文采用定性研究方法,对巴基斯坦、马来西亚和美国的商标执法边境措施进行了比较分析。边境措施的目的是通过行政海关自行或经注册商标所有人的申请和申诉,防止侵权商品的进出口。通过对巴基斯坦、马来西亚和美国商标执法边境措施的比较分析,发现注册商标所有人应在注册后立即向行政海关当局提供其注册商标的详细信息和规定的商品或服务的详细信息,海关当局才会及时对假冒商标商品的进出口采取行动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Economics Policy and Law
Health Economics Policy and Law HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: International trends highlight the confluence of economics, politics and legal considerations in the health policy process. Health Economics, Policy and Law serves as a forum for scholarship on health policy issues from these perspectives, and is of use to academics, policy makers and health care managers and professionals. HEPL is international in scope, publishes both theoretical and applied work, and contains articles on all aspects of health policy. Considerable emphasis is placed on rigorous conceptual development and analysis, and on the presentation of empirical evidence that is relevant to the policy process.
期刊最新文献
Success and failure in establishing national physician databases: a comparison between Canada and Israel. Implications of the fair processes for financing UHC report for development assistance: reflections and an application of the decision-making principles to PEPFAR. A systematic literature review of real-world evidence (RWE) on post-market assessment of medical devices. Response to critics of Open and Inclusive: Fair Processes for Financing Universal Health Coverage. Exploring the uptake of economic evaluation in Spanish reports positioning medicines for public reimbursement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1