EMBEDDEDNESS AND DISEMBEDDEDNESS IN ECONOMIC SOCIOLOGY IN THREE TIME PERIODS

Q3 Social Sciences Sociologia e Antropologia Pub Date : 2021-04-01 DOI:10.1590/2238-38752021v1112
Cristiano Monteiro, Raphael Lima
{"title":"EMBEDDEDNESS AND DISEMBEDDEDNESS IN ECONOMIC SOCIOLOGY IN THREE TIME PERIODS","authors":"Cristiano Monteiro, Raphael Lima","doi":"10.1590/2238-38752021v1112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The article sets out to demonstrate the continuing relevance of the concept of embeddedness in economic sociology, juxtaposing it with the question of disembeddedness through an analysis of three time periods. In the first period, the interpretation of the concept introduced by Karl Polanyi was marked by the notion of “social construction of the economy.” In the second period, the debate focused on criticizing the liberalizing agenda of the Washington Consensus, suggesting that its negative effects on economic development and social solidarity would force the state to retake control of the economy, re-embedding it. The third period acknowledges the specificity of the market economy through an analysis of neoliberalism as a political-institutional arrangement and a moral-normative system that produces “embeddedness on disembeddedness.” The article also discusses the re-establishment of social solidarity in an increasingly disembedded economy.","PeriodicalId":37552,"journal":{"name":"Sociologia e Antropologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociologia e Antropologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/2238-38752021v1112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract The article sets out to demonstrate the continuing relevance of the concept of embeddedness in economic sociology, juxtaposing it with the question of disembeddedness through an analysis of three time periods. In the first period, the interpretation of the concept introduced by Karl Polanyi was marked by the notion of “social construction of the economy.” In the second period, the debate focused on criticizing the liberalizing agenda of the Washington Consensus, suggesting that its negative effects on economic development and social solidarity would force the state to retake control of the economy, re-embedding it. The third period acknowledges the specificity of the market economy through an analysis of neoliberalism as a political-institutional arrangement and a moral-normative system that produces “embeddedness on disembeddedness.” The article also discusses the re-establishment of social solidarity in an increasingly disembedded economy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
三个时期经济社会学中的嵌入性与脱嵌入性
本文旨在通过对三个时期的分析,论证嵌入性概念在经济社会学中的持续相关性,并将其与脱嵌入性问题并置。在第一个时期,波兰尼引入的概念的解释以“经济的社会建设”的概念为标志。在第二个阶段,辩论的重点是批评华盛顿共识的自由化议程,认为它对经济发展和社会团结的负面影响将迫使国家重新控制经济,重新嵌入经济。第三个阶段通过分析新自由主义作为一种政治制度安排和道德规范体系而产生的“脱嵌入性上的嵌入性”,承认了市场经济的特殊性。文章还讨论了在日益脱离经济体系的情况下如何重建社会团结。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sociologia e Antropologia
Sociologia e Antropologia Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: Sociologia & Antropologia busca contribuir para a divulgação, expansão e aprimoramento do conhecimento sociológico e antropológico em seus diversos campos temáticos e perspectivas teóricas, valorizando a troca profícua entre as distintas tradições teóricas que configuram as duas disciplinas. Sociologia & Antropologia almeja, portanto, a colaboração, a um só tempo crítica e compreensiva, entre as perspectivas sociológica e antropológica, favorecendo a comunicação dinâmica e o debate sobre questões teóricas, empíricas, históricas e analíticas cruciais. Reconhecendo a natureza pluriparadigmática do conhecimento social, a Revista valoriza assim as oportunidades de intercâmbio entre pontos de vista convergentes e divergentes nesses diferentes campos do conhecimento. Essa é a proposta expressa pelo símbolo “&”, que, no título da revista Sociologia & Antropologia, interliga as denominações das disciplinas que nos referenciam. Sociologia & Antropologia aceita os seguintes tipos de contribuição: 1) Artigos inéditos (até 9 mil palavras incluindo referências bibliográficas e notas) 2) Registros de pesquisa (até 4.400 palavras). Esta seção inclui: Apresentação de fontes e documentos de interesse para a história das ciências sociais Notas de pesquisa com fotografias Balanço bibliográfico de temas e questões das ciências sociais 3) Resenhas bibliográficas (até 1.600 palavras). 4) Entrevistas
期刊最新文献
Lineamentos bibliográficos sobre a Tropicália O que há de sociológico no crime organizado? Uma revisão do conceito UMBANDA É CONHECIMENTO: PASSOS PARA UMA ABORDAGEM EPISTÊMICA DA RELIGIÃO Esboço de uma sociologia dos problemas íntimos Time and the production of space in sociology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1