{"title":"Efficacy of Amendments in TPH Removal during Bioremediation of Agricultural Crude Oil-polluted Soil","authors":"B. Baranu, C. Ogugbue, Gideon C. Okpokwasilli","doi":"10.9734/jabb/2021/v24i1130250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study identified the efficacy of different amendments as biostimulants in bioremediation. This experiment was carried out for 4 weeks in the laboratory. One kilogram of pristine soil was spiked with one liter of crude oil in earthen pots, to each pot 10 grams of amendments were added and mixed thoroughly. The amendments used were poultry dropping (C-PD), cow dung (D-CD), N.P.K (E), and a control (A and B) setup undergoing natural attenuation. The microcosms’ initial physicochemical characteristics such as total organic nitrogen, pH, temperature, total organic carbon, total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH), and polyaromatic hydrocarbon (PAH). The microbial enumeration was done for total heterotrophic bacteria (THB) and hydrocarbon utilizing bacteria (HUB). The molecular characterization of the pristine soil (A) and contaminated soil (B) was also done using the shotgun analysis. The THB of A and B was 1.3 x 107 and 2.1 x 102 while the HUB was 1.63 x 105 and 1.1 x 101on day 1 respectively. The THB of treatments during bioremediation at week 2 was 1.75 x 108, 1.89 x 108, 1.5 x 108 and 2.2 x 108 while at week 4, the THB was 1.90 x 108, 2.1 x 108, 2.20 x 108 and 2.25 x 108 while the HUB at week 2 was 1.20 x 105, 3.0 x 105, 2.5 x 105 and 1.98 x 105 while at week 4, the HUB was 2.0 x 106, 2.19 x 106, 2.46 x 106 and 2.1 x 106 for B, PD, CD ,and N.P.K respectively. The molecular characterization of A and B showed there was a higher microbial diversity in the contaminated soil than in the pristine soil. This study has shown that cow dung is more effective in the bioremediation of total petroleum hydrocarbon, and polyaromatic hydrocarbon in crude oil-contaminated soil.","PeriodicalId":15023,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advances in Biology & Biotechnology","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advances in Biology & Biotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/jabb/2021/v24i1130250","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study identified the efficacy of different amendments as biostimulants in bioremediation. This experiment was carried out for 4 weeks in the laboratory. One kilogram of pristine soil was spiked with one liter of crude oil in earthen pots, to each pot 10 grams of amendments were added and mixed thoroughly. The amendments used were poultry dropping (C-PD), cow dung (D-CD), N.P.K (E), and a control (A and B) setup undergoing natural attenuation. The microcosms’ initial physicochemical characteristics such as total organic nitrogen, pH, temperature, total organic carbon, total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH), and polyaromatic hydrocarbon (PAH). The microbial enumeration was done for total heterotrophic bacteria (THB) and hydrocarbon utilizing bacteria (HUB). The molecular characterization of the pristine soil (A) and contaminated soil (B) was also done using the shotgun analysis. The THB of A and B was 1.3 x 107 and 2.1 x 102 while the HUB was 1.63 x 105 and 1.1 x 101on day 1 respectively. The THB of treatments during bioremediation at week 2 was 1.75 x 108, 1.89 x 108, 1.5 x 108 and 2.2 x 108 while at week 4, the THB was 1.90 x 108, 2.1 x 108, 2.20 x 108 and 2.25 x 108 while the HUB at week 2 was 1.20 x 105, 3.0 x 105, 2.5 x 105 and 1.98 x 105 while at week 4, the HUB was 2.0 x 106, 2.19 x 106, 2.46 x 106 and 2.1 x 106 for B, PD, CD ,and N.P.K respectively. The molecular characterization of A and B showed there was a higher microbial diversity in the contaminated soil than in the pristine soil. This study has shown that cow dung is more effective in the bioremediation of total petroleum hydrocarbon, and polyaromatic hydrocarbon in crude oil-contaminated soil.
本研究确定了不同的修正剂作为生物刺激剂在生物修复中的功效。本实验在实验室进行了4周。在一公斤原始土壤中加入一升原油,放入陶罐中,每个陶罐中加入10克改良剂并彻底混合。使用的改进剂为禽粪(C-PD)、牛粪(D-CD)、N.P.K (E)和自然衰减的对照(a和B)设置。微观世界的初始物理化学特征,如总有机氮、pH、温度、总有机碳、总石油烃(TPH)和多芳烃(PAH)。对总异养菌(THB)和烃类利用菌(HUB)进行微生物计数。采用散弹枪分析对原始土壤(A)和污染土壤(B)进行了分子表征。第1天,A和B的THB分别为1.3 × 107和2.1 × 102, HUB分别为1.63 × 105和1.1 × 101。治疗的有生物修复在一周2是1.75×108,1.89 x 108, 1.5 x 108和2.2 x 108在周4,有1.90 x 108, 2.1 x 108, 2.20 x 108和2.25 x 108而中心在星期2是1.20×105,3.0 x 105, 2.5 x 105和1.98 x 105在周4,中心为2.0×106,2.19 x 106, 2.46 x 106和2.1 x 106 B, PD, CD, N.P.K分别。A和B的分子特征表明,污染土壤中的微生物多样性高于未污染土壤。研究表明,牛粪对原油污染土壤中总烃和多芳烃的生物修复效果较好。