The Obligation to Grant Nationality to Stateless Children under Customary International Law

W. T. Worster
{"title":"The Obligation to Grant Nationality to Stateless Children under Customary International Law","authors":"W. T. Worster","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3073653","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The problem of children being born stateless without being able to identify a state that must grant them nationality continues be a problem that begs for legal clarity. Children are some of society’s most vulnerable people, needing care, education, health developmental services and so on. Yet when they are born into situations of statelessness, it is often difficult if not impossible for them to access any of these services and meet their basic developmental needs. The international community has taken many steps to eradicate child statelessness but it still persists. This result stands despite the desperate needs for children and widespread acknowledgment that international law protects every person’s, especially child’s, right to a nationality.\r\n\r\nThis paper will reconsider the question of whether we can point to a state that bears the responsibility for granting nationality to a child born stateless. In examining this question, this paper considers whether customary international law might have evolved to offer an answer to the question of which state is responsible. First, the paper looks at the most contemporary understand of customary international law to develop a methodology. The method for determining the customary international law has been changing and the time is ripe to apply our new understanding to this problem. Second, it applies this methodology to emerging practice on child statelessness. Partly due to the increased focus on the question as a result of the current UNHCR campaign to end child stateless, state practice and opinio juris has been shifting rapidly. In this analysis, the author considers that evolving understanding of customary international law and the changes in practice have shifted so that we can now identify the state that has the obligation to grant nationality to stateless children. Specifically, customary international law requires the state where the child was born to grant nationality to it, if it would be otherwise stateless and no state has granted it nationality.","PeriodicalId":18488,"journal":{"name":"Michigan State international law review","volume":"8 1","pages":"441"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Michigan State international law review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3073653","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The problem of children being born stateless without being able to identify a state that must grant them nationality continues be a problem that begs for legal clarity. Children are some of society’s most vulnerable people, needing care, education, health developmental services and so on. Yet when they are born into situations of statelessness, it is often difficult if not impossible for them to access any of these services and meet their basic developmental needs. The international community has taken many steps to eradicate child statelessness but it still persists. This result stands despite the desperate needs for children and widespread acknowledgment that international law protects every person’s, especially child’s, right to a nationality. This paper will reconsider the question of whether we can point to a state that bears the responsibility for granting nationality to a child born stateless. In examining this question, this paper considers whether customary international law might have evolved to offer an answer to the question of which state is responsible. First, the paper looks at the most contemporary understand of customary international law to develop a methodology. The method for determining the customary international law has been changing and the time is ripe to apply our new understanding to this problem. Second, it applies this methodology to emerging practice on child statelessness. Partly due to the increased focus on the question as a result of the current UNHCR campaign to end child stateless, state practice and opinio juris has been shifting rapidly. In this analysis, the author considers that evolving understanding of customary international law and the changes in practice have shifted so that we can now identify the state that has the obligation to grant nationality to stateless children. Specifically, customary international law requires the state where the child was born to grant nationality to it, if it would be otherwise stateless and no state has granted it nationality.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
根据习惯国际法给予无国籍儿童国籍的义务
儿童出生时无国籍,无法确定哪个国家必须给予他们国籍的问题,仍然是一个需要明确法律规定的问题。儿童是社会上最脆弱的人群之一,需要照顾、教育、保健发展服务等等。然而,当他们出生在无国籍的情况下时,他们往往很难(如果不是不可能的话)获得任何这些服务并满足他们的基本发展需求。国际社会为消除儿童无国籍状态采取了许多步骤,但这种情况仍然存在。尽管对儿童的迫切需要和普遍承认国际法保护每个人,特别是儿童的国籍权,但这一结果仍然存在。本文将重新考虑一个问题,即我们是否可以指出一个国家有责任给予无国籍出生的孩子国籍。在研究这个问题时,本文考虑习惯国际法是否可能已经发展到为哪个国家负责的问题提供答案。首先,本文着眼于对习惯国际法最现代的理解,以发展一种方法论。确定习惯国际法的方法一直在发生变化,将我们的新认识应用于这一问题的时机已经成熟。其次,它将这种方法应用于关于无国籍儿童的新兴实践。部分原因是由于难民专员办事处目前开展的结束儿童无国籍现象的运动使人们更加关注这一问题,国家做法和法律意见正在迅速转变。在这一分析中,作者认为,对习惯国际法的不断发展的理解和实践中的变化已经发生了变化,因此我们现在可以确定有义务向无国籍儿童授予国籍的国家。具体地说,习惯国际法要求,如果该儿童是无国籍的,并且没有国家给予其国籍,则该儿童的出生国应给予其国籍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Incomparable Chief Justiceship of William Howard Taft Looking for a Life Raft: Citizen Voice and Votes of No Confidence Retracing the Right to Free Movement: Mapping a Path Forward Patent Reform, Then and Now The Obligation to Grant Nationality to Stateless Children under Customary International Law
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1