A study to compare pulmonary function in apparently healthy females exposed to biomass fuel combustion versus clean fuel combustion in Allahabad District

T. Mahmood, Ashish Jain, A. Verma, Pundarik Dwivedi
{"title":"A study to compare pulmonary function in apparently healthy females exposed to biomass fuel combustion versus clean fuel combustion in Allahabad District","authors":"T. Mahmood, Ashish Jain, A. Verma, Pundarik Dwivedi","doi":"10.4103/ijaai.ijaai_4_19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: Life in a typical Indian household revolves around the cooking area, and Indian women spend much of their time there. Cooking stoves in biomass fuel users are nothing more than a pit, a chulha, or three pieces of brick. Cooking under these conditions entails high levels of exposure to cooking smoke. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: (1) To compare the pulmonary function parameters of biomass fuel users with clean fuel users. (2) To evaluate the pulmonary function test (PFT) among individuals exposed to biomass fuel combustion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three hundred and fourteen nonsmoking women without any history of any major chronic illness in the past were selected for this study. The study group comprised of 68 women exposed to biomass fuel combustion, 105 women exposed to clean fuel combustion, and 141 women exposed to mixed fuel (earlier using biomass fuel but now gradually shifting to clean fuel). All women were evaluated for PFTs MIR spirolab III. OBSERVATION AND RESULTS: The lung function parameters were significantly lower in the women exposed to biomass fuel in comparison to the clean fuel users and mixed fuel users forced expiratory volume 1 (FEV1) (P < 0.05); FEV1/forced vital capacity (FVC) (P < 0.05); FVC (P < 0.05); peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) (P < 0.05); the lung function parameters were also significantly reduced in group of mixed fuel users in comparison to the group of clean fuel users FEV1 (P < 0.05); FEV1/FVC (P < 0.05); FVC (P < 0.05); PEFR (P < 0.05). The evaluation of PFTs suggested the increased risk to the obstructive type of pulmonary disease in biomass users. CONCLUSION: The reduction in the pulmonary function in the biomass-exposed women could be due to high exposure to biomass pollutants with inadequate ventilation in cooking area.","PeriodicalId":53075,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Allergy Asthma and Immunology","volume":"948 1","pages":"79 - 85"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Allergy Asthma and Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijaai.ijaai_4_19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Life in a typical Indian household revolves around the cooking area, and Indian women spend much of their time there. Cooking stoves in biomass fuel users are nothing more than a pit, a chulha, or three pieces of brick. Cooking under these conditions entails high levels of exposure to cooking smoke. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: (1) To compare the pulmonary function parameters of biomass fuel users with clean fuel users. (2) To evaluate the pulmonary function test (PFT) among individuals exposed to biomass fuel combustion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three hundred and fourteen nonsmoking women without any history of any major chronic illness in the past were selected for this study. The study group comprised of 68 women exposed to biomass fuel combustion, 105 women exposed to clean fuel combustion, and 141 women exposed to mixed fuel (earlier using biomass fuel but now gradually shifting to clean fuel). All women were evaluated for PFTs MIR spirolab III. OBSERVATION AND RESULTS: The lung function parameters were significantly lower in the women exposed to biomass fuel in comparison to the clean fuel users and mixed fuel users forced expiratory volume 1 (FEV1) (P < 0.05); FEV1/forced vital capacity (FVC) (P < 0.05); FVC (P < 0.05); peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) (P < 0.05); the lung function parameters were also significantly reduced in group of mixed fuel users in comparison to the group of clean fuel users FEV1 (P < 0.05); FEV1/FVC (P < 0.05); FVC (P < 0.05); PEFR (P < 0.05). The evaluation of PFTs suggested the increased risk to the obstructive type of pulmonary disease in biomass users. CONCLUSION: The reduction in the pulmonary function in the biomass-exposed women could be due to high exposure to biomass pollutants with inadequate ventilation in cooking area.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较阿拉哈巴德地区暴露于生物质燃料燃烧与清洁燃料燃烧的表面健康女性肺功能的研究
背景:典型印度家庭的生活围绕着烹饪区展开,印度妇女的大部分时间都花在烹饪上。生物质燃料使用者的炉灶只不过是一个坑,一个chulha或三块砖。在这些条件下烹饪需要高度暴露于烹饪烟雾中。目的和目的:(1)比较生物质燃料使用者和清洁燃料使用者的肺功能参数。(2)评价生物质燃料燃烧暴露个体的肺功能测试(PFT)。材料和方法:本研究选择了314名过去没有任何重大慢性疾病史的不吸烟女性。研究小组由68名接触生物质燃料燃烧的妇女、105名接触清洁燃料燃烧的妇女和141名接触混合燃料(早期使用生物质燃料,但现在逐渐转向使用清洁燃料)的妇女组成。对所有女性进行PFTs - MIR - spirallab III评估。观察与结果:与清洁燃料使用者和混合燃料使用者相比,暴露于生物质燃料的女性肺功能参数显著降低(P < 0.05);FEV1/用力肺活量(FVC) (P < 0.05);FVC (p < 0.05);呼气流量峰值(PEFR) (P < 0.05);混合燃料组肺功能参数FEV1较清洁燃料组显著降低(P < 0.05);Fev1 / fvc (p < 0.05);FVC (p < 0.05);(p < 0.05)。对PFTs的评估表明,生物质使用者患阻塞性肺病的风险增加。结论:生物质暴露妇女肺功能下降可能与炊事区高暴露于生物质污染物且通风不良有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊最新文献
Serum level of interleukin-6, interleukin-17A, and interferon-α in hospitalized COVID-19 patients and their clinical correlation: A hospital-based case–control study from North-East India Fungal sensitization and its impact on asthma control – A prospective study at allergy clinic Concurrent administration of COVID-19 vaccine and seasonal influenza vaccine: Expected rate of adverse effect Quality of life assessment in children and their caregivers suffering from allergic rhinitis and/or asthma Asthma management with the help of digital therapeutics: Review of clinical trials
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1