Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli in British Columbia, 2011-2017: Analysis to inform exclusion guidelines.

K. Noftall, K. Noftall, M. Taylor, L. Hoang, L. Hoang, E. Galanis, E. Galanis
{"title":"Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli in British Columbia, 2011-2017: Analysis to inform exclusion guidelines.","authors":"K. Noftall, K. Noftall, M. Taylor, L. Hoang, L. Hoang, E. Galanis, E. Galanis","doi":"10.14745/ccdr.v45i09a03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background\nShiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) can cause severe illness including bloody diarrhea and hemolytic-uremic syndrome (HUS) through the production of Shiga toxins 1 (Stx1) and 2 (Stx2). E. coli O157:H7 was the most common serotype detected in the 1980s to 1990s, but improvements in laboratory methods have led to increased detection of non-O157 STEC. Non-O157 STEC producing only Stx1 tend to cause milder clinical illness. Exclusion guidelines restrict return to high-risk work or settings for STEC cases, but most do not differentiate between STEC serogroups and Stx type.\n\n\nObjective\nTo analyze British Columbia (BC) laboratory and surveillance data to inform the BC STEC exclusion guideline.\n\n\nMethods\nFor all STEC cases reported in BC in 2011-2017, laboratory and epidemiological data were obtained through provincial laboratory and reportable disease electronic systems, respectively. Incidence was measured for all STEC combined as well as by serogroup. Associations were measured between serogroups, Stx types and clinical outcomes.\n\n\nResults\nOver the seven year period, 984 cases of STEC were reported. A decrease in O157 incidence was observed, while non-O157 rates increased. The O157 serogroup was significantly associated with Stx2. Significant associations were observed between Stx2 and bloody diarrhea, hospitalization and HUS.\n\n\nConclusion\nThe epidemiology of STEC has changed in BC as laboratories increasingly distinguish between O157 and non-O157 cases and identify Stx type. It appears that non-O157 cases with Stx1 are less severe than O157 cases with Stx2. The BC STEC exclusion guidelines were updated as a result of this analysis.","PeriodicalId":94304,"journal":{"name":"Canada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14745/ccdr.v45i09a03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Background Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) can cause severe illness including bloody diarrhea and hemolytic-uremic syndrome (HUS) through the production of Shiga toxins 1 (Stx1) and 2 (Stx2). E. coli O157:H7 was the most common serotype detected in the 1980s to 1990s, but improvements in laboratory methods have led to increased detection of non-O157 STEC. Non-O157 STEC producing only Stx1 tend to cause milder clinical illness. Exclusion guidelines restrict return to high-risk work or settings for STEC cases, but most do not differentiate between STEC serogroups and Stx type. Objective To analyze British Columbia (BC) laboratory and surveillance data to inform the BC STEC exclusion guideline. Methods For all STEC cases reported in BC in 2011-2017, laboratory and epidemiological data were obtained through provincial laboratory and reportable disease electronic systems, respectively. Incidence was measured for all STEC combined as well as by serogroup. Associations were measured between serogroups, Stx types and clinical outcomes. Results Over the seven year period, 984 cases of STEC were reported. A decrease in O157 incidence was observed, while non-O157 rates increased. The O157 serogroup was significantly associated with Stx2. Significant associations were observed between Stx2 and bloody diarrhea, hospitalization and HUS. Conclusion The epidemiology of STEC has changed in BC as laboratories increasingly distinguish between O157 and non-O157 cases and identify Stx type. It appears that non-O157 cases with Stx1 are less severe than O157 cases with Stx2. The BC STEC exclusion guidelines were updated as a result of this analysis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2011-2017年不列颠哥伦比亚省产志贺毒素大肠杆菌:为排除指南提供信息的分析
产志贺毒素的大肠杆菌(STEC)可通过产生志贺毒素1 (Stx1)和2 (Stx2)导致严重疾病,包括血性腹泻和溶血性尿毒症综合征(HUS)。大肠杆菌O157:H7是20世纪80年代至90年代检测到的最常见血清型,但实验室方法的改进导致非O157产志贺毒素大肠杆菌的检测增加。非o157产STEC只产生Stx1倾向于引起较轻的临床疾病。排除指南限制产志贺毒素大肠杆菌病例返回高风险工作或环境,但大多数不区分产志贺毒素大肠杆菌血清组和Stx型。目的分析不列颠哥伦比亚省(BC)实验室和监测数据,为BC省产志贺毒素大肠杆菌排除指南提供依据。方法对2011-2017年BC省报告的所有产志贺毒素大肠杆菌病例,分别通过省级实验室和报告性疾病电子系统获取实验室和流行病学数据。测量所有产志贺毒素大肠杆菌合并的发病率以及血清组。测定血清组、Stx型和临床结果之间的相关性。结果7年间共报告产志贺毒素大肠杆菌984例。O157的发病率下降,而非O157的发病率上升。O157血清组与Stx2显著相关。Stx2与出血性腹泻、住院和溶血性尿毒综合征有显著相关性。结论随着实验室越来越多地区分O157和非O157病例并确定Stx型,BC省STEC的流行病学发生了变化。非O157型Stx1病例的严重程度似乎低于O157型Stx2病例。该分析结果更新了BC产志在大肠杆菌排除指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Characteristics associated with SARS-CoV-2 testing, infection and vaccine uptake among essential non-healthcare workers in Montréal, 2021. Device and surgical procedure-related infections in Canadian acute care hospitals, 2018-2022. Efficacy, effectiveness and immunogenicity of reduced HPV vaccination schedules: A review of available evidence. Thematic description of factors linked with extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in humans. Healthcare-associated infections and antimicrobial resistance in Canadian acute care hospitals, 2018-2022.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1